The SEC is about to go down in flames

Search

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
8 teams would be much better. If Miss St and Florida ST both lose a regular season game then it will be a nightmare.
I agree, 8 teams would be ideal. We would not only get the 4 top teams, but maybe a couple two loss teams that catch fire at the end of the season. The excitement factor would take a big jump with an 8 team playoff. It would be closer to what we have with March Madness..
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
I agree, 8 teams would be ideal. We would not only get the 4 top teams, but maybe a couple two loss teams that catch fire at the end of the season. The excitement factor would take a big jump with an 8 team playoff. It would be closer to what we have with March Madness..

Exactly.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
320
Tokens
Yep.....8 teams is inevitable. It just makes too much sense for it not to happen.

You take the 5 conference winners. That leaves you 3 at large, and it the committee decides to let in a Marshall/Boise/ECU type team, then so be it.

You play the first round of four games on the higher seeds homefield, so as to cut down on travel expenses for fans. From there, you do it just like it's set up now. I wouldn't even have a problem going back to an 11 game schedule, if the school President's think that's too many football guys as it is. I mean, it could conceivably be 16 games for two teams. 12 regular season, a conf championship, and 3 playoff games if you get to the finals. That's ALOT of football for collegiate kids. Right now it would look something like this if it ended today:


Ohio State @ MS State vs TCU @ Alabama

AZ State @ FSU vs Baylor @ Oregon

Play all four games on a Saturday, starting at 12ET. You could have some slight overrun, but start them every two and a half hours for TV purposes. 12, 230, 5, 730.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
8,810
Tokens
Any 2-loss SEC West team is better than any team in the top 10 (non-SEC) after this latest poll came out.... True story.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Any 2-loss SEC West team is better than any team in the top 10 (non-SEC) after this latest poll came out.... True story.
That's probably true, but we're not talking about who is best, but who could or will be left out..
 

sdf

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
14,301
Tokens
I don't think Ohio St has a chance. Their schedule is sooooooo bad! A 1 loss TCU or Baylor would get in before them.

no way OSU gets in over TCU and would be surprising to see them get past Baylor...though Baylor non-conference schedule is laughable
 

New member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
3,556
Tokens
The ultimate SEC fan boy swoops in like a vampire to suckle on the the nearly breathless victims of Alabama, Auburn and LSU. Don't worry, Lestat. Since you're among the undead, you'll eventually see your program rise again to the top.....well, once they get solvent.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,565
Tokens
I agree, 8 teams would be ideal. We would not only get the 4 top teams, but maybe a couple two loss teams that catch fire at the end of the season. The excitement factor would take a big jump with an 8 team playoff. It would be closer to what we have with March Madness..

personally like the 6-team with #1 and #2 with a bye week....i haven't seen many years were #1 and #8 were so close that they deserved to be playing a KO game.

or even a 5-team with #1 getting bye....there's always been an aura around being "top 5" and that would make it really mean something.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
878
Tokens
Funny thread. Same nonsense from same guys as usual. SEC envy is so strong here.

Oregon is so envy of the SEC they scheduled another home & home series with a SEC team, Texas A&M came to their senses and cancelled it. :missingte

Your Vols had the balls that other SEC teams don't when it comes to playing a game west of the Mississippi so gotta give them credit for that.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
320
Tokens
Oregon is so envy of the SEC they scheduled another home & home series with a SEC team, Texas A&M came to their senses and cancelled it. :missingte

Your Vols had the balls that other SEC teams don't when it comes to playing a game west of the Mississippi so gotta give them credit for that.

Tell me this......why should an SEC team play someone on the West Coast? There is nothing to gain from it. If the SEC team wins, they were supposed to. There is zero budgetary reason to do it. There is zero recruiting benefits of such a game. There is just literally no reason for an SEC team to go out there and play.

Would I like to see Bama/Oregon? Auburn/Stanford? Ole Miss/Arizona? Sure. But again, there is just no reason to play the game. It makes much more sense to play a Big 12, ACC, or even Big 10 team. The SEC recruits those areas, so it just makes more sense as a program..

Im not bashing the PAC. I think it's easily the 2nd best conference in the conference. There are good teams at the top, the middle can beat you on a given day, and the bottom isn't Big 10/ACC level shitty. I enjoy watching the football out there. I just don't think it makes sense to play them unless it's a neutral site game in Dallas or Houston.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
personally like the 6-team with #1 and #2 with a bye week....i haven't seen many years were #1 and #8 were so close that they deserved to be playing a KO game.

or even a 5-team with #1 getting bye....there's always been an aura around being "top 5" and that would make it really mean something.
Anything would be better than 4 teams. This is one of those years where we happen to have 4 excellent teams in one division alone who are capable of beating anybody in the country on a given day. Then when you go out west, if USC ever gets good again, we could very well see at least 2 powerhouse teams from the Pac-12 every year. This is why we need at least 6 teams. But I still think 8 teams would erase all doubt of who should be in and who shouldn't. If they had it this year, both Baylor and TCU would be a handful for any team in the country. In an 8 team playoff we would probably get both of those teams in. Like I said, the excitement factor goes way up when you get these kinds of teams in the mix who aren't normally there.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
29,126
Tokens
Tell me this......why should an SEC team play someone on the West Coast? There is nothing to gain from it. If the SEC team wins, they were supposed to. There is zero budgetary reason to do it. There is zero recruiting benefits of such a game. There is just literally no reason for an SEC team to go out there and play.

