Donald Sterling has filed suits (multiple) seeking to stop the sale of the team. Neither of which has anything to do with the family trust.
Also notice, you can not even acknowledge your own dumb ass comments regarding what the lawyers would say to Sterling and that Sterling is "giving up"
You are one of the stupidest and most pathetic people on the Internet.
Dumbass, the lawsuit regarding the family trust has a whole lot to do with the NBA because it involves the ownership of an NBA team and is holding up the potential sale of a team, and the NBA Commissioner even commented on it. So you might want to stop making the idiotic assertion that has "nothing to do with the NBA" Such statements remind everyone how stupid you are.
As to your laughably pathetic attempt to say that if Sterling loses in probate court "just about everything you said was correct" we can refer to your own words:
You realize dumbass that if Shelly Sterling wins in probate court there will be no vote by the owners, right?
Of course your moronic prediction of events was:
Sterling banned for life ---> NBA votes him out (29-0) as owner ---> NBA sells team
The reality of events is:
No NBA Owners Vote to oust Don Sterling ---> Shelly Sterling uses legal conditions of family trust to seize control of trust & team ---> (potentially) Shelly Sterling sells team
For you to claim anything, any one single thing, you claimed about this matter is correct is laughable and preposterous.
All of your clueless comments here reveal a low IQ and laughable ignorance of the topic.
No, you laughable loser, you didn't understand it at all. Here is your comically stupid assertion:
Originally Posted by akphidelt
Willfull simply means he willfully had a conversation making racist comments.That is not the wrong "context" it is 100% factually false. Not only did you not understand that the NBA Constitution is a legal document authored by a bunch of lawyers, thus the term "willful" has an actual legal definition, you used it incorrectly. Not out of any context, you used it laughably wrong.
Willfully:
intending the result which actually conies to pass ; [referring to acts which are intentional, conscious and directed toward achieving a purpose.]
In other words, you absolute moron, in order for the act to be 'willful' Sterling would have to have the conversation knowing the results of the conversation would result in bad publicity for the NBA.
To say that you used the word in the wrong "context" is laughable and pathetic.
You are laughable and pathetic.
Um, this lawsuit was filed in federal court:
The suit, filed in federal court in California, accuses the league and Commissioner Adam Silver of punishing Mr. Sterling based on an "illegally" obtained recording as it asks for at least $1 billion in damages. It also asks to have Mr. Sterling remain in place as owner and for the league to drop a $2.5 million fine levied against him over racist comments that were made public in the recording.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/clippers-owner-donald-sterling-sues-nba-in-federal-court-1401499462
It has nothing to do with his wife, the family trust, or the probate court trial.
Why do you keep posting these dumb fuck lies?
Willie and Acebb are weird ass dudes. Acebb can't even admit he was wrong about Vitterd posting in the Poly forum. He couldn't admit he was wrong about liquidating assets, etc. There are many more, the dude is one of the biggest liars on this site.
The entire reason why Willie is acting like a pussy is he refuses to admit he made racist comments. It's hilarious. He even had the audacity to try to come up with some math he was using to make those comments. It was ridiculous.
And then dumbass festeringZit says I am 100% wrong and Willie just misspoke... lol. What a clown these guys are. Never seen such an embarrassing group of kids in my life.
But Willie takes the "Pussy of the Year" award for his FF debacle. Going to be hard to overcome that.
Remember:
You're a laughable dumbass who can't stop lying.
Notice, you can no longer even engage this topic because you've made a total and complete ass of yourself.
Originally Posted by akphidelt
All these lawsuits are based on his wife and their family trust.
No they don't, you laughably stupid liar.
If it goes to auction sterlings get less then 2B. Ballmer number would not be the starting price and no one else will get within 500m of that number. The only reason Silver even HAS A CHANCE for this to end quickly and without immense damage to the NBA is Shelly wanting out and Don not being as sharp as he used to be due to his advanced age. I only read the last two pages of this thread but with all due respect AKPH is way off in his posts.
