More interesting reading. Asked and answered.
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=566427&highlight=pentagon&page=21
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=566427&highlight=pentagon&page=21
- Status
geez, you guys are ignorant. you've never seen the view from the street? im sure that EVERYONE in NY is in on it, and the gov't paid bin laden to claim responsibity
let it go doc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPvi8sOGN5U
Newton's Third Law of Motion:
<CENTER><TABLE cellPadding=15 width=450 bgColor=#ffffe0 border=7><TBODY><TR><TD>[FONT=helvetica,geneva,arial]III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [/FONT]</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>The building hit the plane at a speed of 500 mph.
If what your eyes told you you were seeing were correct. It defies Newton's law. The laws of physics, like mathematics, are absolute and cannot be defied.
If what you saw on TV really happened then planes wouldn't worry about losing power over the ocean. Crashing into the ocean would be be no problem as the water would offer no resistance and the plane could slice through it. Like butter, undamaged. Unfortunately, pilots know this is a fallacy. The plane drops from the sky and when it hits the ocean a plane will break apart. It's like hitting a brick wall.
Money Talks -- if these idiots don't understand physics by now, they never will.
If the building was made of water it still would have smashed into it and broken into pieces.
There were no planes. Only explosions.
<CENTER><TABLE cellPadding=15 width=450 bgColor=#ffffe0 border=7><TBODY><TR><TD>[FONT=helvetica,geneva,arial]III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [/FONT]</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>The building hit the plane at a speed of 500 mph.
If what your eyes told you you were seeing were correct. It defies Newton's law. The laws of physics, like mathematics, are absolute and cannot be defied.
If what you saw on TV really happened then planes wouldn't worry about losing power over the ocean. Crashing into the ocean would be be no problem as the water would offer no resistance and the plane could slice through it. Like butter, undamaged. Unfortunately, pilots know this is a fallacy. The plane drops from the sky and when it hits the ocean a plane will break apart. It's like hitting a brick wall.
Money Talks -- if these idiots don't understand physics by now, they never will.
If the building was made of water it still would have smashed into it and broken into pieces.
There were no planes. Only explosions.
hno:We are supposed to believe some random pictures are of that "crash" site? Oh, I know, because it has a government sticker/tag that says "government exhibit" makes it official? That alone would make me doubt the validity of the pictures...
There was no plane,” Ernie Stull, mayor of Shanksville, told German television in March 2003: "My sister and a good friend of mine were the first ones there,” Stull said. “They were standing on a street corner in Shanksville talking. Their car was nearby, so they were the first here—and the fire department came. Everyone was puzzled, because the call had been that a plane had crashed. But there was no plane.”
As reported in the The Tribune Democrat
Miller was among the very first to arrive after 10:06 on the magnificently sunny morning of September 11. He was stunned at how small the smoking crater [of UA93 crash site] looked, he says, "like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped all this trash into it." Once he was able to absorb the scene, Miller says, "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there.
By Peter Perl, Washington Post
“The gouge was 8 to 10 feet deep and 15 to 20 feet long, said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police. “
(AP, 9/12/01 )
There was no plane,” Ernie Stull, mayor of Shanksville, told German television in March 2003: "My sister and a good friend of mine were the first ones there,” Stull said. “They were standing on a street corner in Shanksville talking. Their car was nearby, so they were the first here—and the fire department came. Everyone was puzzled, because the call had been that a plane had crashed. But there was no plane.”
As reported in the The Tribune Democrat
Miller was among the very first to arrive after 10:06 on the magnificently sunny morning of September 11. He was stunned at how small the smoking crater [of UA93 crash site] looked, he says, "like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped all this trash into it." Once he was able to absorb the scene, Miller says, "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there.
By Peter Perl, Washington Post
“The gouge was 8 to 10 feet deep and 15 to 20 feet long, said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police. “
(AP, 9/12/01 )
Use this link and scroll down to debris photos. You will see the actual evidence used in the trial of the so called "20th hijacker". If the rules of evidence are good enough for our federal courts then I can except its validity.
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...v=/images?q=flight+93+debris&gbv=2&hl=en&sa=G
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...v=/images?q=flight+93+debris&gbv=2&hl=en&sa=G
Crashing into the ocean would be be no problem as the water would offer no resistance and the plane could slice through it.
Holy cow
Pure & Utter Shock Value when you're making silly ass posts like this one
But hey, it's more traffic for our commercial sports capping web site
Rock on
Holy cow
Pure & Utter Shock Value when you're making silly ass posts like this one
But hey, it's more traffic for our commercial sports capping web site
Rock on
- Status
