Sanders is an independent really.
But it if he won the nomination the republican machine would be sending you bullshit articles and cartoons for you guys to spread around. If you remember, which I'm sure you don't, when Obama was going against hillary in the primary, the conservative media was complimenting Obama....because they hate the clintons....soon as Obama won....the loons started in on the crazy shit. Seriously, start thinking for yourself.
[h=2]Major Hillary Clinton Donor Announces Thousands of Layoffs[/h]BY: Andrew Stiles
May 28, 2015 3:14 pm
EMAIL
Major Hilary Clinton donor JPMorgan Chase announced Thursday it would lay off more than 5,000 employees over the next two years. The move would eliminate roughly two percent of the company’s workforce as part of an overhaul aimed at replacing human tellers with automated technology.
JPMorgan is the fourth-largest source of campaign contributions to Hillary Clinton over the course of her career. The company’s employees have donated almost $620,000 to the current Democratic frontrunner. CEO Jamie Dimon has given at least $8,700 to Hillary Clinton beginning in 1999, and donated $1,000 to Bill Clinton in 1995. JPMorgan has donated as much as $260,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
Thus continues another very bad week for Clinton donors. On Tuesday, senior officials at Clinton Foundation donor FIFA were indicted on corruption charges, some of which related to the controversial decision to allow Clinton Foundation donor Qatar host the World Cup in 2022. An estimated 1,200 workers have died during construction in the oil-rich Gulf nation, which recentlyimprisoned a group of BBC journalists invited to report on World Cup preparations.
May 28, 2015 3:14 pm
Major Hilary Clinton donor JPMorgan Chase announced Thursday it would lay off more than 5,000 employees over the next two years. The move would eliminate roughly two percent of the company’s workforce as part of an overhaul aimed at replacing human tellers with automated technology.
JPMorgan is the fourth-largest source of campaign contributions to Hillary Clinton over the course of her career. The company’s employees have donated almost $620,000 to the current Democratic frontrunner. CEO Jamie Dimon has given at least $8,700 to Hillary Clinton beginning in 1999, and donated $1,000 to Bill Clinton in 1995. JPMorgan has donated as much as $260,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
Thus continues another very bad week for Clinton donors. On Tuesday, senior officials at Clinton Foundation donor FIFA were indicted on corruption charges, some of which related to the controversial decision to allow Clinton Foundation donor Qatar host the World Cup in 2022. An estimated 1,200 workers have died during construction in the oil-rich Gulf nation, which recentlyimprisoned a group of BBC journalists invited to report on World Cup preparations.
[h=2]ANALYSIS: Stunning Lack of Diversity at Hillary Clinton Campaign Events[/h]BY: Andrew Stiles
May 26, 2015 4:43 pm
EMAIL
There is a stunning lack of racial diversity among the pre-screened “everyday Americans” at Hillary Clinton’s campaign events, a Free Beacon analysis found. Clinton plans to meet with minority women small business owners in South Carolina on Wednesday, but the roundtable events she has hosted since announcing for president on April 12 have been, for the most part, excruciatingly white. These photos, according to our analysis, speak for themselves:
Roundtable Discussion at Kirkwood Community College, Cedar Rapids, Iowa (April 14, 2015)
Analysis: White
Interaction with Everyday Americans at the Tremont Grille, Marshalltown, Iowa (April 15, 2015)
Analysis: Profoundly White
Small Business Roundtable, Norwalk, Iowa (April 15, 2015)
Analysis: White & Slightly Ginger
Roundtable Discussion at Whitney Brother Furniture, Keene, New Hampshire (April 20, 2015)
Analysis: Old & White
NHTI Roundtable in Concord, New Hampshire (April 21, 2015)
Analysis: Don’t Think Twice, It’s All White
Immigration Roundtable at Rancho High School, Las Vegas, Nevada (May 5, 2015)
Analysis: Diverse
Small Business Roundtable at Bikeworks, Cedar Falls, Iowa (May 19, 2015)
Analysis: Mostly White
Roundtable Event at Smuttynose Brewery In Hampton, New Hampshire (May 22, 2015)
Analysis: White & Beardy
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged 2016 Election, Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton, Parody, Satire,Trolling. Bookmark the permalink.
May 26, 2015 4:43 pm
AP
There is a stunning lack of racial diversity among the pre-screened “everyday Americans” at Hillary Clinton’s campaign events, a Free Beacon analysis found. Clinton plans to meet with minority women small business owners in South Carolina on Wednesday, but the roundtable events she has hosted since announcing for president on April 12 have been, for the most part, excruciatingly white. These photos, according to our analysis, speak for themselves:
Roundtable Discussion at Kirkwood Community College, Cedar Rapids, Iowa (April 14, 2015)
Analysis: White
Interaction with Everyday Americans at the Tremont Grille, Marshalltown, Iowa (April 15, 2015)
Analysis: Profoundly White
Small Business Roundtable, Norwalk, Iowa (April 15, 2015)
Analysis: White & Slightly Ginger
Roundtable Discussion at Whitney Brother Furniture, Keene, New Hampshire (April 20, 2015)
Analysis: Old & White
NHTI Roundtable in Concord, New Hampshire (April 21, 2015)
Analysis: Don’t Think Twice, It’s All White
Immigration Roundtable at Rancho High School, Las Vegas, Nevada (May 5, 2015)
Analysis: Diverse
Small Business Roundtable at Bikeworks, Cedar Falls, Iowa (May 19, 2015)
Analysis: Mostly White
Roundtable Event at Smuttynose Brewery In Hampton, New Hampshire (May 22, 2015)
Analysis: White & Beardy
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged 2016 Election, Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton, Parody, Satire,Trolling. Bookmark the permalink.
