you have to understand 1 thing terrosits by definition do not want peace. If peace is achieved then their whole reason for exisitng goes up in flames. Why are we not seeing suiside bombing in Jordan where more Palistinians live in refugee camps than do in Israel where at least they have opportunity to work? becasue a free state is not the purpose of these terrorist goups, causeing fear, death and destruction to anyone one not like them is their only reason for exsisting. You cant be a terrorist if no one is scared of you so it dont matter if Kerry or Bush is president the violence will continue. I pick the guy who PROVED he is willing to sacrifie his own political carrer by proactivly taking on these thugs rather than some guy who threw his medals away after serving becasue it was the politically cool thing to do at the time.
Chuckie,
The day will come for Syria and Iran. Bush is the only one that will do anything about Syria and Iran. If Kerrys elected Edwards will subpoena the terrorist into submission. Wait till the debates and America will see how clueless Kerry and Edwards are. I'm very confident of this. Load up on Bush for the easy winner.
The day will come for Syria and Iran. Bush is the only one that will do anything about Syria and Iran. If Kerrys elected Edwards will subpoena the terrorist into submission. Wait till the debates and America will see how clueless Kerry and Edwards are. I'm very confident of this. Load up on Bush for the easy winner.
Oh I am laughing now. W, the self-admitted "non-linguist" and his f-bomb dropping sidekick are going to outsmart Kerry and Edwards and make them look clueless? PLEASE!!! Bush is going to go up there in debates and repeat about 25 times how we are at war and hope people get scared and vote for him. And maybe 5 times he will repeat how tax cuts are the cure for everything from AIDS to internet fraud. He couldn't beat most high school debate teams in a debate. All he does is repeat the same two topics, War on Tear-uh and permanent tax cuts.
This is the 2nd time GAMEFACE has said Bush will make Kerry look clueless in a debate. I ignored him the first time thinking he had one too many. Now I am convinced he is delusional. Bush is such a clod it is unreal. Bush got a free pass in 2000 because Gore did so poorly. Now as President he will be raked over the coals for being a clueless moron.
You guys saying that one candidate is a LOCK over the other is comical. At this point, neither candidate has shown the charisma necessary to pull away from the other.
After reading the posting style of many, it seems like a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black with regards to Bush's linguistic shortcomings. There are very few people who speak perfect English.
After reading the posting style of many, it seems like a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black with regards to Bush's linguistic shortcomings. There are very few people who speak perfect English.
Wildbill,
Did you criticize Kerry for dropping F-bombs? Provide the link. Why the double standards?
Chuckie,
Don't ignore it, Bush and Cheney will make those clowns look bad in debates. You may disagree with Bush and Cheney, however, they atleast are sincere in what they believe. Kerry and Edwards do not believe 1/2 the shit they spew, thus making them look foolish trying to be on all sides of ever issue.
Did you criticize Kerry for dropping F-bombs? Provide the link. Why the double standards?
Chuckie,
Don't ignore it, Bush and Cheney will make those clowns look bad in debates. You may disagree with Bush and Cheney, however, they atleast are sincere in what they believe. Kerry and Edwards do not believe 1/2 the shit they spew, thus making them look foolish trying to be on all sides of ever issue.
Chuckie,
By the way I know Bush is not the greatest public speaker around. It really doesn't matter, he's a stead fast leader during a time of war and Americans understand the difficult decision that have to be made. When doing nothing is not an option, I'll take Bush.
The main reason I believe Bush and Cheney will destroy these two clowns are they still believe they can be on every side of every issue and no ones going to notice. Kerry and Edwards voted for the war and now they are against the war. You never know what those two clowns are going to say next.
By the way I know Bush is not the greatest public speaker around. It really doesn't matter, he's a stead fast leader during a time of war and Americans understand the difficult decision that have to be made. When doing nothing is not an option, I'll take Bush.
The main reason I believe Bush and Cheney will destroy these two clowns are they still believe they can be on every side of every issue and no ones going to notice. Kerry and Edwards voted for the war and now they are against the war. You never know what those two clowns are going to say next.
posted July 13, 2004 08:01 PM
"Attacking Iraq is not fighting terrorism you JACKASS!!!!!!!!!! "
now that’s a retarded statement. Please don’t tell me you swallowed the cool aid and buy the Bush/Cheney family oil influence BS.
