toThree Percenters (III%ers) for Constitutional Troops and Law EnforcementYesterday at 12:31am ·
Advertisement on Craig List > 50 dollars to sit in audience .. Media did not show empty seats .. see link ...
DNCWalkout – In what looks to actually be the death of the Democratic Party thousands of DNC attendees marched out of the Convention during Hillary’s speech.
This is an exhilarating time to be alive. 2016 is the year that America took its power back from the Establishment.
Super Delegates have stolen the nomination from Bernie Sanders and tried to do the same to Donald Trump. The only difference was that Trump won by such a large margin that the GOP could not get away with stealing the Republican nomination from him.
Both parties’ delegates were quoted saying the will of the people doesn’t matter. The only thing that the establishment cares about is what the establishment wants. Tonight they learned that the people will not go along with that.
It will be hard to win a presidential election with only 25% of the nation’s voters backing Hillary. ...
..... Video https://therealstrategy.com/dncwalkout-dnc-audience-marched-out-hillary/#.V5puWbRd4QM.facebook
URGENT - Seat fillers needed for DNC tonight (Wells Fargo Center) hide this posting
© craigslist - Map data © OpenStreetMap
compensation: $50
Seat fillers needed for DNC proceedings tonight should some delegates decide to walk out. Will need to be available for interviews promoting unity within the Democrat party. Will be conducting interviews near the media tent for consideration. Please arrive early as primetime coverage starts at 9PM.
© craigslist - Map data © OpenStreetMap
compensation: $50
Seat fillers needed for DNC proceedings tonight should some delegates decide to walk out. Will need to be available for interviews promoting unity within the Democrat party. Will be conducting interviews near the media tent for consideration. Please arrive early as primetime coverage starts at 9PM.
The IRS confirmed it would investigate accusations of corrupt “pay-to-play” practices at the Clinton Foundation brought by over 60 Republican lawmakers who asked the agency to review potential “public corruption” in the organization.
In a July 22 letter, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen wrote to Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R., Tenn.), who is leading the probe, saying he had referred the congressional charges to the agency’s Exempt Organizations Program based in Dallas.
Maybe Koskinen can lure Lois Lerner out of retirement to help with the investigation.
In a July 22 letter, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen wrote to Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R., Tenn.), who is leading the probe, saying he had referred the congressional charges to the agency’s Exempt Organizations Program based in Dallas.
Maybe Koskinen can lure Lois Lerner out of retirement to help with the investigation.
from the above (1996)
[SIZE=+0]Hillary Clinton tells New Zealand television that she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. At the time of Mrs. Clinton's birth, Hillary was an unknown beekeeper.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0]Senator Bob Kerrey, chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, tells Esquire that Clinton is "an unusually good liar."[/SIZE]
[h=5]TRAIN[/h]21 mins ·
#TRUMPTRAIN
July 30: Hillary just can't get crowds in blue Pennsyvlania, forces attendees to sign Loyalty Oath
Hillary Clinton's speeches and events are struggling to fill seats after the convention in the key swing state of Pennsylvania. She had to bring in Mark…
PRNTLY.COM
#TRUMPTRAIN
July 30: Hillary just can't get crowds in blue Pennsyvlania, forces attendees to sign Loyalty Oath
Hillary Clinton's speeches and events are struggling to fill seats after the convention in the key swing state of Pennsylvania. She had to bring in Mark…
PRNTLY.COM
[h=1]Clinton Campaign Computers Also Hacked[/h]SHARE
TWEET
EMAIL
BY: Jack Heretik
July 29, 2016 6:57 pm
Hillary Clinton’s campaign computer networks were also hacked in cyber attacks on Democrats, according to Reuters.
Coming in the wake of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee both being hacked, suspicions have risen that the Russian government may be behind the cyber attacks in order to help Donald Trump’s campaign. The Department of Justice is investigating.
The Clinton campaign and the Department of Justice had no comment as to the latest claim.
Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic Party has had to deal with fallout from the hacking of the national party’s computers. Many of the emails published by Wikileaks showed senior Democratic Party personnel conspiring against Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) during the primary. As a result, the chairwoman of the DNC, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D., Fla.) was forced to resign.