[h=2]The Hillary Clinton Benghazi Emails, Explained[/h]BY: Andrew Stiles
May 26, 2015 2:00 pm
EMAIL
You probably have some questions about emails Hillary Clinton decided to release on the Friday before Memorial Day weekend, but were afraid to ask. Here’s everything you need to know:
Hello?
Hey.
What’s up?
Not much. Did you hear about Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi emails?
Nope. I was visiting my grandmother at the retirement home.
Nice. How old is she?
Well, she’ll be 69 by the time the next president is sworn in.
Same as Hillary.
Oh. That’s cool, I guess.
Yeah.
So what’s the deal with the emails?
Thanks for asking. Last Friday, the State Department released some of the emails Hillary Clinton sent during her time as secretary of state.
Some?
Yeah, about 300 of them; more than 800 pages worth of documents.
That doesn’t seem like a lot.
It isn’t. This is just the first round of emails scheduled to be released between now and January 2016. It’s a tiny fraction of the 30,000 she turned over to the State Department. This batch consists of those related to the September 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.
Wait, if she was using a government email address, why does she have to “turn over” her emails to the State Department?
She didn’t use a State Department email address. She used a private account hosted on a private server she kept in her Washington, D.C., mansion.
That sounds pretty sketchy.
It is. The State Department’s freedom of information officer has said using a private account to conduct government business was “not acceptable.” Mike Morrell, former deputy director of the CIA, said Hillary’s decision to use a private server showed poor judgment, not least because foreign intelligence agencies were likely able to gain access to it.
Well, at least she didn’t send or receive any classified information on that account. Right?
Funny you should ask. Hillary told reporters earlier this year that didn’t email any classified information on her account. But it turns out that some of the information she received was formallydeemed classified on Friday, the same day the emails were released.
Interesting.
Yeah.
I think I heard something about Hillary deleting a bunch of her emails. Is that correct?
Yes. The emails handed over to the State Department have already been vetted by Hillary, her attorneys, her campaign aides, etc. She deleted the rest on the grounds that they were “personal” in nature.
Wait a minute. So there’s no point looking for a “smoking gun” in any of these emails being released to the public, right? If there was anything on that server likely to imperil her quest for power, she obviously deleted it.
Obviously.
And because there was no independent third party to review those emails, we’ll just have to take Hillary’s word that the “personal” emails she deleted were strictly personal. You know, about yoga classes and stuff. Right?
Right.
So, the best thing we can say about Hillary at this point is that she has yet to knowingly release incriminating information about herself, or to willingly disclose evidence of explicit corruption?
Pretty much.
That’s a pretty low bar. Doesn’t this set a terrible precedent for public official, and give them more incentive to conceal or destroy documents by proving that there are few, if any, practical consequences?
Yup.
So, what’s in the emails?
Glad you asked. Let’s start with Sidney Blumenthal. The emails show that Hillary was frequentlycorresponding with her “old friend” (and former Clinton administration aide) in the run-up to the Benghazi attacks. Blumenthal was essentially running a freelance intelligence operation in Libya and passing on information to Hillary, who would forward it to aides in the State Department and the White House. Turns out Blumenthal also had business associates who were hoping to cash in on the fall of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, and was receiving money from the Clinton Foundation and a number of other Clinton-allied groups at the time.
Sounds sketchy. Isn’t he the guy who kept promoting racially-tinged attacks against Barack Obama back in 2008?
That’s him.
Did any of the emails warn Hillary about the deteriorating security situation in Libya prior to the Benghazi attacks?
Yes, they did. Beginning in April 2011, more than a year before the attacks, Hillary received emails warning of “credible threats” to U.S. assets in the country, and made mention of written requests for beefed-up security measures.
However, as the Washington Examiner’s Byron York points out, there are strikingly few references (in the pre-screened batch of emails Hillary chose to release) to the deteriorating security situation in the months preceding the Benghazi attacks, such as an August 2012 cable from Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in the attacks, warning that U.S. assets were increasingly vulnerable to a “coordinated attack.”
Hours before the initial attack on the compound in Benghazi, which took place on the anniversary of the September 11th terror attacks, Hillary did not appear to express any concern about the security situation. Instead, she was emailing aides about a Bernard Henri-Levi film that had recently been featured at the Cannes Film Festival.
Has Hillary ever accepted any responsibility for the inadequate security in Benghazi?
Not really. In testimony before Congress, and in the pages of her failed memoir Hard Choices, Hillary insisted that she was unaware of the urgent requests for increased security in Benghazi.
Did Hillary ever mention Chris Stevens by name?
Sort of. In an email to aides, Hillary expressed concern about the death of “Chris Smith” and the important matter of when to publicly announce it. She presumably mixed up the names of Chris Stevens and Sean Smith, a State Department employee who was also killed in the attacks.
Did Hillary ever talk about her mysterious health scare?