Would I like to see Bama/Oregon? Auburn/Stanford? Ole Miss/Arizona? Sure. But again, there is just no reason to play the game. It makes much more sense to play a Big 12, ACC, or even Big 10 team. The SEC recruits those areas, so it just makes more sense as a program..

Im not bashing the PAC. I think it's easily the 2nd best conference in the conference. There are good teams at the top, the middle can beat you on a given day, and the bottom isn't Big 10/ACC level shitty. I enjoy watching the football out there. I just don't think it makes sense to play them unless it's a neutral site game in Dallas or Houston.

You're recruiting and budget argument makes sense.. My problem is why did A & M and Georgia schedule these home and home games to begin with in the first place ?..Oregon wants these kinds of games , so when the cancellation comes we are left with an open date that might be tough to fill with a desirable opponent
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
7,158
Tokens
Red Eye, how big are the losses of TE Brown, a CB, and their Center? Looks like the Ducks are banged up coming out of Utah
 

New member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
878
Tokens
Red Eye, how big are the losses of TE Brown, a CB, and their Center? Looks like the Ducks are banged up coming out of Utah

Huge, Ekpre-Olomu said he will play against Colorado, will be tough to replace Brown and nobody can replace Grasu who is easilly the player that will be missed the most.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
14,873
Tokens
personally like the 6-team with #1 and #2 with a bye week....i haven't seen many years were #1 and #8 were so close that they deserved to be playing a KO game.

or even a 5-team with #1 getting bye....there's always been an aura around being "top 5" and that would make it really mean something.

I'm not to keen on the idea of 2 teams getting a bye , i think it "could" be a disadvantage to them instead of an advantage.

It works fine in the nfl where the playoffs start right after the reg season ends , but in cfb with the month layoff i think the teams not getting a bye would be able to shake off the rust and find a rythem.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
320
Tokens
You're recruiting and budget argument makes sense.. My problem is why did A & M and Georgia schedule these home and home games to begin with in the first place ?..Oregon wants these kinds of games , so when the cancellation comes we are left with an open date that might be tough to fill with a desirable opponent

I agree with you, and honestly, don't have an answer. They should have never agreed to them to begin with. If TAMU wants to play a tough OOC game, they could play a TX school or OK team. It makes much more sense. On Georgia, I don't get it. Recently UGA had OOC games with GT and Clemson in the same year.....to go along with their SEC schedule. That's just stupid, IMO. There is no reason to play those type of OOC games when you play so many big games in conference. If I were Oregon, I would play Idaho, Fresno, Wyoming, and maybe Utah State. Why play a tough OOC game? Oregon has nothing to gain, because they are a media darling(I don't mean that as an insult.....I mean it in the same way ND, Ohio State, Alabama, etc are).

I can see why Oregon would be frustrated with the scheduling. Ole Miss had that come up a few years ago with a big school, and we had to replace them with VMI or something like that. IT certainly leaves the school holding the contract at a big disadvantage from a scheduling conflict.

For the record, and I know it's somewhat off topic, Ole Miss and FSU just agreed to open the 2016 season against each other in Orlando. Should be fun.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
878
Tokens
If I were Oregon, I would play Idaho, Fresno, Wyoming, and maybe Utah State.

Pac 12 teams don't have the luxury of playing 4 non conference games, they almost always play 3 non conference games to start the year.

Why play a tough OOC game? Oregon has nothing to gain

With the new playoff system loading your schedule with directional schools can actually work against you.

Selection committee members will have a wealth of information including review of video, statistics and their own expertise to guide them in their deliberations. They will emphasize obvious factors like win-loss records, strength of schedule, conference championships won, head-to-head results and results against common opponents

You are already seeing teams start to schedule tougher non conference schudules, wait till you see a team not make the playoffs because they chose one team over another because of the other teams cream puff non conference schedule.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
29,126
Tokens
Red Eye, how big are the losses of TE Brown, a CB, and their Center? Looks like the Ducks are banged up coming out of Utah

not sure how bad all of this is yet.. But first thing that crossed my mind was we have a bye, followed by Colorado & Oregon St.. Gives us time to get the line healthy plus the latest injuries dealt with.. been a rough year
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,985
Messages
13,589,827
Members
101,038
Latest member
azerbaijanevisa
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com