I am going to say that roughly 20 years ago HBO did a documentary on scamdicappers and a good segment featured the likes of Stu
Feiner, Jack Price and a few others because they epitomized perfect examples of the type of slime that existed back
then.
If HBO or anyone else ever did a follow-up to that special, imo at least half of the show should be devoted to Loser Lang
with glaring examples of his scamdicapping at his finest!!
It goes without saying that if a venture was ever undertaken would have to look no further than this thread for documentation
and no better source to interview than Pimp himself as well as others who have made this long-running thread as successful
as it has been for all of these years!!
ps For me one of the big differences between Feiner and Lang is that as sick as Feiner's sense of humor is, at least once in a while
it is somewhat funny, whereas with Lang with the overwhelming number of times he says anything, the operative
word is "depressing" because he is not funny at all and in short, he is the complete antithesis of normal human beings are/should be
and what they expect to see in others!!
Feiner, Jack Price and a few others because they epitomized perfect examples of the type of slime that existed back
then.
If HBO or anyone else ever did a follow-up to that special, imo at least half of the show should be devoted to Loser Lang
with glaring examples of his scamdicapping at his finest!!
It goes without saying that if a venture was ever undertaken would have to look no further than this thread for documentation
and no better source to interview than Pimp himself as well as others who have made this long-running thread as successful
as it has been for all of these years!!
ps For me one of the big differences between Feiner and Lang is that as sick as Feiner's sense of humor is, at least once in a while
it is somewhat funny, whereas with Lang with the overwhelming number of times he says anything, the operative
word is "depressing" because he is not funny at all and in short, he is the complete antithesis of normal human beings are/should be
and what they expect to see in others!!
Now we look to take that momentun into tonight's action as I up the ante with this 75 dimer and start to turn this thing around like I always have.
Sorry Lang but turning it around tonight was not to be.
Instead you add another 82.5 Dimes to your deficit. But you do get a lovely consolation prize... this lovely turd!
?
?
Sorry Lang but turning it around tonight was not to be.
Instead you add another 82.5 Dimes to your deficit. But you do get a lovely consolation prize... this lovely turd!
?
?LANG 2023 BANKROLL
NEGATIVE 1,264 DIMES
LANG $10 BETTOR DOWN $12,640 (PLUS $1,995 Yearly Fee For Picks = -$14,635)
PAID PICKS: 51-58-2 / 46.7%
-Lang by Month-
DEC 2022: 11-19-1, -1,462 DIMES
JAN: 18-12, +252.5 DIMES
FEB: 13-16, -492.5 DIMES
MAR: 13-17-1, -547 DIMES
APR: 7-13-1, -477 DIMES
-Lang by Week-
WEEK 00: 12/27 to 1/2, (1W-5L) -671.5 DIMES (1W-0L +75 Dimes from 1/1 to 1/2)
WEEK 01: 1/3 to 1/9, (5W-2L) +25 DIMES