She did. In one December 2012 email, Hillary joked about “nursing” a “cracked head.”
What else do the emails tell us about Hillary?
Well, we know that she’s a fan of NPR, and that she’s surrounded by people who worship the ground she walks on.
What do you mean?
In September 2012, Hillary was forwarded an email conversation among aides and friends—titled “Andrew Sullivan with the Hillary love”—that discussed some favorable pieces by blogger Andrew Sullivan and Boston Herald columnist Margery Eagan. In response to Eagan’s column, Roy Spence, one of Hillary’s top advertising strategists, wrote:
Yeah.
That reminds me. Are there any weirdly sexual situations described in the emails?
Actually, yes. Here’s how Hillary spokesman Philippe Reines described the scene of an October 2012 interview with the Wall Street Journal‘s Monica Langley in an email to Clinton aide Tom Nides:
I’m going to go throw up now.
Actually,that’s exactly what Nides wrote in response to Reines. But in his case, it was because he was “laughing too hard.”
What’s Hillary Clinton up to these days?
Her campaign website is selling a pantsuit T-shirt.
Isn’t there something sexist about Hillary’s ironic appropriation of female business attire?
Maybe.
None of this matters, does it? She’s going to be the next president, isn’t she?
Yeah, probably.
May 26, 2015 2:00 pm
What difference, at this point, does it make?
You probably have some questions about emails Hillary Clinton decided to release on the Friday before Memorial Day weekend, but were afraid to ask. Here’s everything you need to know:
Hello?
Hey.
What’s up?
Not much. Did you hear about Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi emails?
Nope. I was visiting my grandmother at the retirement home.
Nice. How old is she?
Well, she’ll be 69 by the time the next president is sworn in.
Same as Hillary.
Oh. That’s cool, I guess.
Yeah.
So what’s the deal with the emails?
Thanks for asking. Last Friday, the State Department released some of the emails Hillary Clinton sent during her time as secretary of state.
Some?
Yeah, about 300 of them; more than 800 pages worth of documents.
That doesn’t seem like a lot.
It isn’t. This is just the first round of emails scheduled to be released between now and January 2016. It’s a tiny fraction of the 30,000 she turned over to the State Department. This batch consists of those related to the September 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.
Wait, if she was using a government email address, why does she have to “turn over” her emails to the State Department?
She didn’t use a State Department email address. She used a private account hosted on a private server she kept in her Washington, D.C., mansion.
That sounds pretty sketchy.
It is. The State Department’s freedom of information officer has said using a private account to conduct government business was “not acceptable.” Mike Morrell, former deputy director of the CIA, said Hillary’s decision to use a private server showed poor judgment, not least because foreign intelligence agencies were likely able to gain access to it.
Well, at least she didn’t send or receive any classified information on that account. Right?
Funny you should ask. Hillary told reporters earlier this year that didn’t email any classified information on her account. But it turns out that some of the information she received was formallydeemed classified on Friday, the same day the emails were released.
Interesting.
Yeah.
I think I heard something about Hillary deleting a bunch of her emails. Is that correct?
Yes. The emails handed over to the State Department have already been vetted by Hillary, her attorneys, her campaign aides, etc. She deleted the rest on the grounds that they were “personal” in nature.
Wait a minute. So there’s no point looking for a “smoking gun” in any of these emails being released to the public, right? If there was anything on that server likely to imperil her quest for power, she obviously deleted it.
Obviously.
And because there was no independent third party to review those emails, we’ll just have to take Hillary’s word that the “personal” emails she deleted were strictly personal. You know, about yoga classes and stuff. Right?
Right.
So, the best thing we can say about Hillary at this point is that she has yet to knowingly release incriminating information about herself, or to willingly disclose evidence of explicit corruption?
Pretty much.
That’s a pretty low bar. Doesn’t this set a terrible precedent for public official, and give them more incentive to conceal or destroy documents by proving that there are few, if any, practical consequences?
Yup.
So, what’s in the emails?
Glad you asked. Let’s start with Sidney Blumenthal. The emails show that Hillary was frequentlycorresponding with her “old friend” (and former Clinton administration aide) in the run-up to the Benghazi attacks. Blumenthal was essentially running a freelance intelligence operation in Libya and passing on information to Hillary, who would forward it to aides in the State Department and the White House. Turns out Blumenthal also had business associates who were hoping to cash in on the fall of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, and was receiving money from the Clinton Foundation and a number of other Clinton-allied groups at the time.
Sounds sketchy. Isn’t he the guy who kept promoting racially-tinged attacks against Barack Obama back in 2008?
That’s him.
Did any of the emails warn Hillary about the deteriorating security situation in Libya prior to the Benghazi attacks?
Yes, they did. Beginning in April 2011, more than a year before the attacks, Hillary received emails warning of “credible threats” to U.S. assets in the country, and made mention of written requests for beefed-up security measures.
However, as the Washington Examiner’s Byron York points out, there are strikingly few references (in the pre-screened batch of emails Hillary chose to release) to the deteriorating security situation in the months preceding the Benghazi attacks, such as an August 2012 cable from Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in the attacks, warning that U.S. assets were increasingly vulnerable to a “coordinated attack.”
