The Political News of the Day

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
2,772
Tokens
Nothing has been PROVEN fraudulent.

Show me one SPECIFIC example where a poll for this year's Election is FRAUDULENT and WHY!

Again if your definition of "challenge" is to rely on the 2004 Election as some kind proof, then fine, but the "challenge is based on

YOUR OPINION and your opinion only as to how it applies to the 2020 Election.

In my OPINION and Dafinch for reasons stated we believe that 2016 and 2020 cannot not be compared.

What objection do you have as I suggested to starting up a separate thread to discuss this?

Re: the moderators lets just say that I went to them a few days ago because imo my QAnon Thread in the Rubber Room.

Out to do some yard work.

was being flooded an and torpedoed along with name calling and many personal insults against my wife.

Lets just say that I am very pleased with the outcome.

ps PLEASE CITE POLLING SOURCES WHICH SHOW DIFFERING DATA THAN MINE!
I didn't say fraudulent I said pertinent. 2 totally different words and meanings. Think for a second and don't get so emotional.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,167
Tokens
I didn't say fraudulent I said pertinent. 2 totally different words and meanings. Think for a second and don't get so emotional.

Really-did you or not say this in post 220?

"For the last time polling has been proven fraudulent. Not sure what you don't get about that."
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,167
Tokens
Before I go out to do some yard work, I want to remind you folks and the psychic of my post 215 which was in response to what he said.

I notice that he hasn't answered yet, which is his typical opus moderandi of when he asked somethinf which he cannot answer, namely either

ignore or reply with insults to try to change the topic:

Here you go:

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by The Psychic
They are literally brainwashed by what they are fed from the media outlets they follow. Robots that sit there all day posting links with thoughts FROM OTHER PEOPLE or skewed polls that they are fed. Good luck finding threads where they actually debate policies with NO LINKS OR THOUGHTS FROM THOSE WHO FEED THEM are included. Those threads simply do not exist. It is link after link after link. A 5 year old could post that stuff



As I asked rush_man, are Rasmussen and Fox Polling Data skewed to the left, yes or no, please?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
2,772
Tokens
Really-did you or not say this in post 220?

"For the last time polling has been proven fraudulent. Not sure what you don't get about that."

You should then respond to the post you are answering to.

Polling has been proven fraudulent. In this age of information being so accurate and up to date in the computer information age there is no excuse to be that far off in 2016. The only explanation is the left rigging the polling results. That would be the definition of fraudulent. I hope I cleared that up.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
2,772
Tokens
Before I go out to do some yard work, I want to remind you folks and the psychic of my post 215 which was in response to what he said.

I notice that he hasn't answered yet, which is his typical opus moderandi of when he asked somethinf which he cannot answer, namely either

ignore or reply with insults to try to change the topic:

Here you go:

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by The Psychic
They are literally brainwashed by what they are fed from the media outlets they follow. Robots that sit there all day posting links with thoughts FROM OTHER PEOPLE or skewed polls that they are fed. Good luck finding threads where they actually debate policies with NO LINKS OR THOUGHTS FROM THOSE WHO FEED THEM are included. Those threads simply do not exist. It is link after link after link. A 5 year old could post that stuff



As I asked rush_man, are Rasmussen and Fox Polling Data skewed to the left, yes or no, please?

I don't know and I don't care because thats not the point I am making. We will have to just move on from this.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,167
Tokens
I don't know and I don't care because thats not the point I am making. We will have to just move on from this.

What I said ooriginally was addressed to the psychic and not you.

I don't want to be too cocky, but lets just see who wins in November if the polling data is right

and see as one poster predicts that "it will be the biggest landslide in history" for Trump.

I expect hopefully soon to get some resolution one way or the other from moderator as to what is allowed

is going to be allowed in this thread and what is not.

Bye
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
You should then respond to the post you are answering to.

Polling has been proven fraudulent. In this age of information being so accurate and up to date in the computer information age there is no excuse to be that far off in 2016. The only explanation is the left rigging the polling results. That would be the definition of fraudulent. I hope I cleared that up.

You are wasting your time brother. He literally does not have the ability to think beyond what he is told or fed. They live in a bubble and having 2 sides to a story or even being wrong is just foreign to them.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
1,711
Tokens
Meanwhile, more important NEWs of today:


Facebook takes down
Trump ads



Sources:
https://tinyurl.com/y77hqdz8
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ls/3215820001/



WASHINGTON – Facebook moved Thursday to remove ads f
rom President Donald Trump's re-election campaign that the
company said violated its policies on "organized hate" and
were a "banned hate group's symbol."

The image attached to the ad was a downward-pointing red triangle,
which Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt noted on
Twitter was the symbol the Nazis used to identify political victims in
concentration camps.

"We removed these posts and ads for violating our policy against
organized hate. Our policy prohibits using a banned hate group's
symbol to identify political prisoners without the context that
condemns or discusses the symbol," Andy Stone, a Facebook
spokesperson, told CNN Business.

we$$$

Please push MY THREADS to the TOP of the forum read list! THANKS!!!
:ok:
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,167
Tokens
Before I go out to do some yard work, I want to remind you folks and the psychic of my post 224 which was in response to what he said.

