Almost forgotten - but what would be HEADLINE NEWS any week prior to March -
is that in adolf trump's America, another 1.5 MILLION Americans filed for
first time unemployment. I think that brings this unprecedented RECORD total
unemployed to over 47 MILLION ........all on trump's watch
Please reply and push this thread to the TOP of the forum read list! THANKS!!!k:
The-Psycho, Willie9.9-IQ, SheriffJoanne, fosteringSh!ts, rollTigers!, NFLkneels, ihateME82, StevieHates, scamDaze, cybersh!t, exploited12yo, Gas_'m-all, rjrwrjr, bustHerchops, DaveDukeinLV, TrannyHawk, Coldwillie, TimmyRude, roadkill57, REDeyesfromMeth, MichaelAndGigolo, brendanjackoff, so_lie, sportsIQ-60, theDonger, seeLESS, clevertheaf,
To be clear and fair, I request that you delete references and names at the bottom as they are considered offensive and not within the spirit of the thread.
thanks
Most of their polls are also done with 60%-75% of those polled being democrat. Same as 2016. People can go anywhere and take a poll that fits their narrative. They are also posting polls where around 1,000 people participated. That is around 0.000001% of the population. That literally tells you nothing and means nothing. Just garbage but it makes them feel good
that is absolutely the most senseless commentary i've seen on this. polling data is polling data. who are you going to vote for is the question. not how many issues are currently being argued about in this country. and what is "just about legitimate polling"? means that it could be not legit? Either way you don't present a case for polling to be taken seriously when it was mocked and ridiculed 4 years ago.
finally i am amused at your continued so call neutrality stance when it comes to what side you are coming from. your news of the day come from a leftist view point and its not difficult and i believe shows a laziness to just glom onto the latest liberal news posting. they are everywhere on every day.
The discussion between rush-man and the psychic has ZERO to do with the purpose of this thread.
If you disagree with the polling data, take it up with the polling firms and not here, as I am simply reporting it.
Post your own links in support of what you believe to be correct and/or start a new thread about polling, but not in this
thread which is to report the political news (with links) of the day.
If you disagree with the polling data, take it up with the polling firms and not here, as I am simply reporting it.
Post your own links in support of what you believe to be correct and/or start a new thread about polling, but not in this
thread which is to report the political news (with links) of the day.
They are literally brainwashed by what they are fed from the media outlets they follow. Robots that sit there all day posting links with thoughts FROM OTHER PEOPLE or skewed polls that they are fed. Good luck finding threads where they actually debate policies with NO LINKS OR THOUGHTS FROM THOSE WHO FEED THEM are included. Those threads simply do not exist. It is link after link after link. A 5 year old could post that stuff
This is going to be my last response until my issues here are resolved one way or the other.
Imo you have not stated any facts which have any bearing on the current situation.
I gave my OPINION as to why 2016 and 2020 cannot be compared-if you don't believe them and or agree, fine.,
What are FACTS are the current unanimous polling day showing Trump losing.
If you want to dispute those facts with your OPINIONS about your "facts," then so be it.
ucking:Although I am awaiting resolution from the higher-ups as to the relevance of a lot of the posts today,
I still think that it would be a good idea to start a separate thread entitled something along the lines of "What do you think of this years polling
data regarding accuracy for the 2020 Election?" and/or "what do you think of political polling in general?'
That makes a lot more sense and fair in terms of the objectives and purpose of the thread as stated in the title and Post 1, rather than typing up this
thread with ot thoughts and commentary.
I still think that it would be a good idea to start a separate thread entitled something along the lines of "What do you think of this years polling
data regarding accuracy for the 2020 Election?" and/or "what do you think of political polling in general?'
That makes a lot more sense and fair in terms of the objectives and purpose of the thread as stated in the title and Post 1, rather than typing up this
thread with ot thoughts and commentary.
You've been challenged for leaving a lot of pertinent information out of your posts. You stated your only rule is no name calling. If another rule is don't challenge anything with me in my threads state it. You're just making it up as you go. And its childish to run to mods because your points are being challenged
Nothing has been PROVEN fraudulent.
Show me one SPECIFIC example where a poll for this year's Election is FRAUDULENT and WHY!
Again if your definition of "challenge" is to rely on the 2004 Election as some kind proof, then fine, but the "challenge is based on
YOUR OPINION and your opinion only as to how it applies to the 2020 Election.
In my OPINION and Dafinch for reasons stated we believe that 2016 and 2020 cannot not be compared.
What objection do you have as I suggested to starting up a separate thread to discuss this?
Re: the moderators lets just say that I went to them a few days ago because imo my QAnon Thread in the Rubber Room.
Out to do some yard work.
was being flooded an and torpedoed along with name calling and many personal insults against my wife.
Lets just say that I am very pleased with the outcome.
ps PLEASE CITE POLLING SOURCES WHICH SHOW DIFFERING DATA THAN MINE!