Hours before the initial attack on the compound in Benghazi, which took place on the anniversary of the September 11th terror attacks, Hillary did not appear to express any concern about the security situation. Instead, she was emailing aides about a Bernard Henri-Levi film that had recently been featured at the Cannes Film Festival.
Has Hillary ever accepted any responsibility for the inadequate security in Benghazi?
Not really. In testimony before Congress, and in the pages of her failed memoir Hard Choices, Hillary insisted that she was unaware of the urgent requests for increased security in Benghazi.
Did Hillary ever mention Chris Stevens by name?
Sort of. In an email to aides, Hillary expressed concern about the death of “Chris Smith” and the important matter of when to publicly announce it. She presumably mixed up the names of Chris Stevens and Sean Smith, a State Department employee who was also killed in the attacks.
Did Hillary ever talk about her mysterious health scare?
She did. In one December 2012 email, Hillary joked about “nursing” a “cracked head.”
What else do the emails tell us about Hillary?
Well, we know that she’s a fan of NPR, and that she’s surrounded by people who worship the ground she walks on.
What do you mean?
In September 2012, Hillary was forwarded an email conversation among aides and friends—titled “Andrew Sullivan with the Hillary love”—that discussed some favorable pieces by blogger Andrew Sullivan and Boston Herald columnist Margery Eagan. In response to Eagan’s column, Roy Spence, one of Hillary’s top advertising strategists, wrote:
This is simply painfully honest on her part and a moment in time where Higher Purpose shines a bright light on Higher Ground…Higher Ground is where all great solutions and triumphs are found and scaled…HRC-once again is taking people there-whether they ever thought they ever want to go there or not…
Um…
Yeah.
That reminds me. Are there any weirdly sexual situations described in the emails?
Actually, yes. Here’s how Hillary spokesman Philippe Reines described the scene of an October 2012 interview with the Wall Street Journal‘s Monica Langley in an email to Clinton aide Tom Nides:
Tom, she moved that yellow chair as close as it went. Knee to knee. Amazed she didn’t try knee in between knee. And if that wasn’t enough, she leaned forward. More like a pivot, as far as her torso could fold forward to minimize the space between their heads. Was like the dental hygienist rolling around the floor to get the best access to your mouth depending on what tooth she was trying to get access to I’ve never seen a Westerner invade her space like that And even the non Westerners I’ve seen do it based on cultural differences have been only briefly to greet, This went on like that for 51 minutes – unacceptable in any culture. I don’t even think you see that behavior among any type of mammal.
The touching the leg and repeatedly calling her ‘Hillary’ was just gravy.
But it was wonderful. One of the best interviews I’ve ever witnessed. Wish it were on live tv.
According to an attached transcript of the interview, at one point, Langley leaned in and grabbed Hillary’s knee, saying: “Oh Hillary, what do you eat? Drink? Dream about when you sleep?” Then she grabbed Hillary’s leg again, while everyone present laughed “awkwardly.” That’s when Langley asked: “Hill, can I ride on your lap to the White House?”The touching the leg and repeatedly calling her ‘Hillary’ was just gravy.
But it was wonderful. One of the best interviews I’ve ever witnessed. Wish it were on live tv.
I’m going to go throw up now.
Actually,that’s exactly what Nides wrote in response to Reines. But in his case, it was because he was “laughing too hard.”
What’s Hillary Clinton up to these days?
Her campaign website is selling a pantsuit T-shirt.
Isn’t there something sexist about Hillary’s ironic appropriation of female business attire?
Maybe.
None of this matters, does it? She’s going to be the next president, isn’t she?
Yeah, probably.
The former president of the United States agreed to accept a lifetime achievement award at the June 2014 event after Ms. Nemcova offered a $500,000 contribution to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. The donation, made late last year after the foundation sent the charity an invoice, amounted to almost a quarter of the evening’s net proceeds — enough to build 10 preschools in Indonesia.
The Clinton Foundation had rejected the Happy Hearts Fund invitation more than once, until there was a thinly veiled solicitation and then the offer of an honorarium,
...
“This is primarily a small but telling example of the way the Clintons operate,” said Doug White, who directs the master’s program in fund-raising management at Columbia University. “The model has responsibility; she paid a high price for a feel-good moment with Bill Clinton. But he was riding the back of this small charity for what? A half-million bucks? I find it — what would be the word? — distasteful.”
====
What an absolute scum bag.
The Clinton Foundation had rejected the Happy Hearts Fund invitation more than once, until there was a thinly veiled solicitation and then the offer of an honorarium,
...
“This is primarily a small but telling example of the way the Clintons operate,” said Doug White, who directs the master’s program in fund-raising management at Columbia University. “The model has responsibility; she paid a high price for a feel-good moment with Bill Clinton. But he was riding the back of this small charity for what? A half-million bucks? I find it — what would be the word? — distasteful.”
====
What an absolute scum bag.
Bill Clinton appeared at a fundraising gala for Petra Nemcova's charity only after the model offered $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation, the natural disaster organization's former executive director has claimed
.
Sue Veres Royal said the former president had rejected Nemcova's invitation to appear at the Happy Hearts Fund gala for the 10th anniversary of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami more than once
.
But that changed when Clinton was offered 'a thinly veiled solicitation and then the offer of an honorarium' by Nemcova for the June 2014 gala, Veres Royal claimed
.
