Hey lunatic, call me whatever name you want. I have stayed WELL WITHIN the guidelines i was given by bas. You do not get to decide what i can and cannot post. And i suggest you stop making threats asshole because i can easily return the favor with everything i know about you, which is a lot more than you think.
I almost forgot-for the sixth time I request that the psychicpost something re: to what I posted yesterday in 250.
If the moderators/Administration believe that what the psychic and others said re: what was posted yesterday is ALL acceptable in view of the spirit
and intent of the thread, I will accept it but escalate to a higher level to get closure.
If they also agree, then at least I will have peace of mind and will just keep doing what I am doing over here-it is that simple!
If the moderators/Administration believe that what the psychic and others said re: what was posted yesterday is ALL acceptable in view of the spirit
and intent of the thread, I will accept it but escalate to a higher level to get closure.
If they also agree, then at least I will have peace of mind and will just keep doing what I am doing over here-it is that simple!
There is just one more thing for now.
rush_man made some comments that the polls I used to show that Trump is getting clobbered are skewed to the left
I pointed out to him that polling groups such as Rasmussen and Fox News which are skewed to the Right, show the same results.
Anywhere to be clear re: my fairness and objectivity with these polls, and you can save the post, I say this.
If at any time between now and November the polls show that Trump has forged into the lead, and I don't post the links which show
the results and which polling firms are showing this, I will place a permanent ban on myself from the ENTIRE FORUM and will send a PM to moderators
and Administration in order to be sure that they see it to enforce this permanent ban.
I will also copy my PM and post it here in his thread for all to see.
rush_man made some comments that the polls I used to show that Trump is getting clobbered are skewed to the left
I pointed out to him that polling groups such as Rasmussen and Fox News which are skewed to the Right, show the same results.
Anywhere to be clear re: my fairness and objectivity with these polls, and you can save the post, I say this.
If at any time between now and November the polls show that Trump has forged into the lead, and I don't post the links which show
the results and which polling firms are showing this, I will place a permanent ban on myself from the ENTIRE FORUM and will send a PM to moderators
and Administration in order to be sure that they see it to enforce this permanent ban.
I will also copy my PM and post it here in his thread for all to see.
No thats not what I said. And everybody knows it. I will say it one more time for you though. I said all polls are fraudulent and/or highly inaccurate due to the ease of manipulation of such polls regardless of the news group. If fair and balanced Fox took a poll thats their business. They don't have any meaning after what happened in 2016.
As for you - you don't have to leave just redact that statement and try to calm on the drama. You're fine here just like the rest of us. You staying or leaving doesn't change anything so just stay or go depending on how you feel. We don't need some silly challenge to decide it.
ok. heres a link from fair and balanced fox. although i thought everyone knew of this. like i said it should be a fun event.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tu...l-exclusion-zone-curfew-ahead-of-trumps-rally
ointer: 
I stand by what I say in order to let folks know that I am going to be fair and objective about how I run this thread and if not, in this case by
alluding to hiding polling data favorable to Trump and what I will do if I don't comply-it is that simple and sends a clear and strong message.
If you choose to refer to it as a "silly challenge," that is your opinion and right, but it won't change how I view it.
I will let the results of the Election and the concurrent polling data speak whether the polling data is "fraudulent" or not.
More importantly, I suggest that you post some kind of links re: the news of the day re: the election and/or news of the day re: the candidates
themselves in order to keep things on target relative to the purpose and intentions of this thread.
ps I have no problem with what you/the psychic just posted because it does contain news!
That said, if I see posts from the IVU Thread posted over here, which are simply reposts from denigrating Biden, well I will do what
I stated I will do yesterday in flooding his thread with posts I deem to be relevant along the same lines.
They LOVE links
They are literally brainwashed by what they are fed from the media outlets they follow. Robots that sit there all day posting links with thoughts FROM OTHER PEOPLE or skewed polls that they are fed. Good luck finding threads where they actually debate policies with NO LINKS OR THOUGHTS FROM THOSE WHO FEED THEM are included. Those threads simply do not exist. It is link after link after link.
Those comments have nothing to do with the intent and purpose of this thread, and are going to especially
noted in my documentation when I get my day in court.
That's it at least as far as responding to you until later on today, by which time hopefully I will have gotten a response to what I submitted yesterday
to the moderators.
PS REQUEST #7 regarding what I asked from you in post 250.
How come no answer???
A Tulsa, Okla., judge blocked an emergency attempt to keep President Trump’s upcoming campaign rally from happening as planned after plaintiffs claimed that it would be a coronavirus “super-spreader” that would endanger the public.
The lawsuit, brought by two Oklahoma residents who say they are immuno-compromised, claim that the rally poses a danger because the expected large crowd will not be following social distancing practices and will not be required to wear face masks. They filed an emergency motion seeking a temporary restraining order so the event would not be able to go on as planned.
“It does not appear by the Petition that Plaintiffs are entitled to the relief demanded,” Judge Rebecca Brett Nightingale said in a one-page order.
The lawsuit, brought by two Oklahoma residents who say they are immuno-compromised, claim that the rally poses a danger because the expected large crowd will not be following social distancing practices and will not be required to wear face masks. They filed an emergency motion seeking a temporary restraining order so the event would not be able to go on as planned.
“It does not appear by the Petition that Plaintiffs are entitled to the relief demanded,” Judge Rebecca Brett Nightingale said in a one-page order.
