I am sure most of you know this already, but anyways for those who don't, the question is how can sbd call anyone delusional when it is
HE and not us who have made all of these failed predictions and conspiracy theories over the last 12 months.
In our dictionary at least, the definition or at least implication is that one has to say something which is not true to be called delusional.
Imo simply correcting all of sbd's 99.9% failed predictions with DOCUMENTED, verifiable and empirical evidence contrary to what he has predicted hardly
constitutes delusion on our part.
"Perhaps" just perhaps the word "delusional" applies to him instead!!
HE and not us who have made all of these failed predictions and conspiracy theories over the last 12 months.
In our dictionary at least, the definition or at least implication is that one has to say something which is not true to be called delusional.
Imo simply correcting all of sbd's 99.9% failed predictions with DOCUMENTED, verifiable and empirical evidence contrary to what he has predicted hardly
constitutes delusion on our part.
"Perhaps" just perhaps the word "delusional" applies to him instead!!