Here is your daily "spam" article that arrived via email from Mother Jones:
[h=1]Hillary Clinton Oversaw US Arms Deals to Clinton Foundation Donors[/h]
The Saudi transaction is just one example of nations and companies that had donated to the Clinton Foundation seeing an increase in arms deals while Hillary Clinton oversaw the State Department
===
Good thing those right wing spammers are out in full force!
[h=1]Hillary Clinton Oversaw US Arms Deals to Clinton Foundation Donors[/h]
The Saudi transaction is just one example of nations and companies that had donated to the Clinton Foundation seeing an increase in arms deals while Hillary Clinton oversaw the State Department
===
Good thing those right wing spammers are out in full force!
RIP
[h=1]BREAKING NEWS: Joe Biden's son Beau dies aged 46 after battle with brain cancer[/h]
.
+5
'Broken hearts': The Biden family announced the death of Beau Biden, 46, in a statement Saturday evening
+5
Father and son: Beau is pictured above in 2008 with his father, Joe Biden, who was then a candidate for Vice President
.
[h=1]BREAKING NEWS: Joe Biden's son Beau dies aged 46 after battle with brain cancer[/h]
- Death of Vice President's son announced by family 9:45pm Saturday
- Beau Biden served in Iraq and later became Delaware's Attorney General
- Biden family statement called Beau 'finest man any of us have ever known
.
+5
'Broken hearts': The Biden family announced the death of Beau Biden, 46, in a statement Saturday evening
+5
Father and son: Beau is pictured above in 2008 with his father, Joe Biden, who was then a candidate for Vice President
.
[h=1]FIORINA: HILLARY’S LEADERSHIP HAS PLACED US IN GRAVE DANGER AROUND THE WORLD[/h]
by PAM KEY31 May 2015330
On this weekends “Fox News Sunday With Chris Wallace,” Republican presidential candidate and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina said Hillary Clinton’s “leadership as secretary of state has placed us in grave danger around the world.”
Fiorina said “I come from a world where titles are just titles and talk is just talk. The questions I’m raising about Hillary Clinton, I take no delight in them. I’m concerned. you know, it is entirely legitimate when someone is running for the presidency of the United States to ask whether they are being transparent, whether they are trustworthy, whether they have a track record of leadership. Hillary Clinton has demonstrated over and over she is not transparent. Her leadership as secretary of state has placed us in grave danger around the world. These are entirely legitimate questions and questions I would ask of her on the general debate stage. questions that must be asked of her because the American people need to hear her answers.”
“She and bill Clinton are the personification of what 82 percent of Americans now consider the professional political class that is more concerned about preserving its power and its privilege than it is about doing the people’s business,” she continued. “It’s why 82 percent of the American people now think we need people from outside of the professional political class to serve in public office. Ours was intended to be a citizen government, by, for and of the people. so, she will clearly be the nominee of the Democrat party and our nominee must take the fight to her because we need to defeat Hillary Clinton in 2016. Then we need someone in the oval office who can actually do the job.”
2669
5
515
by PAM KEY31 May 2015330
On this weekends “Fox News Sunday With Chris Wallace,” Republican presidential candidate and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina said Hillary Clinton’s “leadership as secretary of state has placed us in grave danger around the world.”
Fiorina said “I come from a world where titles are just titles and talk is just talk. The questions I’m raising about Hillary Clinton, I take no delight in them. I’m concerned. you know, it is entirely legitimate when someone is running for the presidency of the United States to ask whether they are being transparent, whether they are trustworthy, whether they have a track record of leadership. Hillary Clinton has demonstrated over and over she is not transparent. Her leadership as secretary of state has placed us in grave danger around the world. These are entirely legitimate questions and questions I would ask of her on the general debate stage. questions that must be asked of her because the American people need to hear her answers.”
“She and bill Clinton are the personification of what 82 percent of Americans now consider the professional political class that is more concerned about preserving its power and its privilege than it is about doing the people’s business,” she continued. “It’s why 82 percent of the American people now think we need people from outside of the professional political class to serve in public office. Ours was intended to be a citizen government, by, for and of the people. so, she will clearly be the nominee of the Democrat party and our nominee must take the fight to her because we need to defeat Hillary Clinton in 2016. Then we need someone in the oval office who can actually do the job.”
WND EXCLUSIVE
KATHLEEN WILLEY: HILLARY A 'MONEY-HUNGRY HYPOCRITE'
Bill 'showing early signs of dementia'
Published: 3 hours agoimage: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/01/Joe-Kovacs_avatar.jpg
JOE KOVACS About | Email | Archive
Kathleen Willey, the former White House aide who claims President Bill Clinton sexually assaulted her in 1993 during his first term, now suspects the former president suffers from dementia, and calls Hillary Clinton a “money-hungry” hypocrite who looks “awfully haggard” and is the “worst role model for a wife and a mother and a politician.”
Willey, author of the book “Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton,” made her scathing comments in an interview Sunday night on Aaron Klein Investigative Radio, broadcast on New York’s AM 970 and Philadelphia 990 AM, as well as online.
She is now seriously questioning the mental health of both of the Clintons.
“[Hillary] is really looking awfully haggard these days,” Willey said.