Criticism has also been directed toward Trump for saying that he hopes the Russians do find more emails of Clinton’s and that Trump has made the Republican Party more friendly towards Russia.
TWEET
Hillary Clinton / AP
BY: Jack Heretik
July 29, 2016 6:57 pm
Hillary Clinton’s campaign computer networks were also hacked in cyber attacks on Democrats, according to Reuters.
Coming in the wake of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee both being hacked, suspicions have risen that the Russian government may be behind the cyber attacks in order to help Donald Trump’s campaign. The Department of Justice is investigating.
The involvement of the Justice Department’s national security division is a sign that the Obama administration has concluded that the hacking was state sponsored, individuals with knowledge of the investigation said.
What content may have been hacked is unknown so far.
The Clinton campaign and the Department of Justice had no comment as to the latest claim.
Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic Party has had to deal with fallout from the hacking of the national party’s computers. Many of the emails published by Wikileaks showed senior Democratic Party personnel conspiring against Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) during the primary. As a result, the chairwoman of the DNC, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D., Fla.) was forced to resign.
Criticism has also been directed toward Trump for saying that he hopes the Russians do find more emails of Clinton’s and that Trump has made the Republican Party more friendly towards Russia.
[h=1]Julian Assange; "Next leak will lead to arrest of Hillary Clinton" 7/27/16[/h] https://youtube.com/watch?v=xh9R_dbYVAs
[h=1]NY Post: Report Raises Questions About ‘Clinton Cash’ from Russians During ‘Reset’[/h]
AP PHoto
by BREITBART NEWS31 Jul 20161,237
From the NY Post Laura Italiano writes:
A report out Monday, “From Russia With Money — Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset and Cronyism,” raises serious questions about the cash connections between the Clintons and participants in the State Department’s failed five-year effort to improve, or “reset,” US-Russia relations during Hillary’s reign as secretary of state.
Key players in a main component of the reset — a Moscow-based Silicon Valley-styled campus for developing biomed, space, nuclear and IT technologies called “Skolkovo” — poured tens of millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation, the report by journalist Peter Schweizer alleges.
As the Obama administration’s top diplomat, Hillary Clinton was at the center of US efforts on the reset in general and Skolkovo in particular, Schweizer argues.
Yet, “Of the 28 US, European and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors” or sponsored speeches by former President Bill Clinton, Schweizer told The Post.
“It raises the question — do you need to pay money to sit at the table?”
[/FONT][/COLOR]
8745
6
by BREITBART NEWS31 Jul 20161,237
[h=2]SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER[/h]
From the NY Post Laura Italiano writes:
There’s more “Clinton Cash” trouble for Hillary.
[FONT=Arial !important]VIDEO: CLINTON: CLEARLY SOME CHANGES TO CGI IF HILLARY WINS
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)]
[FONT=Arial !important]VIDEO: CLINTON: CLEARLY SOME CHANGES TO CGI IF HILLARY WINS
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)]
A report out Monday, “From Russia With Money — Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset and Cronyism,” raises serious questions about the cash connections between the Clintons and participants in the State Department’s failed five-year effort to improve, or “reset,” US-Russia relations during Hillary’s reign as secretary of state.
Key players in a main component of the reset — a Moscow-based Silicon Valley-styled campus for developing biomed, space, nuclear and IT technologies called “Skolkovo” — poured tens of millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation, the report by journalist Peter Schweizer alleges.
As the Obama administration’s top diplomat, Hillary Clinton was at the center of US efforts on the reset in general and Skolkovo in particular, Schweizer argues.
Yet, “Of the 28 US, European and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors” or sponsored speeches by former President Bill Clinton, Schweizer told The Post.
“It raises the question — do you need to pay money to sit at the table?”