WEEK 02: 1/10 to 1/16, (5W-2L) +292.5 DIMES
WEEK 03: 1/17 to 1/23, (3W-4L) -163 DIMES
WEEK 04: 1/24 to 1/30, (3W-4L) -17 DIMES
WEEK 05: 1/31 to 2/6, (3W-4L) -198 DIMES
WEEK 06: 2/7 to 2/13, (4W-4L) -224 DIMES
WEEK 07: 2/14 to 2/20, (3W-4L) -113.5 DIMES
WEEK 08: 2/21 to 2/27, (3W-4L) +53 DIMES
WEEK 09: 2/28 to 3/6, (3W-3L-1P) -185 DIMES
WEEK 10: 3/7 to 3/13, (5W-2L) +156 DIMES
WEEK 11: 3/14 to 3/20, (2W-5L) -293.5 DIMES
WEEK 12: 3/21 to 3/27, (4W-3L) +64 DIMES
WEEK 13: 3/28 to 4/3, (1W-6L) -311.5 DIMES
WEEK 14: 4/4 to 4/10, (2W-4L-1P) -59 DIMES
WEEK 15: 4/11 to 4/17, (3W-4L) -198.5 DIMES
WEEK 16: 4/18 to 4/24, (1W-3L) -166.5 DIMES
NEGATIVE 1,264 DIMES
LANG $10 BETTOR DOWN $12,640 (PLUS $1,995 Yearly Fee For Picks = -$14,635)
PAID PICKS: 51-58-2 / 46.7%
-Lang by Month-
DEC 2022: 11-19-1, -1,462 DIMES
JAN: 18-12, +252.5 DIMES
FEB: 13-16, -492.5 DIMES
MAR: 13-17-1, -547 DIMES
APR: 7-13-1, -477 DIMES
-Lang by Week-
WEEK 00: 12/27 to 1/2, (1W-5L) -671.5 DIMES (1W-0L +75 Dimes from 1/1 to 1/2)
WEEK 01: 1/3 to 1/9, (5W-2L) +25 DIMES
WEEK 02: 1/10 to 1/16, (5W-2L) +292.5 DIMES
WEEK 03: 1/17 to 1/23, (3W-4L) -163 DIMES
WEEK 04: 1/24 to 1/30, (3W-4L) -17 DIMES
WEEK 05: 1/31 to 2/6, (3W-4L) -198 DIMES
WEEK 06: 2/7 to 2/13, (4W-4L) -224 DIMES
WEEK 07: 2/14 to 2/20, (3W-4L) -113.5 DIMES
WEEK 08: 2/21 to 2/27, (3W-4L) +53 DIMES
WEEK 09: 2/28 to 3/6, (3W-3L-1P) -185 DIMES
WEEK 10: 3/7 to 3/13, (5W-2L) +156 DIMES
WEEK 11: 3/14 to 3/20, (2W-5L) -293.5 DIMES
WEEK 12: 3/21 to 3/27, (4W-3L) +64 DIMES
WEEK 13: 3/28 to 4/3, (1W-6L) -311.5 DIMES
WEEK 14: 4/4 to 4/10, (2W-4L-1P) -59 DIMES
WEEK 15: 4/11 to 4/17, (3W-4L) -198.5 DIMES
WEEK 16: 4/18 to 4/24, (1W-3L) -166.5 DIMES
LOSER LANG TRACKER (IN-SEASON SPORTS)
NBA REGULAR SEASON (2022-23)
4-12-2, -442 Dimes
DIME RATINGS
80 DIME: 0-1
75 DIME: 1-2
60 DIME: 0-1-1
40 DIME: 2-4-1
30 DIME: 1-4
NBA PLAYOFFS (2022-23)
1-5, -350.5 Dimes
DIME RATINGS
150 DIME: 0-1
75 DIME: 0-1
50 DIME: 0-1
40 DIME: 1-2
MLB REGULAR SEASON (2023)
5-5, -29.5 Dimes
DIME RATINGS
80 DIME: 0-1
75 DIME: 2-1
60 DIME: 1-1
40 DIME: 2-2
NBA REGULAR SEASON (2022-23)
4-12-2, -442 Dimes
DIME RATINGS
80 DIME: 0-1
75 DIME: 1-2
60 DIME: 0-1-1
40 DIME: 2-4-1
30 DIME: 1-4
NBA PLAYOFFS (2022-23)
1-5, -350.5 Dimes
DIME RATINGS
150 DIME: 0-1
75 DIME: 0-1
50 DIME: 0-1
40 DIME: 1-2
MLB REGULAR SEASON (2023)
5-5, -29.5 Dimes
DIME RATINGS
80 DIME: 0-1
75 DIME: 2-1
60 DIME: 1-1
40 DIME: 2-2
LOSER LANG 10+ YEAR RECORD TRACKER
1/01/2013 up to NOW!!!
NEGATIVE 10,137 DIMES
LANG $10 BETTOR DOWN $101,370 (PLUS $1,995 Yearly Fee For Picks x11 = -$123,315)
-Lang Past 10+ Years-
2023: NEGATIVE 1,264 DIMES (01/01/23 to 04/21/23)
2022: NEGATIVE 1,586.5 DIMES
2021: NEGATIVE 1,524.5 DIMES
2020: POSITIVE* 402.5 DIMES (*NOT A FULL YEAR DUE TO COVID)
2019: NEGATIVE 761.75 DIMES
2018: NEGATIVE 738 DIMES
2017: NEGATIVE 499.5 DIMES
2016: NEGATIVE 2,941.5 DIMES
2015: NEGATIVE 181 DIMES
2014: NEGATIVE 113.75 DIMES
2013: NEGATIVE 929 DIMES
9/01/2007 to 4/16/2010: NEGATIVE** 3,245.7 DIMES (**AS DOCUMENTED BY AL DEMARCO) (NOT INCLUDED IN ABOVE RECORD)
1/01/2013 up to NOW!!!