“After watching [Bill's] performance with [NBC News' Cynthia] McFadden, when he said that I’ve gotta pay my bills, I think he’s showing early signs of dementia or something. He’s not the old Bill Clinton that we all remember. I mean, he was all over the place. Now you’re seeing clips of [Hillary] talking to herself all the time. I think that I want somebody in there who knows what they’re doing, and money isn’t the No. 1 issue for them. They have enough money. They made $30 million … in the last 15 months on speaking engagements. Isn’t that enough?”
What do YOU think? Is Kathleen Willey right that Bill Clinton has ‘dementia?’ Sound off in the WND Poll!
Speaking of Hillary Clinton’s behavior during those White House years, Klein said, “There’s no way Hillary did not know what was going on, that women were being abused and accosted by her husband. You took it further on my show. You said Hillary was the war on women.”
“She’s absolutely unqualified to run this country,” stated Willey. “Just look at something as simple as her judgment. … I question her judgment on a number of issues when it comes to being the president. She enabled his behavior. It’s as simple as that. She looked the other way. She might throw a tantrum, but she enabled it to happen again and again and again and again. Then she chooses to go after the women that he hooked up with to ruin them again and again and again and again. That’s how it works. I don’t see how anybody can respect a woman like that, especially another woman. She is the worst role model for a wife and a mother and a politician, anything. … She is a hypocrite.”
Read the book that indicts Hillary in her own words: “Hillary Unhinged”
Regarding finances, Willey said Hillary’s desire for wealth overrides her judgment:
“She is money-hungry, absolutely … She says they were dead broke? … They’ve got money hand over fist. They just can’t seem to make enough. And she doesn’t see any reason whatsoever that there’s anything wrong with this. That’s what bothers me. Where’s the woman’s judgment? She has no sense of good judgment whatsoever. I don’t want that woman to be my president.”
Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.
Given a choice between Democrat candidates, Willey came down firmly in the camp of former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley.
“If I were a Democrat – which I’m not anymore for obvious reasons – if it came down to a choice between Hillary Clinton and O’Malley, I would vote for him in a New York minute. … He’s a good family man, he loves his wife. … I don’t agree with all his policies, but he just seems to me to be a regular, normal kind of guy. I think he was well-liked in Maryland. … He seems to be at least a moderate.”
Willey has high praise for Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina, the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard.
“When it comes down to my choice, the more I hear Carly Fiorina talk, the more I like her. I mean, there’s a role model for you,” she said.
“I would love to work on her campaign. She doesn’t hedge when she’s asked questions, she gives you straight answers, she’s direct, she’s not afraid of anybody. … I mean, she’s just got more cajones than everyone in Washington combined. … I think she’s great, I think she’s wonderful. …
“She didn’t get where she got on the coattails of other men like Hillary did. She worked her way up. … She did it on her own. I have got a lot of admiration for that woman. … Women in this country who want a woman for president ought to be paying a whole lot more attention to Carly Fiorina than to Hillary Clinton, because Hillary Clinton has nothing to offer. She won’t talk, she won’t answer questions, she hides behind the Secret Service, I haven’t heard one innovative idea come out of her mouth since all of this started. What does she have to offer this country except for the fact that she thinks that she’s entitled to this? What has she accomplished? I can’t think of a thing.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/kathleen-willey-hillary-a-money-hungry-hypocrite/#K0KWWqwKOBXclouQ.99
KATHLEEN WILLEY: HILLARY A 'MONEY-HUNGRY HYPOCRITE'
Bill 'showing early signs of dementia'
Published: 3 hours agoimage: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/01/Joe-Kovacs_avatar.jpg
Kathleen Willey, the former White House aide who claims President Bill Clinton sexually assaulted her in 1993 during his first term, now suspects the former president suffers from dementia, and calls Hillary Clinton a “money-hungry” hypocrite who looks “awfully haggard” and is the “worst role model for a wife and a mother and a politician.”
Willey, author of the book “Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton,” made her scathing comments in an interview Sunday night on Aaron Klein Investigative Radio, broadcast on New York’s AM 970 and Philadelphia 990 AM, as well as online.
She is now seriously questioning the mental health of both of the Clintons.
“[Hillary] is really looking awfully haggard these days,” Willey said.
“After watching [Bill's] performance with [NBC News' Cynthia] McFadden, when he said that I’ve gotta pay my bills, I think he’s showing early signs of dementia or something. He’s not the old Bill Clinton that we all remember. I mean, he was all over the place. Now you’re seeing clips of [Hillary] talking to herself all the time. I think that I want somebody in there who knows what they’re doing, and money isn’t the No. 1 issue for them. They have enough money. They made $30 million … in the last 15 months on speaking engagements. Isn’t that enough?”
What do YOU think? Is Kathleen Willey right that Bill Clinton has ‘dementia?’ Sound off in the WND Poll!
Speaking of Hillary Clinton’s behavior during those White House years, Klein said, “There’s no way Hillary did not know what was going on, that women were being abused and accosted by her husband. You took it further on my show. You said Hillary was the war on women.”
“She’s absolutely unqualified to run this country,” stated Willey. “Just look at something as simple as her judgment. … I question her judgment on a number of issues when it comes to being the president. She enabled his behavior. It’s as simple as that. She looked the other way. She might throw a tantrum, but she enabled it to happen again and again and again and again. Then she chooses to go after the women that he hooked up with to ruin them again and again and again and again. That’s how it works. I don’t see how anybody can respect a woman like that, especially another woman. She is the worst role model for a wife and a mother and a politician, anything. … She is a hypocrite.”