[h=1]Report: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Mgr John Podesta Sat on Board of Company that Bagged $35 Million from Putin-Connected Russian Govt Fund[/h]
Justin Sullivan, Drew Angerer / Getty Images
by STEPHEN K. BANNON & PETER SCHWEIZER1 Aug 201696
[h=2]Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the board of a small energy company alongside Russian officials that received $35 million from a Putin-connected Russian government fund, a relationship Podesta failed to fully disclose on his federal financial disclosures as required by law.[/h]That’s one of the many revelations from a 56-page report released late Sunday titled “From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset, and Cronyism” by the non-partisan government watchdog group, the Government Accountability Institute (GAI). Breitbart Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon holds the same title in GAI and Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer serves as GAI’s president.
Both the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal ran stories on the newly released report late Sunday evening.
[FONT=Arial !important]VIDEO: PODESTA: DNC HACK APPEARS TO COME FROM RUSSIAN UNITS
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)]
As part of her duties during the so-called Russian reset, then-Sec. of State Hillary Clinton led the way on U.S. involvement in a Russian government technology initiative that was intended to be the Russian equivalent of America’s Silicon Valley known as Skolkovo. The “innovation city,” located outside Moscow, has some 30,000 workers in state-of-the-art facilities under strict government control. As Slate described it in 2013, “In some ways, Skolkovo is eerily reminiscent of Soviet utopian city-building projects.”
According to the GAI report, Clinton’s State Dept. recruited U.S. tech giants like Google, Cisco, Intel. Indeed, out of 28 U.S., European, and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors or paid for speeches by Bill Clinton.
However, as involvement in Skolkovo by Clinton cronies increased, so, too, did the danger for the technology coming out of the Russian tech mecca to be used for Russian military purposes.
In 2014, the FBI issued what it called “an extraordinary warning” to several technology companies involved with Skolkovo. “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application,” warned Lucia Ziobro, the assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office. She added: “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by the government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”
Still, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the executive board of a small energy company called Joule Unlimited. Joule, too, received the FBI letter warning about Skolkovo. Other Joule board members included senior Russian officials. According to the GAI report: “Two months after Podesta joined the board, Vladimir Putin’s Rusnano announced that it would invest up to one billion rubles into Joule Unlimited, which amounts to $35 million. That represents one-fifth of the entire amount of investment dollars Joule collected from 2007 to 2013.”
Rusnano, which former Russian education and science minister and current science advisor to Vladmir Putin Andrei Fursenko describes as “Putin’s child,” was founded by Putin in 2007.
The GAI investigative report says it’s unclear how much, if any, money Podesta made. The reason: Podesta was on the board of three Joule entities, but only listed two on his disclosure; the most important entity, Joule Stichting, he did not list. “Podesta’s compensation by Joule cannot be fully determined,” reads the report. “In his 2014 federal government disclosure filing, Podesta lists that he divested stock options from Joule. However, the disclosure does not cover the years 2011-2012.”
Why Podesta failed to reveal, as required by law on his federal financial disclosures, his membership on the board of this offshore company is presently unknown.
“But the flows of funds from Russia during the ‘reset’ to Podesta-connected entities apparently didn’t end with Joule Energy,” the report states. According to the GAI report, Podesta’s far-left think tank, Center for American Progress (CAP), took in $5.25 million from the Sea Change Foundation between 2010-2013.
[/FONT][/COLOR]
493
0
by STEPHEN K. BANNON & PETER SCHWEIZER1 Aug 201696
[h=2]SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER[/h]
[h=2]Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the board of a small energy company alongside Russian officials that received $35 million from a Putin-connected Russian government fund, a relationship Podesta failed to fully disclose on his federal financial disclosures as required by law.[/h]That’s one of the many revelations from a 56-page report released late Sunday titled “From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset, and Cronyism” by the non-partisan government watchdog group, the Government Accountability Institute (GAI). Breitbart Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon holds the same title in GAI and Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer serves as GAI’s president.
Both the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal ran stories on the newly released report late Sunday evening.