NEGATIVE 10,137 DIMES
LANG $10 BETTOR DOWN $101,370 (PLUS $1,995 Yearly Fee For Picks x11 = -$123,315)
-Lang Past 10+ Years-
2023: NEGATIVE 1,264 DIMES (01/01/23 to 04/21/23)
2022: NEGATIVE 1,586.5 DIMES
2021: NEGATIVE 1,524.5 DIMES
2020: POSITIVE* 402.5 DIMES (*NOT A FULL YEAR DUE TO COVID)
2019: NEGATIVE 761.75 DIMES
2018: NEGATIVE 738 DIMES
2017: NEGATIVE 499.5 DIMES
2016: NEGATIVE 2,941.5 DIMES
2015: NEGATIVE 181 DIMES
2014: NEGATIVE 113.75 DIMES
2013: NEGATIVE 929 DIMES
9/01/2007 to 4/16/2010: NEGATIVE** 3,245.7 DIMES (**AS DOCUMENTED BY AL DEMARCO) (NOT INCLUDED IN ABOVE RECORD)
A major problem he has is that he is always a day early or a day late with his picks.
Case in point-where was Lang in the first two games of the Celtics/Atlanta series where the Celtics romped!!
Also as been pointed out before, one is not going to win very often when he(Lang) holds grudges against teams because they didn't cover
for him and not bet them again and/or even worse go against them in their next game, which over time is a recipe for disaster!!
Case in point-where was Lang in the first two games of the Celtics/Atlanta series where the Celtics romped!!
Also as been pointed out before, one is not going to win very often when he(Lang) holds grudges against teams because they didn't cover
for him and not bet them again and/or even worse go against them in their next game, which over time is a recipe for disaster!!
Not concerned as I have an endless supply of money. Tommorow I will stick a 100 dimer up the anal cavit
Go big or go home.
I said the other day, eventually a team will do what I handicap them to do.
Unfortunately, inside that statement you can't handicap effort. You can't handicap intensity. You can't handicap killer instinct.
Thursday night the Lakers didn't show up after they won game 1. Anthony Davis played as if he had a date back in LA and wanted to get back there as ASAP.
Last night the Celtics didn't show up after winning the first 2 games in a blowout. To pride yourself on defense and then go out and give up 130 points!!!!
Really???
Then you get a team like the Clippers Thursday night that playing shorthanded, gave you the effort of a lifetime in getting the cover against the Suns.
If the Lakers and Celtics had given that kind of effort, we would be having a different conversation right now.
So here we are on Saturday, in dire need of a big time winner and I truly feel I have it for you in game 3 between the Grizzlies and Lakers.
It's a 100 dimer and it's a winner.
In doing this for over 30 years I always turn it around and go on a run. Every single time.
This will be no different.
It's go time. LFG.
Go big or go home. It's a 100 dimer and it's a winner.
Sure Lang! When it's Saturday and you're trying to real in a sucker, go big with a 100 Dimer.
When your currency is a never ending supply of Monopoly money, go big with a 100 dimer.
When your record in the NBA this season is 5-17 and you are already down 792.5 Dimes, but you keep that information a secret, GO BIG with a 100 DIMER!!!... and make sure you call it a winner before the game even starts for added effect.
Fucking Scammy Clown! ?
Sure Lang! When it's Saturday and you're trying to real in a sucker, go big with a 100 Dimer.
When your currency is a never ending supply of Monopoly money, go big with a 100 dimer.
When your record in the NBA this season is 5-17 and you are already down 792.5 Dimes, but you keep that information a secret, GO BIG with a 100 DIMER!!!... and make sure you call it a winner before the game even starts for added effect.
Fucking Scammy Clown! ?
The trouble with Lang's analysis today and for that matter most of the time is that he makes the same arrogant projection of what the team
he picks to cover is supposed to do according to HIS provincial thinking only with no consideration as to the
motivation or skill of the other team to win/cover.
In short, he treats whoever he bets against to perform up to HIS criterion only like he programmed them to do and/or
as if for example they are the Washington Generals playing the Harlem Globetrotters where the ultimate outcome is never in doubt!!
he picks to cover is supposed to do according to HIS provincial thinking only with no consideration as to the
motivation or skill of the other team to win/cover.
In short, he treats whoever he bets against to perform up to HIS criterion only like he programmed them to do and/or
as if for example they are the Washington Generals playing the Harlem Globetrotters where the ultimate outcome is never in doubt!!