I agree he should have the balls to go after Syria and Iran but that would be political suicide for starters and two, USA already is fighting 2 fronts and going after a 3rd before either of those two are finished is not in the best interests of the USA. Saddam repeatedly has logistically helped terrorists in the past and did so up until the day the US Marines drove him into a rabbits hole. He has sent $$ to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. If that’s not supporting terrorism then what is? The Saudis do the same shit and Bush definitely should put more pressure on them.
Bush is not perfect but at least he sticks to what he says unlike his democratic opponents.
Kerry was for war then against war
voted resolutions agreeing Iraq was an immanent threat then said he did not support it
he threw his medals away then it was someone else’s medals. Come on vote Kerry because you support what he stands for and not because you hate Bush. Oh wait you cant vote for what Kerry stands for because his mind will change faster than Clinton got Monica out of her g-string.
But at least you are a true American by voting and caring about our political process, for that you get all my respect even if I don’t agree with your political point of view.
"Attacking Iraq is not fighting terrorism you JACKASS!!!!!!!!!! "
now that’s a retarded statement. Please don’t tell me you swallowed the cool aid and buy the Bush/Cheney family oil influence BS.
I agree he should have the balls to go after Syria and Iran but that would be political suicide for starters and two, USA already is fighting 2 fronts and going after a 3rd before either of those two are finished is not in the best interests of the USA. Saddam repeatedly has logistically helped terrorists in the past and did so up until the day the US Marines drove him into a rabbits hole. He has sent $$ to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. If that’s not supporting terrorism then what is? The Saudis do the same shit and Bush definitely should put more pressure on them.
Bush is not perfect but at least he sticks to what he says unlike his democratic opponents.
Kerry was for war then against war
voted resolutions agreeing Iraq was an immanent threat then said he did not support it
he threw his medals away then it was someone else’s medals. Come on vote Kerry because you support what he stands for and not because you hate Bush. Oh wait you cant vote for what Kerry stands for because his mind will change faster than Clinton got Monica out of her g-string.
But at least you are a true American by voting and caring about our political process, for that you get all my respect even if I don’t agree with your political point of view.
You said it Mizike, all Saddam had was money... no WMD, no more atomic physicists, no real military, no trading partners. The little money he had he was trying to remain international, but what could he do... nothing. Peddle some money to families and try like hell to keep up his facade. How did the intelligence get this so fuked up?
It was never a war... but it is an occupation.
It was never a war... but it is an occupation.
you are absolutly wrong. The usa shipped out TONS of nuclear materials from Iraq about 1 month ago. They kept it quite so the insurgents would not try to blow the planes transporting them out of the sky. They also found shells with poison gas buried in the desert wihtin the last few weeks and there are numerous other peices of evidence showing that the WMD do in fact exist they just have not been found in large quantity. A 300,000 standing army before the USA creamed them sounds like a real army to me, Iraq had one of the worlds most experienced army when it came to real combat time no arguing that. They went down so easy for 2 reasons. 1. they did not want to die for Safddams ego. 2. Getting blown up by a missle fired form 1000 miles a way is not the way these guys were used to fighting. They were used to fighting Iranians and Kurds who had out of date weapons. Dont kid yourself just becasue the USA kicked their ass does not mean that they were not a "real army" Do yourself a favor and go read some international news organizations other than relying on the USA TOday the NYT and CNN to spoon feed you the hype.
It was yellowcake and it was old. The reason they didn't make a big deal out of in the press, is not to protect themselves from Iraqis trying to shoot down the planes, but because it was a non-event and a mild find. This stuff was found after Baghdad initially fell, if I remember correctly. It posed no major threat, except to the few Iraqis dumb enough to try to re-use the cylinders it was stored in, so was left sitting there for over a year.
As for those WMD being found ... sarin shells, a total of 22 I think, are what they're finding ... it is suspected that they are from the pre-Gulf I era. Since sarin has a shelf life of only eight years, these finds do not go to support any WMD arguments.
As for those WMD being found ... sarin shells, a total of 22 I think, are what they're finding ... it is suspected that they are from the pre-Gulf I era. Since sarin has a shelf life of only eight years, these finds do not go to support any WMD arguments.