[FONT=Arial !important]VIDEO: PODESTA: DNC HACK APPEARS TO COME FROM RUSSIAN UNITS
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)]
As part of her duties during the so-called Russian reset, then-Sec. of State Hillary Clinton led the way on U.S. involvement in a Russian government technology initiative that was intended to be the Russian equivalent of America’s Silicon Valley known as Skolkovo. The “innovation city,” located outside Moscow, has some 30,000 workers in state-of-the-art facilities under strict government control. As Slate described it in 2013, “In some ways, Skolkovo is eerily reminiscent of Soviet utopian city-building projects.”
According to the GAI report, Clinton’s State Dept. recruited U.S. tech giants like Google, Cisco, Intel. Indeed, out of 28 U.S., European, and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors or paid for speeches by Bill Clinton.
However, as involvement in Skolkovo by Clinton cronies increased, so, too, did the danger for the technology coming out of the Russian tech mecca to be used for Russian military purposes.
In 2014, the FBI issued what it called “an extraordinary warning” to several technology companies involved with Skolkovo. “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application,” warned Lucia Ziobro, the assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office. She added: “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by the government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”
Still, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the executive board of a small energy company called Joule Unlimited. Joule, too, received the FBI letter warning about Skolkovo. Other Joule board members included senior Russian officials. According to the GAI report: “Two months after Podesta joined the board, Vladimir Putin’s Rusnano announced that it would invest up to one billion rubles into Joule Unlimited, which amounts to $35 million. That represents one-fifth of the entire amount of investment dollars Joule collected from 2007 to 2013.”
Rusnano, which former Russian education and science minister and current science advisor to Vladmir Putin Andrei Fursenko describes as “Putin’s child,” was founded by Putin in 2007.
The GAI investigative report says it’s unclear how much, if any, money Podesta made. The reason: Podesta was on the board of three Joule entities, but only listed two on his disclosure; the most important entity, Joule Stichting, he did not list. “Podesta’s compensation by Joule cannot be fully determined,” reads the report. “In his 2014 federal government disclosure filing, Podesta lists that he divested stock options from Joule. However, the disclosure does not cover the years 2011-2012.”
Why Podesta failed to reveal, as required by law on his federal financial disclosures, his membership on the board of this offshore company is presently unknown.
“But the flows of funds from Russia during the ‘reset’ to Podesta-connected entities apparently didn’t end with Joule Energy,” the report states. According to the GAI report, Podesta’s far-left think tank, Center for American Progress (CAP), took in $5.25 million from the Sea Change Foundation between 2010-2013.
Who was funding Sea Change Foundation? According to tax records, Sea Change Foundation at the time was receiving a large infusion of funds from a mysterious Bermuda-based entity called ‘Klein, Ltd.’…Who owns Klein? It is impossible to say exactly, given corporate secrecy laws in Bermuda. But the registered agent and lawyers who set up the offshore entity are tied to a handful of Russian business entities including Troika Dialog, Ltd. Leadership includes Ruben Vardanyan, an ethnic Armenian who is a mega oligarch in Putin’s Russia. Vardanyan also served on the board of Joule Energy with John Podesta.
The FBI and U.S. Army sounded the alarm bells about Skolkovo being a threatening pathway for Russia to accelerate its military technological capabilities. Why Hillary Clinton’s State Dept and her campaign manager were tied up in this raises serious questions that demand answers and transparency.
[/FONT][/COLOR]
[h=1]Hillary Called Benghazi Mom a Liar, But Media Freak Out over Trump on Muslim Parents[/h]
Alex Wong / Getty
by JOEL B. POLLAK30 Jul 20165,936
[h=2]Donald Trump is embroiled in another media controversy, this time over his reaction when asked about the emotional speech at the Democratic National Convention by the bereaved parents of Capt. Humayun Khan, an immigrant soldier who died in Iraq in 2004.[/h]As noted here at Breitbart News, the speech was a powerful rebuke, though factually incorrect: the Constitution does not bar religious tests for immigrants, for example.
Now the media has dutifully weaponized the speech to attack him.
[FONT=Arial !important]VIDEO: 1 BIG LESSON EVERY PARENT CAN LEARN FROM A 5-YEAR-OLD WHO SAVED HER MOM'S LIFE
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)]
In an interview with Maureen Down of the New York Times, and again with former Clinton adviser George Stephanopoulos of ABC News, Trump was asked to respond to the speech, which Khan’s father gave while his mother stood silently. He told Dowd, “I’d like to hear his wife say something,” referring to the subordinate status of women in Islam.
