Dogball,
You are 100% correct to be upset at the way I intially worded my response.
After reading it, I took it down within 5 minutes and replaced it with the one above, because I wanted to be fair to you..
I am on the phone with Patrick now and we both would like to talk to you later...
Please call me back as soon as it is convenient for you....
Thanks,
Ken
You are 100% correct to be upset at the way I intially worded my response.
After reading it, I took it down within 5 minutes and replaced it with the one above, because I wanted to be fair to you..
I am on the phone with Patrick now and we both would like to talk to you later...
Please call me back as soon as it is convenient for you....
Thanks,
Ken
Ken, I notice that you mention nothing about Sirbet's agent down in TX who made threats towards dogball and his family. You ok with that? If you are gonna post conversations that I allegedly had, please make sure that you confirm that it was ME who engaged in them. Please also be aware that you may not be in posession of certain conversations with Sirbet's agent. GL
hamneggs,
Once again, you are trying to divert everyone's attention from the REAL issue, which I made very clear in my prior post...
Regarding the agent (since you brought it up), he has been severely reprimanded by SIRBET for posting on this thread.
I don't have any proof that threats were made to Dogball, but if YOU do, then please share the tape with me, and I suspect that SIRBET would fire this guy...
THE SHRINK
Once again, you are trying to divert everyone's attention from the REAL issue, which I made very clear in my prior post...
Regarding the agent (since you brought it up), he has been severely reprimanded by SIRBET for posting on this thread.
I don't have any proof that threats were made to Dogball, but if YOU do, then please share the tape with me, and I suspect that SIRBET would fire this guy...
THE SHRINK
Ken, it is my own opinion that this sportsbook is low and did not intend to pay dogball when he was up on them. I say that because of the fishy plays they entered on his behalf, the payout runaround, and lastly the thugs that they align themselves with.
If you see it differently, that is fine by me.
I don't think that their agent's actions are irrelevant. I realize that they are disparaging to Sirbet, but I do not think that they are very far removed from the REAL issue which is the integrity of this sportsbook.
That is my own opinion and it has been stated excessively above. It is not my intent to usurp your site or keep this thread on page one for years to come. With that said, I have nothing more to add to this subject unless you choose to post conversations that I allegedly participated in.
If you see it differently, that is fine by me.
I don't think that their agent's actions are irrelevant. I realize that they are disparaging to Sirbet, but I do not think that they are very far removed from the REAL issue which is the integrity of this sportsbook.
That is my own opinion and it has been stated excessively above. It is not my intent to usurp your site or keep this thread on page one for years to come. With that said, I have nothing more to add to this subject unless you choose to post conversations that I allegedly participated in.
hamneggs,
I really appreciate your last response, which I consider to be your wisest...
I will talk to dogball, and hopefully, we can resolve this off of the forums, which I would have preferred to do in the first place...
I also undertand about being loyal to a friend...
But to try and tarnish the reputaton of a good sports book in the process is just wrong!
Peace,
THE SHRINK
I really appreciate your last response, which I consider to be your wisest...
I will talk to dogball, and hopefully, we can resolve this off of the forums, which I would have preferred to do in the first place...
I also undertand about being loyal to a friend...
But to try and tarnish the reputaton of a good sports book in the process is just wrong!
Peace,
THE SHRINK
Enjoying my first cup coffee of the day.
I understand that Sirbet also ignored a payout request
Ken, it is my own opinion that this sportsbook is low and did not intend to pay dogball when he was up on them.
hamneggs,
1) How much $$$ dogball was up on them??
2) Is Sirbet still ignore the payout request??
If yes, What is the amount??
Hamneggs and dogball,
Don't get me wrong, i just want to know more info on this issue. I appreciate if you can answer my two questions.
I understand that Sirbet also ignored a payout request
Ken, it is my own opinion that this sportsbook is low and did not intend to pay dogball when he was up on them.
hamneggs,
1) How much $$$ dogball was up on them??
2) Is Sirbet still ignore the payout request??
If yes, What is the amount??
Hamneggs and dogball,
Don't get me wrong, i just want to know more info on this issue. I appreciate if you can answer my two questions.
