:nohead:
Quick:
ARE THE ELDERY ALIVE IN SOMEONE ELSES BODY?
DO THE ELDERLY DEPEND ON A HOST HUMAN FOR ITS SURVIVAL?
IF YOU ARE ELDERY, WOULD NOT YOU PARENTS ALREADY BE DEAD?
The analogy you are using is weak as fuck. Its apples and oranges to say the least. A elderly person is an adult and therefore makes his or her own decisions and just cant be "terminated."
An infant on the other hand cannot develop without the care or a mother and the biological support of the mother. Thus the survival totally depends on the mother taking this responsibility. So, its the mothers choice in what action takes place. End of story.
The fact that anyone would say this makes me nauseous. Sure I'm bothered by our tax dollars being allocated to funds helping parents who were never in an appropriate position to have a child in the first place, but you have no morals. Most simply put, no human should ever have any control over another human's RIGHT to reproduce. You can hate them for doing it, but who the f**k do you think you are to control... life?
sure, why not? they'll be gaining 5-10M guaranteed votes when they grant amnesty to illegals by 2011
btw, anti-abortion myself (is there a bigger lefty euphemism than pro-choice which should, of course, be pro-abortion) but also feel the govt has no right to make laws regarding the issue. states do, feds do not
If that is how you look at it then that is just putting principal over monetary gains. Because after all the whole idea of putting together a base is to keep your seat and keep you getting paid (last time i checked these people were not working for free). So most politicians will sell out their principals in order to save their seat. Again, and i have said this over and over again...this is a microcosm of the world we live in today. Wealth or financial stability trumps all. The ends always justify the means in the eyes of society at large. So if this is Pelosi's angle then i applaud her for it. Im not a Democrat but i am a social liberal and to me someone willing to put the needs of the country over the needs of themselves is what defines a statesmen.
First of all the Neocon (yes i know your not one) leadership fumbled the ball on illegals on purpose and we both know why...lobby man said to. So lets not pretend that this is a partisan issue.
Secondly, i like you have always been favor of Rowe v Wade being abolished. And then giving the true choice to the states. Its about time these states started to sink or swim on their own and in order to let them do so, they need to be able to be competitive.
you just said pelosi and statesman in the same paragraphuke1:
If what she is doing putting the country before her wheel house then that is exactly what she is (in that regard anyway). Believe me, the spending whore doesnt get the nod on much else. with that said, Tizzy... unlike most here, i tend to think for myself, therefore i am. I am an independent free thinker who base my decisions not on party lines, not on ideology, not on spiritual matters nor on environmental agendas... but logic and logic only. Party's (as you know) are only for the weak and for those who need labels to do thinking for them.