Trump said the same to Stephanopoulos, adding that Khan’s father, Khizr Khan, “looked like a nice guy to me,” and defending his own “sacrifices”* for America. He suggested that the Clinton campaign had scripted Khan’s remarks — a charge the family later denied on MSNBC — and returned to his basic policy argument: “We’ve had a lot of problems with radical Islamic terrorism, that’s what I’d say.”
In response, the usual freakout. Ezra Klein of Vox.com, for example, wrote an articleheadlined: “Donald Trump’s slander of Captain Humayun Khan’s family is horrifying, even for Trump.”
But when bereaved Benghazi mother Patricia Smith spoke at the Republican convention the week before, one Vox.com writer called it an example of “a longstanding Republican tendency of extreme overreach.” Another said it was a “scary” appeal to the GOP base, “a new crossing of a line and an ugly degradation of a norm in American politics.” Anotherrushed to reassure Vox.com readers that “no official inquest into Benghazi — and there have been many — has found evidence that Clinton is personally responsible for the events of that night.” Another cited Smith’s speech, and the audience’s reaction (“lock her up!”), “really disturbing.” And another argued that “spotlighting Smith felt a bit exploitive — and, at the same time, irrelevant.”
Talk about “horrifying.”
Other media outlets reacted the same way: PolitiFact rushed to “fact-check” Smith’s claims, though her story has been corroborated by other bereaved Benghazi parents.
Could Trump have been more gracious? Of course. But Clinton — whose negligence contributed to Sean Smith’s death — essentially called Patricia Smith a liar on national TV, and few in the media objected. Some, in fact, joined Clinton’s attack.
The double standard is glaring, and tiresome.
* Stephanopoulos asked Trump what sacrifices he had made for the country, following up on Khan’s rebuke to Trump (“You have sacrificed nothing, and no one”). Bill Clinton notoriously avoided the Vietnam draft — a subject that came up in his 1992 presidential campaign, as Stephanopoulos surely remembers.
Update: Making the circuit of the Sunday morning shows, Khan’s father said terror has “nothing to do with Islam.”
Meanwhile, Trump has issued the following statements, via Twitter and his campaignwebsite:
Follow
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our "leaders" to eradicate it!
7:57 AM - 31 Jul 2016 · New Jersey, USA, United States
“Captain Humayun Khan was a hero to our country and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe. The real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him, and the efforts of these radicals to enter our country to do us further harm. Given the state of the world today, we have to know everything about those looking to enter our country, and given the state of chaos in some of these countries, that is impossible. While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things. If I become President, I will make America safe again.
“Further, Hillary Clinton should be held accountable for her central role in destabilizing the Middle East. She voted to send the United States to war against Iraq, helped lead the disastrous withdrawal of American troops years later that created the vacuum allowing the rise of ISIS, and has never met a regime change she didn’t like (which have all been disasters) – not to mention her invasion of Libya and her abandonment of American personnel in Benghazi. The loss of these lives in Libya is directly traceable to Clinton, but their families’ testimonials were rejected by the media.
Clinton’s actions have been reckless and have directly led to the loss of American lives. And her extreme immigration policies, as also laid out by American victims in Cleveland, will cause the preventable deaths of countless more — while putting all residents, from all places, at greater risk of terrorism.
As Bernie Sanders said on numerous occasions, Hillary Clinton suffers from “bad judgement.” She is not qualified to serve as Commander in Chief.”
[/FONT][/COLOR]
23512
33
by JOEL B. POLLAK30 Jul 20165,936
[h=2]SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER[/h]
[h=2]Donald Trump is embroiled in another media controversy, this time over his reaction when asked about the emotional speech at the Democratic National Convention by the bereaved parents of Capt. Humayun Khan, an immigrant soldier who died in Iraq in 2004.[/h]As noted here at Breitbart News, the speech was a powerful rebuke, though factually incorrect: the Constitution does not bar religious tests for immigrants, for example.
