lol. You have no idea how dumb you are making yourself look.
You are saying you can't argue with math. I'm not arguing any of your math. But you are mixing math with other things that are simply not true.
i will give you an exact example of what I'm talking about.
I'm going to use perfect math in this example just to show you that what you are saying can be mathematically correct but still be wrong.
There is a 7 eleven 4 miles from my house.
That means I can get there by foot in 12 minutes if I can run a mile in 3 minutes.
Everything I just said is 100% true and backed by indisputable math.
Only problem with the above statement is its 100% impossible for a human to travel a mile by foot in 3 minutes.
And that's the same mistake you are making. It is absolutely 100% impossible for any human to pick 65% winners over a significant number of games.
It has never happened in the history of Earth.
I don't think anyone had picked over 58.5% winners over 5000 plays ever.
So who gives a flying fuck if A is better for someone who picks 70% winners when there is no such thing as someone who picks 70% winners?
Are you really this retarded or is this just a role you are playing on the Internet?
i will give you an exact example of what I'm talking about.
I'm going to use perfect math in this example just to show you that what you are saying can be mathematically correct but still be wrong.
There is a 7 eleven 4 miles from my house.
That means I can get there by foot in 12 minutes if I can run a mile in 3 minutes.
Everything I just said is 100% true and backed by indisputable math.
Only problem with the above statement is its 100% impossible for a human to travel a mile by foot in 3 minutes.
And that's the same mistake you are making. It is absolutely 100% impossible for any human to pick 65% winners over a significant number of games.
It has never happened in the history of Earth.
I don't think anyone had picked over 58.5% winners over 5000 plays ever.
So who gives a flying fuck if A is better for someone who picks 70% winners when there is no such thing as someone who picks 70% winners?
Are you really this retarded or is this just a role you are playing on the Internet?
Actually, I'm "mixing" nothing.
See, the question didn't exactly presume that you would have to use the book forever, use it for 5,000 wagers, or the like.
You just assumed that, and frankly you can't even understand my responses. Mainly because you're in a puffy rush to pretend you're knowledgable or informed.
I know why that is.
Are all Saints fans as insecure as you?
How about this: those of you who think A is the right choice.
Do you want an account to bet into and you where you lay -115 either side (or 30 cents wide) and you get to add 20% to all your withdrawals? Wouldn't that be the same thing? Or What I mean is if you choose A over B then shouldn't you choose this option over both A and B?
Perhaps this will wake you up.
Do you want an account to bet into and you where you lay -115 either side (or 30 cents wide) and you get to add 20% to all your withdrawals? Wouldn't that be the same thing? Or What I mean is if you choose A over B then shouldn't you choose this option over both A and B?
Perhaps this will wake you up.
