This bowl system went 11-1 last season ...

[Capone1899]

The reason Tulsa went from +2.5 to -2.5 is because the MAC has lost every bowl game so far

 

[SchlepRock]

im in on bs

 

[majestikmoose]

ball state

 

[seventypercent]

not here to settle any battles, just some info

I have all the numbers for sos and rankings for sagrin before bowls and now.... to be honest the changes are so slim that backtracking will only a effect a few plays if any.

example

wakeforest sag rating was 78.70 and sched strength was 76.51
wakeforest sag rating now 78.51 and sched strength now 76.35

navy was 76.49 and sched was 68.50
navy now 76.38 and sched now 68.40

the changes are .1, and everyone's will be changing. so only a few teams will be effected. Its pretty simple, if a team plays a better team their schedule ranking might go up, and vice versa. Interesting enough Ohio st. I believe has gone up ..even with the big ten doing so poorly. double check that one.

 

[jbragg10]

^ not sure ...

Either way ... I know this for sure:
Last year this system was 11-1
This year the system is 12-4

Can't wait until next year

 

[G-Lee]

Looks like Ball St +3 Big for me.. Lets Cash

 

[coitus_maximus]

Anyone know about head coach Stan Parrish? I think he will be the reason Ball State will beat Tulsa. He was so impressed with the Tulsa offense that he spent a year and a half learning their offense and trying to see how it worked. Now he gets to play against it. Crazy huh???

 

[ivan722]

ball st +2.5 is a gift

good luck guys

Interesting words for sure.
Hope you're right with that word 'gift'.
We'll see.

:howdy:

 

[MMfan]

Interesting words for sure.
Hope you're right with that word 'gift'.
We'll see.

:howdy:

Up to +3 now. Is that a bigger gift? %^_

 

[jbragg10]

1. Wake Forest (32, 4 SOS) over Navy (39, 74 SOS) - WINNER
2. South Florida (49, 59 SOS) over Memphis (100, 117 SOS) - WINNER
3. Arizona (41, 78 SOS) over BYU (23, 83 SOS) - WINNER
4. TCU (9, 76 SOS) over Boise State (11, 113 SOS) - LOSER
5. Notre Dame (58, 36 SOS) over Hawaii (82, 72 SOS) - WINNER
6. NC State (47, 3 SOS) over Rutgers (38, 67 SOS) - WINNER
7. Missouri (13, 30 SOS) over Northwestern (37, 64 SOS) - LOSER
8. Maryland (50, 21 SOS) over Nevada (60, 88 SOS) - WINNER
9. Rice (63, 101 SOS) over Western Michigan (57, 109 SOS) - WINNER
10. Air Force (48, 77 SOS) over Houston (65, 102 SOS) - LOSER
11. Kansas (33, 23 SOS) over Minnesota (66, 69 SOS) - WINNER
12. USC (5, 38 SOS) over Penn State (6, 61 SOS) - WINNER
13. Virginia Tech (15, 13 SOS) over Cincinnati (28, 62 SOS) - WINNER
14. Kentucky (67, 73 SOS) over East Carolina (52, 75 SOS) - WINNER
15. Alabama (7, 58 SOS) over Utah (8, 70 SOS) - LOSER
16. Connecticut (42, 40 SOS) over Buffalo (55, 82 SOS) - WINNER
17. Ball State (36, 116 SOS) over Tulsa (56, 122 SOS)


System = 12-4

Last play of the system:
Ball St +3

good luck!

 

[GasMan]

Jbragg...thanks for sharing. Will have to put this system in my notes for next bowl season.

 

[HE]

I smell a classic buy back!!

Started at Ball St. -2.5 now their +3. I may not have gotten smarter over the years, but my gut surly has. I've seen this scenerio so many times before.

I can see this crossing the key # (3) and plummett to Ball St. side in the last few minutes prior to kickoff. I'm going to wait, and if it happens I will nail Ball ST.

We'll see!!

 

[Johnny~Vegas]

This may have been asked before, but have you tried this system in the regular season? Thanks in advance!

 

[Snookslayer]

System = 12-4

Tis no system. :nono5:



It's a supernatural force of nature!
ope:

 

[jbragg10]

^ lol

 

[SixTSix]

Started at Ball St. -2.5 now their +3. I may not have gotten smarter over the years, but my gut surly has. I've seen this scenerio so many times before.

I can see this crossing the key # (3) and plummett to Ball St. side in the last few minutes prior to kickoff. I'm going to wait, and if it happens I will nail Ball ST.

We'll see!!

I have it at:
Ball St +3 -125 Now
Will it drop to +2.5 before kickoff?

 

[GameBoy7o2]

well im hoping the ML will work out for the best =)

 

[ivan722]

ball st +2.5 is a gift
good luck guys

Are you sure you didn't make a mistake and meant to say that Tulsa at -2.5 (-3.5 in some places) was the gift?

Some gift as Tulsa is taking it right to the Ball State team 24-10 as I type. It appears that Ball State really doesn't have a lot of balls afterall.

The actual fucking gift was the betting line moving from one side to another. Now if that wasn't a certain sign pointing to the Tulsa side as the upcoming winner tonight, then all the BS bettors should pack it in for good because you'll never get a better gift and to think you all failed to pick up on it and take the Ball side makes it even more ridiculous.
Un-fucking-real!!!!!

:nohead:

 

[5-0SAT]

Are you sure you didn't make a mistake and meant to say that Tulsa at -2.5 (-3.5 in some places) was the gift?

Some gift as Tulsa is taking it right to the Ball State team 24-10 as I type. It appears that Ball State really doesn't have a lot of balls afterall.

The actual fucking gift was the betting line moving from one side to another. Now if that wasn't a certain sign pointing to the Tulsa side as the upcoming winner tonight, then all the BS bettors should pack it in for good because you'll never get a better gift and to think you all failed to pick up on it and take the Ball side makes it even more ridiculous.
Un-fucking-real!!!!!

:nohead:

Wow, you really know nothing! :nono5:

 

[SchlepRock]

Are you sure you didn't make a mistake and meant to say that Tulsa at -2.5 (-3.5 in some places) was the gift?

Some gift as Tulsa is taking it right to the Ball State team 24-10 as I type. It appears that Ball State really doesn't have a lot of balls afterall.

The actual fucking gift was the betting line moving from one side to another. Now if that wasn't a certain sign pointing to the Tulsa side as the upcoming winner tonight, then all the BS bettors should pack it in for good because you'll never get a better gift and to think you all failed to pick up on it and take the Ball side makes it even more ridiculous.
Un-fucking-real!!!!!

:nohead:

You dont have a clue what your talking about :missingte