Now the media has dutifully weaponized the speech to attack him.
[FONT=Arial !important]VIDEO: 1 BIG LESSON EVERY PARENT CAN LEARN FROM A 5-YEAR-OLD WHO SAVED HER MOM'S LIFE
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)]
In an interview with Maureen Down of the New York Times, and again with former Clinton adviser George Stephanopoulos of ABC News, Trump was asked to respond to the speech, which Khan’s father gave while his mother stood silently. He told Dowd, “I’d like to hear his wife say something,” referring to the subordinate status of women in Islam.
Trump said the same to Stephanopoulos, adding that Khan’s father, Khizr Khan, “looked like a nice guy to me,” and defending his own “sacrifices”* for America. He suggested that the Clinton campaign had scripted Khan’s remarks — a charge the family later denied on MSNBC — and returned to his basic policy argument: “We’ve had a lot of problems with radical Islamic terrorism, that’s what I’d say.”
In response, the usual freakout. Ezra Klein of Vox.com, for example, wrote an articleheadlined: “Donald Trump’s slander of Captain Humayun Khan’s family is horrifying, even for Trump.”
But when bereaved Benghazi mother Patricia Smith spoke at the Republican convention the week before, one Vox.com writer called it an example of “a longstanding Republican tendency of extreme overreach.” Another said it was a “scary” appeal to the GOP base, “a new crossing of a line and an ugly degradation of a norm in American politics.” Anotherrushed to reassure Vox.com readers that “no official inquest into Benghazi — and there have been many — has found evidence that Clinton is personally responsible for the events of that night.” Another cited Smith’s speech, and the audience’s reaction (“lock her up!”), “really disturbing.” And another argued that “spotlighting Smith felt a bit exploitive — and, at the same time, irrelevant.”
Talk about “horrifying.”
Other media outlets reacted the same way: PolitiFact rushed to “fact-check” Smith’s claims, though her story has been corroborated by other bereaved Benghazi parents.
Could Trump have been more gracious? Of course. But Clinton — whose negligence contributed to Sean Smith’s death — essentially called Patricia Smith a liar on national TV, and few in the media objected. Some, in fact, joined Clinton’s attack.
The double standard is glaring, and tiresome.
* Stephanopoulos asked Trump what sacrifices he had made for the country, following up on Khan’s rebuke to Trump (“You have sacrificed nothing, and no one”). Bill Clinton notoriously avoided the Vietnam draft — a subject that came up in his 1992 presidential campaign, as Stephanopoulos surely remembers.
Update: Making the circuit of the Sunday morning shows, Khan’s father said terror has “nothing to do with Islam.”
Meanwhile, Trump has issued the following statements, via Twitter and his campaignwebsite:
Follow
Donald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump
Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our "leaders" to eradicate it!
7:57 AM - 31 Jul 2016 · New Jersey, USA, United States
“Captain Humayun Khan was a hero to our country and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe. The real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him, and the efforts of these radicals to enter our country to do us further harm. Given the state of the world today, we have to know everything about those looking to enter our country, and given the state of chaos in some of these countries, that is impossible. While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things. If I become President, I will make America safe again.
“Further, Hillary Clinton should be held accountable for her central role in destabilizing the Middle East. She voted to send the United States to war against Iraq, helped lead the disastrous withdrawal of American troops years later that created the vacuum allowing the rise of ISIS, and has never met a regime change she didn’t like (which have all been disasters) – not to mention her invasion of Libya and her abandonment of American personnel in Benghazi. The loss of these lives in Libya is directly traceable to Clinton, but their families’ testimonials were rejected by the media.
Clinton’s actions have been reckless and have directly led to the loss of American lives. And her extreme immigration policies, as also laid out by American victims in Cleveland, will cause the preventable deaths of countless more — while putting all residents, from all places, at greater risk of terrorism.
As Bernie Sanders said on numerous occasions, Hillary Clinton suffers from “bad judgement.” She is not qualified to serve as Commander in Chief.”
[/FONT][/COLOR]
