[h=1]Kasich signs bill to defund Planned Parenthood[/h]
^ thanks for confirming that is completely the "sane" and mainstream position.
^ thanks for confirming that is completely the "sane" and mainstream position.
Here's the deal, if republicans want to win, Never mention same sex marriage again, don't even bring up the gay issue, the less you talk about delicate issues the better off you are going to be. While they are at it, drop the planned Parenthood shit too. They can keep appealing to the base but they need to attract non based voters to win. Im not saying they have to come out and support gay marriage or support planned parenthood, just don't bring up the subject, you already have those people's vote. I have an idea, instead of talking about social issues, repealing ACA etc why don't they spend time creating a new health care reform and present that to the public? Don't you think they could get more voters by presenting well thought out plans rather than making blanket statements?
Kasich is on top of things?
Report: Kasich failed to gather enough signatures to appear on Pennsylvania ballot
Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s own lawyer agrees the presidential campaign submitted fewer valid signatures than are required for the candidate to appear on Pennsylvania’s primary ballot. But he argued in court Wednesday that it doesn’t matter because an objection to Mr. Kasich’s nominating petitions was filed 13 minutes too late.
At issue is whether challenges to Pennsylvania nominating petitions are due by 5 p.m. or 11:59 p.m. on the last day to file.
Attorneys for Mr. Kasich and the objector have stipulated that the campaign filed no more than 2,184 signatures with the state, and that 192 of those signatures were not valid. Republican and Democratic candidates for president must submit 2,000 signatures to appear on the ballot.
Best REPUBLICAN chance to get a REPUBLICAN elected POTUS.
He can’t even get on the ballot in Pennsylvania.
Kasich and Rubio can beat Clinton.....the clowns Joe and Dave support can not.
Seriously, how many times must you two be wrong about this shit?
Dave was sent packing for a year because of his solid Romney over Obama prediction and Joe has been wrong about every single political prediction for a decade.
You clowns have no shame at all.
Seriously, how many times must you two be wrong about this shit?
Dave was sent packing for a year because of his solid Romney over Obama prediction and Joe has been wrong about every single political prediction for a decade.
You clowns have no shame at all.
Kasich is on top of things?
Report: Kasich failed to gather enough signatures to appear on Pennsylvania ballot
Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s own lawyer agrees the presidential campaign submitted fewer valid signatures than are required for the candidate to appear on Pennsylvania’s primary ballot. But he argued in court Wednesday that it doesn’t matter because an objection to Mr. Kasich’s nominating petitions was filed 13 minutes too late.
At issue is whether challenges to Pennsylvania nominating petitions are due by 5 p.m. or 11:59 p.m. on the last day to file.
Attorneys for Mr. Kasich and the objector have stipulated that the campaign filed no more than 2,184 signatures with the state, and that 192 of those signatures were not valid. Republican and Democratic candidates for president must submit 2,000 signatures to appear on the ballot.
Best REPUBLICAN chance to get a REPUBLICAN elected POTUS.
He can’t even get on the ballot in Pennsylvania.
Kasich's predictions are almost as good as spammy's!
Kasich just sealed his fate.
His immigration policies will wreck what little chance he had.
In his own words…
“God Bless” Illegal Immigrants.
“I couldn’t imagine” enforcing our current immigration laws: “That is not… the kind of values that we believe in.”
Kasich likened deporting the illegal population to Japanese internment camps.
Illegal immigrants “are some of the hardest-working, God-fearing, family-oriented people you can ever meet.”
Allowing ICE officers to do their jobs is not “humane.”
America can’t deport illegal immigrants because they are “made in the image of the Lord.”
Kasich has called for implementing an open borders-style policy where workers can come and go as they please.
Kasich would enact amnesty within his first 100 days.
America shouldn’t address ending birthright citizenship because it’s “dividing people.”
Illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay because “they’re here.”
http://www.breitbart.com/immigratio...nesty-illegals-made-in-the-image-of-the-lord/
His immigration policies will wreck what little chance he had.
In his own words…
“God Bless” Illegal Immigrants.
“I couldn’t imagine” enforcing our current immigration laws: “That is not… the kind of values that we believe in.”
Kasich likened deporting the illegal population to Japanese internment camps.
Illegal immigrants “are some of the hardest-working, God-fearing, family-oriented people you can ever meet.”
Allowing ICE officers to do their jobs is not “humane.”
America can’t deport illegal immigrants because they are “made in the image of the Lord.”
Kasich has called for implementing an open borders-style policy where workers can come and go as they please.
Kasich would enact amnesty within his first 100 days.
America shouldn’t address ending birthright citizenship because it’s “dividing people.”
Illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay because “they’re here.”
http://www.breitbart.com/immigratio...nesty-illegals-made-in-the-image-of-the-lord/
The latest Mercyhurst Poll tested all eight possible head-to-head matchups for November with PA voters.
Clinton
The former Secretary of State split the results.
She leads businessman Donald Trump 43% to 35% and Texas Senator Ted Cruz 45% to 42%.
Hillary trails, however, against Ohio Governor John Kasich (36/49) and Florida Senator Marco Rubio (39/47).
Clinton
The former Secretary of State split the results.
She leads businessman Donald Trump 43% to 35% and Texas Senator Ted Cruz 45% to 42%.
Hillary trails, however, against Ohio Governor John Kasich (36/49) and Florida Senator Marco Rubio (39/47).
[h=3]Polling Data[/h]
[h=3]Polling Data[/h]
| Poll | Date | Sample | MoE | Clinton (D) | Trump (R) | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCP Average | 2/11 - 3/6 | -- | -- | 47.3 | 41.0 | Clinton +6.3 |
| NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl | 3/3 - 3/6 | 1200 RV | 2.8 | 51 | 38 | Clinton +13 |
| ABC News/Wash Post | 3/3 - 3/6 | 864 RV | 4.0 | 50 | 41 | Clinton +9 |
| Rasmussen Reports | 2/29 - 3/1 | 1000 LV | 3.0 | 41 | 36 | Clinton +5 |
| CNN/ORC | 2/24 - 2/27 | 920 RV | 3.0 | 52 | 44 | Clinton +8 |
| FOX News | 2/15 - 2/17 | 1031 RV | 3.0 | 47 | 42 | Clinton +5 |
| USA Today/Suffolk | 2/11 - 2/15 | 1000 LV | 3.0 | 43 | 45 | Trump +2 |
| Poll | Date | Sample | MoE | Kasich (R) | Clinton (D) | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCP Average | 2/10 - 2/17 | -- | -- | 47.7 | 40.3 | Kasich +7.4 |
| FOX News | 2/15 - 2/17 | 1031 RV | 3.0 | 47 | 44 | Kasich +3 |
| Quinnipiac | 2/10 - 2/15 | 1342 RV | 2.7 | 47 | 39 | Kasich +8 |
| USA Today/Suffolk | 2/11 - 2/15 | 1000 LV | 3.0 | 49 | 38 | Kasich +11 |
Trump has a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton in the general election says college professor who is 'almost certain' the Donald will be the next U.S. president
Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling gives Trump with a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton in the general election. He'd have an even better shot against Bernie Sanders - 99 percent.
'The bottom line is that the primary model, using also the cyclical movement, makes it almost certain that Donald Trump will be the next president,' Norpoth told Stony Brook's school newspaper, The Statesman, 'if he’s a nominee of the [Republican] party.'
The numbers don't lie: Norpoth's model has accurately predicted the winner of every national election since 1912, The Statesman reports, except the election of 1960.
One of the closest elections in U.S. history, John F. Kennedy bested Richard Nixon by 0.17 percent or 112,827 votes.
Norpoth's model is correct 96.1 percent of the time, suggesting victory is on the horizon for Trump
'When I started out with this kind of display a few months ago, I thought it was sort of a joke.' Norpoth said at a gathering Monday at the SUNY Global Center in Manhattan, according to The Stateman.
He added, 'Well, I’ll tell you right now, it ain’t a joke anymore.'
Trump has won three out of four GOP contests this year and is ahead in polling in most states that vote on Tuesday.
Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are trying to catch up, but the GOP senators have had to spend much of their time this year pushing out low-polling candidates with little chance of winning who were siphoning off support from their own bids.
Cruz has won one contest, Iowa, in January, and Rubio has won none. He's come in twice in a row, though, in South Carolina and Nevada.
Overall, Norpoth said a Republican has a 61 percent chance of winning the general election come November.
Clinton would have a 55 percent chance of winning if she went up against Cruz or Rubio and Norpoth's model says she'd have 0.3 percent on either of them in the popular vote category.
They'd beat Sanders, though, he said, by 0.6 percent. That boosts their odds of winning to 60 percent, respectively.
If Trump is the nominee, those odds go up substantially, Norpoth said.
'The probability of that [outcome] is almost complete certainty, 97 percent. It’s almost, "take it to the bank." '
Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling shows that Trump has a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton in the general election
- Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling gives Trump a 97 percent chance of beating Clinton in November - if he's the GOP nominee
- He'd have an even better shot against Bernie Sanders - 99 percent
- Norpoth's model has accurately predicted the winner of every national election since 1912, The Statesman reports, except the election of 1960
- If either Rubio or Cruz were the GOP nominee, the model shows them losing to Clinton but winning against Sanders
Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling gives Trump with a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton in the general election. He'd have an even better shot against Bernie Sanders - 99 percent.