I notice that he hasn't answered yet, which is his typical opus moderandi of when he asked somethinf which he cannot answer, namely either

ignore or reply with insults to try to change the topic:

Here you go:

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by The Psychic
They are literally brainwashed by what they are fed from the media outlets they follow. Robots that sit there all day posting links with thoughts FROM OTHER PEOPLE or skewed polls that they are fed. Good luck finding threads where they actually debate policies with NO LINKS OR THOUGHTS FROM THOSE WHO FEED THEM are included. Those threads simply do not exist. It is link after link after link. A 5 year old could post that stuff



As I asked rush_man, are Rasmussen and Fox Polling Data skewed to the left, yes or no, please?


I am reposting and correcting this to read post 224 rather than 215 stated originally.

I stand by what say about the psychic's modus operandi here and there are to many examples to count in the past where he has done the same thing

if you don't know already.

I ask the psychic to respond to this other than with name calling and insults.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
2,772
Tokens
I am reposting and correcting this to read post 224 rather than 215 stated originally.

I stand by what say about the psychic's modus operandi here and there are to many examples to count in the past where he has done the same thing

if you don't know already.

I ask the psychic to respond to this other than with name calling and insults.

he seems reasonable. is it possible you're just a bit sensitive?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,167
Tokens
Thanks Lishy for complying with my requests for this thread.

I am hoping that everyone else does the same and stays on target with their comments re; the purpose of thread itself,, in order

that folks can come here for information about the Election, polling data, the candidates and related matters

as well as providing their own news, information and links for related material that I left out and/or did not see.

Is it really asking too much for at least one thread in the Political Forum to be peaceful and for useful information and not subject

to attacks on someone(in this case me) who is simply providing news as I see it whether it be good for Trump and Biden and/or bad for

them.

There are lots of other places where people can attack one another without needing to do so here.

This is a news reporting thread only for the benefit of all.

I report what I see to try to be helpful-so be it if you want to believe otherwise.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
he seems reasonable. is it possible you're just a bit sensitive?

He goes around asking people “How does Trump’s dick taste”

But

Everyone else is the problem. Remember what I said. You are arguing with a very biased, delusional person here.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,167
Tokens
he seems reasonable. is it possible you're just a bit sensitive?

Perhaps if the posts are still there in the Rubber Room from my "What the QAnon's Are All About," and "Today's Trump News Threads,"

I suggest you go over there and read some of the vile things/insulting things/lies he said about me and my wife

since I came over here in August and his zillion rapid fire succession in which he posted them immediately after I posted them, perhaps

you might come away with a different impression.

To cut to the chase he and everyone else was warned by a moderator yesterday NOT to get into family with their insults and the results so far

have been great.

Again I don't know how many remain, but I guarantee you that there were too many name calling on part of the psychic

to count as directed at me and especially TOTAL lies about my wife.

If that is what you deem as being a "bit sensitive," lets just say that I respectfully disagree.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,167
Tokens
Also the psychic says that I said "How does Trump's dick taste?

Yes in a moment of anger I did say this to one the psychic's buddies, StevieRay..

WHAT DOESN'T tell you in his one way reporting is that immediately before that, Stevie as he has done too many times to count, referred to my very fine,

classy, loving wife to whom i have been happily married to for 24 years, as a WHORE because she happens to have been born in Colombia.

I am and have always been a polite and respectful person by nature unless of course provoked.

I will leave it at that to be considered as well as those familiar with me and the psychic to decide if they believe that and also what they think about the

manner in which I deem him to be, namely a bully and a coward, whose only purpose is to to instigate trouble when he sees an opportunity!

ps I am still awaiting an answer from psychic from what I asked in post 224.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
Also the psychic says that I said "How does Trump's dick taste?

Yes in a moment of anger I did say this to one the psychic's buddies, StevieRay..

WHAT DOESN'T tell you in his one way reporting is that immediately before that, Stevie as he has done too many times to count, referred to my very fine,

classy, loving wife to whom i have been happily married to for 24 years, as a WHORE because she happens to have been born in Colombia.

I am and have always been a polite and respectful person by nature unless of course provoked.

I will leave it at that to be considered as well as those familiar with me and the psychic to decide if they believe that and also what they think about the

manner in which I deem him to be, namely a bully and a coward, whose only purpose is to to instigate trouble when he sees an opportunity!

ps I am still awaiting an answer from psychic from what I asked in post 224.

Always making excuses for your actions. It’s never your fault. It’s always he did it first. That works if you are 10 years old. When you are 75, you should say yes, it was wrong and leave it at that. Take responsibility without excuses.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
2,772
Tokens
Also the psychic says that I said "How does Trump's dick taste?

Yes in a moment of anger I did say this to one the psychic's buddies, StevieRay..

that does seem a bit harsh and telling. I have read some from SR and he seems to be a reasonable person.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,117,967
Messages
13,549,833
Members
100,550
Latest member
teaanime019
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com