Texas deserves to be in the National Championship

[Two-Niner]

You are a laugh... Remind us how that Cal vs. Texas bowl controversy turned out again... I think the Big 12 teams showed the punk 10 teams why they were, where they were. Kind of like Mack vs. Pete in the national championship... now that I think about it.

 

[EveryGamblersDream]

You are a laugh... Remind us how that Cal vs. Texas bowl controversy turned out again... I think the Big 12 teams showed the punk 10 teams why they were, where they were. Kind of like Mack vs. Pete in the national championship... now that I think about it.

Oh yeah the national title game where you needed the refs & a miracle to win.

 

[Addict101]

You are a laugh... Remind us how that Cal vs. Texas bowl controversy turned out again... I think the Big 12 teams showed the punk 10 teams why they were, where they were. Kind of like Mack vs. Pete in the national championship... now that I think about it.

What happened the last time Pete and Bob met up for an NC?

 

[guitarjosh]

You are a laugh... Remind us how that Cal vs. Texas bowl controversy turned out again... I think the Big 12 teams showed the punk 10 teams why they were, where they were. Kind of like Mack vs. Pete in the national championship... now that I think about it.

Yeah, "Give it to Vince". What a great coach.
hno:

 

[Conan]

Any conference that gives it up and lets the BCS decide who will play in their championship game deserves all the crap the whiners are complaining about. Can't they decide these things in a fair way with the rules the same going in for everyone? All the rest of the conferences do it and there's little if any complaints. You deserve all the shit you have heaped on yourselves for setting it up the way you did.

YOU KNOW THIS IS A FACT!

You cooked it, now eat it.

 

[earl]

no playoff no peace!

 

[PublicsMoney]

You are a complete idiot if you believe this nonsense. Texas homers always choose to overlook how the refs gave them points they didn't truly deserve. How many possessions were continued due to an obvious bad call when they originally stalled?

Oh that's right, lets sweep that under the rug as it doesn't help our point. Texas lost to Texas Tech in a game that was not as close as the score indicated. Texas barely got by Oklahoma State. However you have Oklahoma who laid it on both teams.

Sorry Texas but the same system which helped you in the past will screw you this time around. The team that loses earliest always has the advantage later in the season. History has proven that & continues to show why the system is fucked up to begin with.

I hate Texas & don't feel they deserve the shot along with knowing they are not better than Oklahoma. However I couldn't say it would be fair if they got left out. I'd say the same thing for Texas Tech as a stupid BCS system should not be the deciding factor in a conference race.

You speak volumes buddy. Now go shoot yourself.

 

[DeathEatsaCracker]

Any conference that gives it up and lets the BCS decide who will play in their championship game deserves all the crap the whiners are complaining about. Can't they decide these things in a fair way with the rules the same going in for everyone? All the rest of the conferences do it and there's little if any complaints. You deserve all the shit you have heaped on yourselves for setting it up the way you did.

YOU KNOW THIS IS A FACT!

You cooked it, now eat it.

Using the BCS is the 5th tiebreaker. All the other conferences use it as well.

 

[DeathEatsaCracker]

When did Texas beat TT :nohead:

Duh :think2:

Would you mind explaining how TT is going to play in the Big XII Championship game?

 

[DeathEatsaCracker]

I guess the Tejas fans are hating the fact that OU is #1 in the newest Sagarin Computer Poll.

 

[Conan]

Using the BCS is the 5th tiebreaker. All the other conferences use it as well.

In the event of a 3-way tie among 3 teams who beat each other it is the ONLY tiebreaker, not the 5th.
And as far as ALL other conferences use it, that's a complete crock. Prove who uses it. Let's see your sources, if you even have one.

 

[DeathEatsaCracker]

Brent Mussberger was my source, but I've found that that is not correct. I retract my statement.

However, I will say that the SEC's tiebreaker in the exact same situation is much worse.

 

[BBBILLY]

Good morning. I love this place. OU's in and thats it!!!


:nohead:BBB

 

[DeathEatsaCracker]

Soumi

 

[Cusipz]

If the goal of the BCS is to put the two best teams in the title game - then USC should be ranked #1.

On a neutral field, USC would be favored over any other team. That is the true definition of 'best' because you can put your money where your mouth is.

USC/FL are the two 'best' teams - the system is a joke.

 

[BBBILLY]

Soumi

They just don't get it do they Bro? OU can't be faulted for the system.


BBBd1g1t

 

[MSUSpartans]

In the event of a 3-way tie among 3 teams who beat each other it is the ONLY tiebreaker, not the 5th.
And as far as ALL other conferences use it, that's a complete crock. Prove who uses it. Let's see your sources, if you even have one.

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=1546006&DB_OEM_ID=10410

Divisional Tiebreakers: The following procedure will determine the representative from each division in the event of a tie:

1. If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative
2. If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 7 will be followed until a determination is made. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.
   1. The records of the three teams will be compared against each other
   2. The records of the three teams will be compared within their division
   3. The records of the three teams will be compared against the next highest placed teams in their division in order of fi nish (4, 5 and 6)
   4. The records of the three teams will be compared against all common conference opponents;
   5. The highest ranked team in the first Bowl Championship Series Poll following the completion of Big 12 regular season conference play shall be the representative
   6. The team with the best overall winning percentage [excluding exempted games] shall be the representative
   7. The representative will be chosen by draw.

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=1546006&DB_OEM_ID=10410

 

[Uno]

When did Texas beat TT :nohead:

Duh :think2:

you're a fucking idiot. he was not talking about TT... anyone who does talk about TT is a fucking idiot.

TT is not part of the discussion.

OU and UT are the two teams that are being discussed and one has already beaten the other by double digits.

Anyone who does not recognize that is a fucking idiot.

Also OSU and USC are not the same at all. If OSU had been a one loss team then it would factor in.

The only way anyone can justify any of this stuidity is to bring shit into the equation that is inconsequential. Texas Tech, USC, OSU, none of that shit matters.

45-35 on a fucking neutral field. if that doesn't do it for ya than you're a fucking idiot.

don't worry you are not alone.

 

[EveryGamblersDream]

you're a fucking idiot. he was not talking about TT... anyone who does talk about TT is a fucking idiot.

TT is not part of the discussion.

OU and UT are the two teams that are being discussed and one has already beaten the other by double digits.

Anyone who does not recognize that is a fucking idiot.

Also OSU and USC are not the same at all. If OSU had been a one loss team then it would factor in.

The only way anyone can justify any of this stuidity is to bring shit into the equation that is inconsequential. Texas Tech, USC, OSU, none of that shit matters.

45-35 on a fucking neutral field. if that doesn't do it for ya than you're a fucking idiot.

don't worry you are not alone.

You are the one who is the idiot. You want to bring up H2H but ignore that Texas has NO ADVANTAGE over the other two. They were all even & this is a fact whether you like it or not.

 

[KILLER]

I would just like to say you're a tard.

you're a fucking idiot. he was not talking about TT... anyone who does talk about TT is a fucking idiot.

TT is not part of the discussion.

OU and UT are the two teams that are being discussed and one has already beaten the other by double digits.

Anyone who does not recognize that is a fucking idiot.

Also OSU and USC are not the same at all. If OSU had been a one loss team then it would factor in.

The only way anyone can justify any of this stuidity is to bring shit into the equation that is inconsequential. Texas Tech, USC, OSU, none of that shit matters.

45-35 on a fucking neutral field. if that doesn't do it for ya than you're a fucking idiot.

don't worry you are not alone.