[FONT=Georgia, serif]I tell you, if there's one thing that's consistent in this forum, it's that scum and gtc08-IQ and duuuuhfinch and the guesser all agree with the least prepared man in the room, literally switching with him whenever he flip flops and should the race baiting fraud ever stop quickly, they all have shit on their noses. But the thing I like best about them is that they always disagree with me, which makes me appreciate even more so than usual what a lucky man I am. For that, I thank them. [/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, serif]and when wabash jumps in to tell me what a bad person I am while defending the 4 Muskebamas, my amusement rises to another level
to put it simply, I love being despised by the people who despise me in the political arena, I could not be happier. I can't even think of one redeeming factor any of them bring to this gambling site, save for maybe scum's fades (that's actually something substantive)
do they interact well with others?
do they bring something constructive?
do they post winners?
are they known for anything good?
now many posters might fit into 1, 2 or even 3 of those categories, but only a very few (maybe just two, the two I respect the least) sweep the board. The others may actually get along well with others away from the RR and political forums. But two fail at everything, they even beg to participate when not wanted, so fucking pathetic
[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, serif]and when wabash jumps in to tell me what a bad person I am while defending the 4 Muskebamas, my amusement rises to another level
to put it simply, I love being despised by the people who despise me in the political arena, I could not be happier. I can't even think of one redeeming factor any of them bring to this gambling site, save for maybe scum's fades (that's actually something substantive)
do they interact well with others?
do they bring something constructive?
do they post winners?
are they known for anything good?
now many posters might fit into 1, 2 or even 3 of those categories, but only a very few (maybe just two, the two I respect the least) sweep the board. The others may actually get along well with others away from the RR and political forums. But two fail at everything, they even beg to participate when not wanted, so fucking pathetic
[/FONT]
How silly and pathetic is this dipshit kid from Alaska?
Well, when it was pointed out in the political forum that he ran from this thread, he stated:
When it was then pointed out that the above statement is a laughable, absolute lie as he came back to post more dumb drivel, he responded:
What a pathetic, laughable, liar.
Well, when it was pointed out in the political forum that he ran from this thread, he stated:
When it was then pointed out that the above statement is a laughable, absolute lie as he came back to post more dumb drivel, he responded:
What a pathetic, laughable, liar.
Just for fun, walking down memory lane:
^ 95 days since the Sterling tape was released.
And:
Reality:
Sterling case is a novel legal obstacle course
But the string of courtroom losses and Sterling's inability to control his anger may mean little as Shelly Sterling tries to get Levanas to validate her $2-billion sale of the Clippers to former Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer. For the deal to go through, Sterling's wife of nearly 59 years needs the judge to:
— Validate the incapacity procedure she used to take over the family trust.
— Judge irrelevant her husband's subsequent dismantling of the same trust.
— Grant an extraordinary order that even an appellate court's intervention would be meaningless.
Experts say that the latter two issues, in particular, venture into novel legal ground. With limited precedent to guide him, Levanas will fall back on arcane provisions of California's probate code and case law that has little in common with one of the most lucrative deals in big league sports history.
And if Shelly Sterling's team loses on even one of the issues? Then, her lawyer Pierce O'Donnell conceded, the Clippers sale "can't go through immediately."
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-sterling-legal-analysis-20140728-story.html#page=1
Note: I pointed out this stupid little kid should have stopped posting on this topic on May 5 to save himself the continued embarrassment.
He persisted.
^ 95 days since the Sterling tape was released.
And:
Reality:
Sterling case is a novel legal obstacle course
But the string of courtroom losses and Sterling's inability to control his anger may mean little as Shelly Sterling tries to get Levanas to validate her $2-billion sale of the Clippers to former Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer. For the deal to go through, Sterling's wife of nearly 59 years needs the judge to:
— Validate the incapacity procedure she used to take over the family trust.
— Judge irrelevant her husband's subsequent dismantling of the same trust.
— Grant an extraordinary order that even an appellate court's intervention would be meaningless.
Experts say that the latter two issues, in particular, venture into novel legal ground. With limited precedent to guide him, Levanas will fall back on arcane provisions of California's probate code and case law that has little in common with one of the most lucrative deals in big league sports history.
And if Shelly Sterling's team loses on even one of the issues? Then, her lawyer Pierce O'Donnell conceded, the Clippers sale "can't go through immediately."
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-sterling-legal-analysis-20140728-story.html#page=1
Note: I pointed out this stupid little kid should have stopped posting on this topic on May 5 to save himself the continued embarrassment.
He persisted.