Read the book that indicts Hillary in her own words: “Hillary Unhinged”
Regarding finances, Willey said Hillary’s desire for wealth overrides her judgment:
“She is money-hungry, absolutely … She says they were dead broke? … They’ve got money hand over fist. They just can’t seem to make enough. And she doesn’t see any reason whatsoever that there’s anything wrong with this. That’s what bothers me. Where’s the woman’s judgment? She has no sense of good judgment whatsoever. I don’t want that woman to be my president.”
Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.
Given a choice between Democrat candidates, Willey came down firmly in the camp of former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley.
“If I were a Democrat – which I’m not anymore for obvious reasons – if it came down to a choice between Hillary Clinton and O’Malley, I would vote for him in a New York minute. … He’s a good family man, he loves his wife. … I don’t agree with all his policies, but he just seems to me to be a regular, normal kind of guy. I think he was well-liked in Maryland. … He seems to be at least a moderate.”
Willey has high praise for Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina, the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard.
“When it comes down to my choice, the more I hear Carly Fiorina talk, the more I like her. I mean, there’s a role model for you,” she said.
“I would love to work on her campaign. She doesn’t hedge when she’s asked questions, she gives you straight answers, she’s direct, she’s not afraid of anybody. … I mean, she’s just got more cajones than everyone in Washington combined. … I think she’s great, I think she’s wonderful. …
“She didn’t get where she got on the coattails of other men like Hillary did. She worked her way up. … She did it on her own. I have got a lot of admiration for that woman. … Women in this country who want a woman for president ought to be paying a whole lot more attention to Carly Fiorina than to Hillary Clinton, because Hillary Clinton has nothing to offer. She won’t talk, she won’t answer questions, she hides behind the Secret Service, I haven’t heard one innovative idea come out of her mouth since all of this started. What does she have to offer this country except for the fact that she thinks that she’s entitled to this? What has she accomplished? I can’t think of a thing.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/kathleen-willey-hillary-a-money-hungry-hypocrite/#K0KWWqwKOBXclouQ.99
[h=2]Bill Clinton’s Irish Billionaire Buddy Under Fire for Sweetheart Loan Deal[/h]Media tycoon wins legal injunction to ban media from reporting on scandal
BY: Andrew Stiles
May 29, 2015 4:14 pm
SHARE
TWEET
EMAIL
Irish billionaire and Bill Clinton crony Denis O’Brien is under fire in his home country (although he technically resides in Malta for tax purposes) over an alleged sweetheart loan deal with the publicly-owned Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (IBRC).
The controversy erupted after Catherine Murphy, an independent members of the Irish parliament, discussed some details of the loan arrangement, which involved a “verbal agreement” with former IBRC chief executive Mike Aynsley and an unusually low interest rate, in a speech to members on May 6.
Two weeks later, Ireland’s state-owned broadcaster, RTÉ, was preparing to publish a story outlining the terms of O’Briens loan agreement in greater detail, but were prevented from doing so after O’Brien won a court injunction, citing the need to protect confidential financial information.
For this reason, few Irish media outlets reported on remarks Murphy made on Friday in another speech to Parliament, outlining the loan agreement in more detail. Because IBRC is owned by the state, Murphy argued, the terms of the loan were a matter of public interest. O’Brien was reportedly paying an extraordinarily low rate of 1.25 percent, well short of the standard commercial lending rate of 7.5 percent.
A story posted on the RTÉ website Friday contained the following disclaimer: “RTÉ is legally restricted from reporting what [Murphy] said, because to do so would breach the injunction already granted against it.” O’Brien’s lawyers, meanwhile, have argued that the injunction pertains to all Irish media outlets, some of which happen to be owned by O’Brien (and have yet to cover the story).
In recent years, O’Brien has developed a close personal friendship—and profitable business relationship—with former President Bill Clinton. O’Brien has organized a number of speaking gigs for the former president, including a September 2010 event in Dublin after which O’Brien donated as much as $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. Several week later, Clinton received $225,000 for speech hosted by O’Brien’s telecom conglomerate, the Digital Group.
This was around the same time that Digicel was applying for lucrative State Department grants to provide mobile payment services in earthquake-ravaged Haiti. Digicel would ultimately be awarded millions in U.S. taxpayer funds for its work in Haiti, which would help Digicel capture nearly 80 percent of the Haitian mobile phone market, making it the company’s most profitable network.
Most recently, O’Brien partnered with Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation to build a luxury Marriott hotel in Port-au-Prince. Reports suggest that workers involved in the hotel’s construction were paid significantly less than advertised. Just something to keep in mind whenever the Clintons’ defend their foundation by citing the “good work” they do in places like Haiti.
O’Brien is no stranger to allegations of corruption. In 2011, following a 14-year investigation into political corruption, an Irish judge accused O’Brien and former a communications minister of colluding in the mid-1990s to help O’Brien secure lucrative mobile phone contracts that would help him launch his communications empire.
