Which would you choose....

[Illini]

Anyone disagreeing with Choptalk is an idiot, just like he said they were.

 

[Acebb]

Dude, you have to be the most clueless person I've ever seen on this forum. You make HeatOhio seem smart.

Right.


which part of your idiotic drivel proved the math wrong again?

 

[Acebb]

Anyone disagreeing with Choptalk is an idiot, just like he said they were.

Anyone agreeing with choptalk who does not bother themselves with basic mathematical calculations based on high or low winning % is really, really stupid.

Poster illini, did not bother with basic math.

 

[Illini]

Anyone agreeing with choptalk who does not bother themselves with basic mathematical calculations based on high or low winning % is really, really stupid.

Poster illini, did not bother with basic math.

It's crazy to argue with idiots. But let's just assume you are the best handicapper on the planet and can hit 60%.
60 wins +6000
40 losses -4000
2k-200=1800 profit

60 wins +6000
40 losses -4400
1600 profit.

Nobody hits above 60%. Argument over. Close thread.

 

[Acebb]

It's crazy to argue with idiots. But let's just assume you are the best handicapper on the planet and can hit 60%

:nohead:

One of the most idiotic things I've ever read on the Internet.
It is comical to watch these loud mouthed people beclown themselves on this topic.

 

[Acebb]

Nobody hits above 60%

====
There will be people posting in the CFB forum who hit over 60% in bowl season.

You should probably stop now.

 

[doubledeuce22]

C. Offer -110 then charge YOU 10% to withdraw YOUR winnings.

Not one person would pick C.

What this thread should illustrate is how terrible it is to play offshore nowadays.

 

[Illini]

Lol. Like I said, you can't win arguing with idiots.

 

[Acebb]

Lol. Like I said, you can't win arguing with idiots.

It is hilarious to watch you pretend calling names is responsive.

Then again, you don't really have a clue as to what I've even said here.

Carry on.

 

[CHOPTALK]

Math doesn't lie.

Math doesn't support little chippy chop.

Why you keep saying otherwise isn't clear

You ou must enjoy making yourself look like an idiot.

 

[CHOPTALK]

Anyone agreeing with choptalk who does not bother themselves with basic mathematical calculations based on high or low winning % is really, really stupid.

Poster illini, did not bother with basic math.

You are basing your numbers on someone winning 70% of there bets. Do you realize this does not exist in the history of earth?
Your calculations only apply to hypothetical situations.

Even 60% long term is impossible.

 

[CHOPTALK]

Nobody hits above 60%

====
There will be people posting in the CFB forum who hit over 60% in bowl season.

You should probably stop now.

You are beyond hope man.

 

[slapshot]

Since a lot of players can't win they would take B so they can lose one more time

 

[Acebb]

You ou must enjoy making yourself look like an idiot.

Except I'm not the one making silly, breathless declarative statements.

You are.

Of course you're not bright enough to understand what that means.

 

[Acebb]

You are beyond hope man.

Actually, I'm using math to show that you should probably stop screeching here.

Nothing you've ever posted would indicate you have 1 utter clue as to the proper answer to this question.

 

[Acebb]

You are basing your numbers on someone winning 70% of there bets. Do you realize this does not exist in the history of earth?
Your calculations only apply to hypothetical situations.

Even 60% long term is impossible.

Note the silly declaritives.

20+ years in the business world has shown me the value of idiocy like this.

Now run along chippy chop, someone, somewhere mocked Drew Brees!

 

[CHOPTALK]

Actually, I'm using math to show that you should probably stop screeching here.

Nothing you've ever posted would indicate you have 1 utter clue as to the proper answer to this question.

what you don't realize is nobody in the history of earth has ever hit 60% over a significant number of plays.
If you think someone ever has you are just showing everyone how clueless you really are.

 

[CHOPTALK]

Actually, I'm using math to show that you should probably stop screeching here.

Nothing you've ever posted would indicate you have 1 utter clue as to the proper answer to this question.

you are basing all your calculations on hypotheticals.

Who cares if a is better if you hit 65%.
65% winners don't exist.

 

[PatsFan1283]

This thread makes me wish I was a bookie. People don't even know what would be best for them from a gambling perspective.

The answer is clearly B and yes it would be be if it was 35%, it would be B if it was 50%

gee I wonder why a book like this doesn't exist

 

[Illini]

I think Acebb is HeatOhio. Has to be.