are you sure Crude is Woodstool? Doesn't seem it to me
Woodstool was calling me a stiff on the night of the election even before the polls were closed because he wanted me to pay based on a projection. Even started a thread calling me a stiff, and I paid him on Wednesday (in less than 24 hours). So I didn't like that much
I’m just going to say this Willie...are you sure Crude is Woodstool? Doesn't seem it to me
Woodstool was calling me a stiff on the night of the election even before the polls were closed because he wanted me to pay based on a projection. Even started a thread calling me a stiff, and I paid him on Wednesday (in less than 24 hours). So I didn't like that much
I believe in second chances and if a man puts his money up first and throws his nuts on the table like Crude did either way I gotta give the man props...
Only point I was trying to make is people seem to act surprised when some stranger stiffs them on a internet bet...
But he did take his stand put his money where his mouth is and that is worth something in my book...
Willie,
You are holding the money. I showed you what i offered Michanegelo and what he accepted. He has offered evidence of a broad bet that i offered another poster. Of which had Tater accepted we would have then discussed specifics before money was sent. Michanegleo accepted, specifics were discussed, he accepted and money was sent.
But you are obviously holding the funds.
You are holding the money. I showed you what i offered Michanegelo and what he accepted. He has offered evidence of a broad bet that i offered another poster. Of which had Tater accepted we would have then discussed specifics before money was sent. Michanegleo accepted, specifics were discussed, he accepted and money was sent.
But you are obviously holding the funds.
I got an opinion on this but it isn't gonna yield a solution.
Mich is actually right, Crude did NOT define the terms of the bet correctly. The spirit of the bet and what it was should be is absolutely obvious to anyone, but he just didn't. You know who defined the terms of the bet correctly? Me when I offered people the same bet on page 3 and said at 11:50pm on Nov 2nd. I.e the night before the election.
However, obviously if Trump were to get over +105 at 5-1, why would Woodstool do that? he could just bet Biden to win outright laying less than 2-1. That makes absolutely no sense.
So Crude didn't cross his t's and dot his i's to make sure Mich understood the wager. However, I have no clue what Mich was thinking that he would get 5-1 at any time intra-day (who would do that? That's absurd)
I think Mich should pay but if he didn't want to I can't fault him for it. If you're gonna bet people on an anonymous forum about stuff like this, you gotta do a better job defining the parameters even if common sense clearly dictates what the bet should've been.
(I believe this is correct but I didn't read every single post so could be wrong)
Mich is actually right, Crude did NOT define the terms of the bet correctly. The spirit of the bet and what it was should be is absolutely obvious to anyone, but he just didn't. You know who defined the terms of the bet correctly? Me when I offered people the same bet on page 3 and said at 11:50pm on Nov 2nd. I.e the night before the election.
However, obviously if Trump were to get over +105 at 5-1, why would Woodstool do that? he could just bet Biden to win outright laying less than 2-1. That makes absolutely no sense.
So Crude didn't cross his t's and dot his i's to make sure Mich understood the wager. However, I have no clue what Mich was thinking that he would get 5-1 at any time intra-day (who would do that? That's absurd)
I think Mich should pay but if he didn't want to I can't fault him for it. If you're gonna bet people on an anonymous forum about stuff like this, you gotta do a better job defining the parameters even if common sense clearly dictates what the bet should've been.
(I believe this is correct but I didn't read every single post so could be wrong)
Absolutely positive crude is woodstool...are you sure Crude is Woodstool? Doesn't seem it to me
Woodstool was calling me a stiff on the night of the election even before the polls were closed because he wanted me to pay based on a projection. Even started a thread calling me a stiff, and I paid him on Wednesday (in less than 24 hours). So I didn't like that much
Random internet bets with strangers...drama about the outcome and payment...”new members”(obvious ghost)coming to his defense...not even a question willie.
It is clear as glass...
He knows I 100% know...but that is neither here nor there...
He posted up his money and that had to be respected...
But gezzz now we have to go days upon days of his drama arguing about winning or losing a bet...
In the court of law mich is right but in a sports bar setting I think everyone should know the intent of the bet .
If Mich wants to be an ass about it I guess he could be but he don’t strike me as that type .
I think anyone with any sense knows what the intentions of this bet was regardless of the fact that both sides did a very poor job making it clear
The bet was not as clear as it should have been .
The worldwide pandemic and Floyd's death that democrats and their criminal corrupt colluding always lying media blamed on Trump and really stupid people swallowed whole without reflux changed that
Throw in ballot harvesting which democrats enabled and blamed it on... wait for it... the pandemic and baddafuckingbing, a senile old man with really stupid ideas looks like he's going to squeak out a close election
PS: I'm not calling you any of those names, although there are at least 10 posters around here that fit all those descriptions to a T