The investigation found evidence that the communications minister, Michael Lowry, had provided O’Brien with privileged information, and had engaged in “irregular interactions with interested parties at [the] most sensitive stages” of the government’s deliberation. O’Brien, who was found to have funneled at least $170,000 to Lowry via “clandestine” transactions, denied any wronging and was never charged with a crime.
With friends like these…
BY: Andrew Stiles
May 29, 2015 4:14 pm
SHARE
TWEET
Bill Clinton and Denis O'Brien in Haiti. (AP)
Irish billionaire and Bill Clinton crony Denis O’Brien is under fire in his home country (although he technically resides in Malta for tax purposes) over an alleged sweetheart loan deal with the publicly-owned Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (IBRC).
The controversy erupted after Catherine Murphy, an independent members of the Irish parliament, discussed some details of the loan arrangement, which involved a “verbal agreement” with former IBRC chief executive Mike Aynsley and an unusually low interest rate, in a speech to members on May 6.
Two weeks later, Ireland’s state-owned broadcaster, RTÉ, was preparing to publish a story outlining the terms of O’Briens loan agreement in greater detail, but were prevented from doing so after O’Brien won a court injunction, citing the need to protect confidential financial information.
For this reason, few Irish media outlets reported on remarks Murphy made on Friday in another speech to Parliament, outlining the loan agreement in more detail. Because IBRC is owned by the state, Murphy argued, the terms of the loan were a matter of public interest. O’Brien was reportedly paying an extraordinarily low rate of 1.25 percent, well short of the standard commercial lending rate of 7.5 percent.
A story posted on the RTÉ website Friday contained the following disclaimer: “RTÉ is legally restricted from reporting what [Murphy] said, because to do so would breach the injunction already granted against it.” O’Brien’s lawyers, meanwhile, have argued that the injunction pertains to all Irish media outlets, some of which happen to be owned by O’Brien (and have yet to cover the story).
In recent years, O’Brien has developed a close personal friendship—and profitable business relationship—with former President Bill Clinton. O’Brien has organized a number of speaking gigs for the former president, including a September 2010 event in Dublin after which O’Brien donated as much as $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. Several week later, Clinton received $225,000 for speech hosted by O’Brien’s telecom conglomerate, the Digital Group.
This was around the same time that Digicel was applying for lucrative State Department grants to provide mobile payment services in earthquake-ravaged Haiti. Digicel would ultimately be awarded millions in U.S. taxpayer funds for its work in Haiti, which would help Digicel capture nearly 80 percent of the Haitian mobile phone market, making it the company’s most profitable network.
Most recently, O’Brien partnered with Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation to build a luxury Marriott hotel in Port-au-Prince. Reports suggest that workers involved in the hotel’s construction were paid significantly less than advertised. Just something to keep in mind whenever the Clintons’ defend their foundation by citing the “good work” they do in places like Haiti.
O’Brien is no stranger to allegations of corruption. In 2011, following a 14-year investigation into political corruption, an Irish judge accused O’Brien and former a communications minister of colluding in the mid-1990s to help O’Brien secure lucrative mobile phone contracts that would help him launch his communications empire.
The investigation found evidence that the communications minister, Michael Lowry, had provided O’Brien with privileged information, and had engaged in “irregular interactions with interested parties at [the] most sensitive stages” of the government’s deliberation. O’Brien, who was found to have funneled at least $170,000 to Lowry via “clandestine” transactions, denied any wronging and was never charged with a crime.
With friends like these…
[h=1]SALON: ‘CLINTON CASH’ DONATIONS FROM 20 FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS THAT HILLARY WON’T ANSWER[/h]
REUTERS/Mike Blake
by BREITBART NEWS31 May 2015319
Editor’s Note: This story first appeared in Salon. We reprint in part here.
Among all the rivers of money that have flowed to the Clinton family, one seems to raise the biggest national security questions of all: the stream of cash that came from 20 foreign governments who relied on weapons export approvals from Hillary Clinton’s State Department.
Federal law designates the secretary of state as “responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales” of arms, military hardware and services to foreign countries. In practice, that meant that Clinton was charged with rejecting or approving weapons deals — and when it came to Clinton Foundation donors, Hillary Clinton’s State Department did a whole lot of approving.
While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clinton’s three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.
1426
6
163
by BREITBART NEWS31 May 2015319
Editor’s Note: This story first appeared in Salon. We reprint in part here.
Among all the rivers of money that have flowed to the Clinton family, one seems to raise the biggest national security questions of all: the stream of cash that came from 20 foreign governments who relied on weapons export approvals from Hillary Clinton’s State Department.
Federal law designates the secretary of state as “responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales” of arms, military hardware and services to foreign countries. In practice, that meant that Clinton was charged with rejecting or approving weapons deals — and when it came to Clinton Foundation donors, Hillary Clinton’s State Department did a whole lot of approving.
While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clinton’s three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.
Once again the Tard has nothing to refute anything just trolling as usual. Too funny. Article after article being generated by journalists and researchers and he ignores it all. You can't make this stuff up and if the number of articles posted on this thread alone were about a Republican he would be on the other side of the fence. Trouble is his fence is run down, full of knot holes, unclimbable and would collapse if a bird landed on it. It is not the spammers who are out in full force it is those who are looking into Hillary's past, present and future. She has a bullseye on her back and she knows it but apparently the Tard does not. When hundreds of dots all point in the same direction only a fool would ignore them.
