If a casual but intelligent and objective observer went over the sbd's thread for the first time, started reading it and somehow was able to read the
most important and standout things which defined sbd and the purpose of the thread, this is what in essence this person would conclude this:
He would start by saying -"beginning last March sbd predicted that Trump would win "in the biggest landslide in history," carry
ALL 50 states and win 90% plus of the popular vote.
"When this didn't happen, after the Election he claimed voter fraud and predicted that on at least 6-8 SPECIFIC dates including Inauguration Day on Jan. 20
and then March 4 Trump would be reinstated by the military.
"When neither of those happened using empirical evidence, sbd claimed several conflicting, inconsistent and contradictory things had occurred depending
on the narrative of that particular day:
"1) Trump is and has always been the POTUS and has been calling the shots right along.
2) Biden or his evil spirit(as Biden is in reality dead) may appear to be the POTUS but "soon" or "very soon" that will
all be overturned and Trump will be officially revealed and declared to be the POTUS when the "time is right."
Meanwhile for reasons unknown Biden has been permitted to enact legislation which affects everyone with no interference
from Trump who is calling theshots or maybe isn't calling the shots just yet depending on what the story is for that day.
3) "Most importantly here we are four and a half months after the Election and sbd is acting like the Election was yesterday and the results will be
overturned "soon,"(no more specific dates used as sbd finally figured out that using them is not to his advantage because
all of his predictions have failed).
4) "Not only has every one of his Election driven predictions failed to come to pass but so are all of the innumerable ones not directly related
to the Elections such as arrests, convictions, punishments such as executions, life sentences to GITMO for alleged offenses against noted
democrats for pedophilia and child trafficking rings as well as of course for "treason" against the United States."
5) Assuming our objective observer wasn't born yesterday, he would conclude by stating and most importantly that "if change and some kind of
justice for alleged wrongdoing was going to occur, it would have occurred LONG before now and probably within days after the Election results
were made official.
"In essence Sbd has done nothing but use stalling tactics and rationalizations starting on the day after the Elections
to try to string people along and try to convince them that eventually he will turn out to be right.
He has made accommodating statements to achieve these ends, which as stated above, conflict with one another,
are totally inconsistent, in many cases contradict other statements and in general add up to a 100% muddled mess.
Our observer would conclude that either sbd is/was very inept overall in concocting this nonsense or vastly underestimated the intelligence of
the people reading it."