'The bottom line is that the primary model, using also the cyclical movement, makes it almost certain that Donald Trump will be the next president,' Norpoth told Stony Brook's school newspaper, The Statesman, 'if he’s a nominee of the [Republican] party.'
The numbers don't lie: Norpoth's model has accurately predicted the winner of every national election since 1912, The Statesman reports, except the election of 1960.
One of the closest elections in U.S. history, John F. Kennedy bested Richard Nixon by 0.17 percent or 112,827 votes.
Norpoth's model is correct 96.1 percent of the time, suggesting victory is on the horizon for Trump
'When I started out with this kind of display a few months ago, I thought it was sort of a joke.' Norpoth said at a gathering Monday at the SUNY Global Center in Manhattan, according to The Stateman.
He added, 'Well, I’ll tell you right now, it ain’t a joke anymore.'
Trump has won three out of four GOP contests this year and is ahead in polling in most states that vote on Tuesday.
Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are trying to catch up, but the GOP senators have had to spend much of their time this year pushing out low-polling candidates with little chance of winning who were siphoning off support from their own bids.
Cruz has won one contest, Iowa, in January, and Rubio has won none. He's come in twice in a row, though, in South Carolina and Nevada.
Overall, Norpoth said a Republican has a 61 percent chance of winning the general election come November.
Clinton would have a 55 percent chance of winning if she went up against Cruz or Rubio and Norpoth's model says she'd have 0.3 percent on either of them in the popular vote category.
They'd beat Sanders, though, he said, by 0.6 percent. That boosts their odds of winning to 60 percent, respectively.
If Trump is the nominee, those odds go up substantially, Norpoth said.
'The probability of that [outcome] is almost complete certainty, 97 percent. It’s almost, "take it to the bank." '
Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling shows that Trump has a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton in the general election
Trump has a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton in the general election says college professor who is 'almost certain' the Donald will be the next U.S. president
- Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling gives Trump a 97 percent chance of beating Clinton in November - if he's the GOP nominee
- He'd have an even better shot against Bernie Sanders - 99 percent
- Norpoth's model has accurately predicted the winner of every national election since 1912, The Statesman reports, except the election of 1960
If a professor at Stony Brook University is correct, Donald J Trump will be the next President of the United States.
- If either Rubio or Cruz were the GOP nominee, the model shows them losing to Clinton but winning against Sanders
Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling gives Trump with a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton in the general election. He'd have an even better shot against Bernie Sanders - 99 percent.
'The bottom line is that the primary model, using also the cyclical movement, makes it almost certain that Donald Trump will be the next president,' Norpoth told Stony Brook's school newspaper, The Statesman, 'if he’s a nominee of the [Republican] party.'
The numbers don't lie: Norpoth's model has accurately predicted the winner of every national election since 1912, The Statesman reports, except the election of 1960.
One of the closest elections in U.S. history, John F. Kennedy bested Richard Nixon by 0.17 percent or 112,827 votes.
Norpoth's model is correct 96.1 percent of the time, suggesting victory is on the horizon for Trump
'When I started out with this kind of display a few months ago, I thought it was sort of a joke.' Norpoth said at a gathering Monday at the SUNY Global Center in Manhattan, according to The Stateman.
He added, 'Well, I’ll tell you right now, it ain’t a joke anymore.'
Trump has won three out of four GOP contests this year and is ahead in polling in most states that vote on Tuesday.
Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are trying to catch up, but the GOP senators have had to spend much of their time this year pushing out low-polling candidates with little chance of winning who were siphoning off support from their own bids.
Cruz has won one contest, Iowa, in January, and Rubio has won none. He's come in twice in a row, though, in South Carolina and Nevada.
Overall, Norpoth said a Republican has a 61 percent chance of winning the general election come November.
Clinton would have a 55 percent chance of winning if she went up against Cruz or Rubio and Norpoth's model says she'd have 0.3 percent on either of them in the popular vote category.
They'd beat Sanders, though, he said, by 0.6 percent. That boosts their odds of winning to 60 percent, respectively.
If Trump is the nominee, those odds go up substantially, Norpoth said.
'The probability of that [outcome] is almost complete certainty, 97 percent. It’s almost, "take it to the bank." '
Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling shows that Trump has a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton in the general election
| US Presidential Election - Winner | |||||||
| Tue 11/8 | 101 Hillary Clinton wins Election | -250 | |||||
| 8:00AM | 102 Field wins Presidential Election | +210 | |||||
| Tue 11/8 | 103 Donald Trump wins Election | +335 | |||||
| 8:00AM | 104 Field wins Presidential Election | -420 |