I've seen some weird thread before but this one might make my top 10. From reading all of it one would assume there's a problem with settling an account properly. Ken and Dogball are talking now and hopefully this is getting straightened out. I think Hammy's gone a little overboard on keeping this issue alive.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BSkiller:
max1234,
I agree on that.
As Patrick McIrish said,
"When you do things like this and try and ruin a good book you not only hurt your future reputation you also can hurt a lot of hard working folks.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I was done with this thread, but it appears as though posters now want to take pot shots and call this shop a standup shop despite their efforts to stiff dogball. That's right, folks, when a bookie ignores a payout request, that is a stiff in my mind. Maybe I am a bit tougher than most--so be it.
Let's go ahead and continue this debate boys..here we go, I am into it. Will debate this for as long as anyone wants to, let's do it.
You are calling this a "good book"? Why are they a "good book" in light of their failure to honor a payout request? Is that our new standard for a "good book"? Come on, guys, i wanna hear you back this shop..
I wanna hear you make an excuse for a sportsbook that test drives its software on its company.
Pat, you calling this a "good book" sounds a lot like calling someone a "standup guy" which I know that you can't stand. If you look at the first post in this thread:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>I do not want to hear people chiming in about how "rock solid" this shop is. Instead, I want to hear a reasonable explanation that is well founded in fact and logic.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I knew that people would come in here and call this a good shop and completely ignore the what transpired.
There is no reason to pay this sportsbook ONE PENNY..how u like that boys? Not a frickin' CENT! They intended to stiff dogball, and it is evidenced by the fact that they ignored him when he called to request a payout.
What other conclusions can you draw when dogball calls SIRBET and leaves 2 messages a day for Corby to call on TWO consecutive days and Corby does not call back for FIVE days? Obviously, Corby knows that the longer a gambler leaves funds in his account, the more likely he is to lose that money. That is a shady shop boys, whether they advertise here or not.
So how in the world do you call this a "good book"? I wanna hear all the reasons why in light of their trying out their software on their clients..LOL...a mysterious 6 team parlay? The wrong amounts on plays, but ONLY the losing plays boys. Go figure.
Wouldn't you know it that when they had the chance to respond, they failed and refused to.
Link Oh, and the same schills are in that thread that you see here like BSkiller.
They even scored a rainout game as a loser, hoping that he would not notice. How could a sportsbook be so dumb?
max1234,
I agree on that.
As Patrick McIrish said,
"When you do things like this and try and ruin a good book you not only hurt your future reputation you also can hurt a lot of hard working folks.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I was done with this thread, but it appears as though posters now want to take pot shots and call this shop a standup shop despite their efforts to stiff dogball. That's right, folks, when a bookie ignores a payout request, that is a stiff in my mind. Maybe I am a bit tougher than most--so be it.
Let's go ahead and continue this debate boys..here we go, I am into it. Will debate this for as long as anyone wants to, let's do it.
You are calling this a "good book"? Why are they a "good book" in light of their failure to honor a payout request? Is that our new standard for a "good book"? Come on, guys, i wanna hear you back this shop..
I wanna hear you make an excuse for a sportsbook that test drives its software on its company.
Pat, you calling this a "good book" sounds a lot like calling someone a "standup guy" which I know that you can't stand. If you look at the first post in this thread:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>I do not want to hear people chiming in about how "rock solid" this shop is. Instead, I want to hear a reasonable explanation that is well founded in fact and logic.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I knew that people would come in here and call this a good shop and completely ignore the what transpired.
There is no reason to pay this sportsbook ONE PENNY..how u like that boys? Not a frickin' CENT! They intended to stiff dogball, and it is evidenced by the fact that they ignored him when he called to request a payout.
What other conclusions can you draw when dogball calls SIRBET and leaves 2 messages a day for Corby to call on TWO consecutive days and Corby does not call back for FIVE days? Obviously, Corby knows that the longer a gambler leaves funds in his account, the more likely he is to lose that money. That is a shady shop boys, whether they advertise here or not.
So how in the world do you call this a "good book"? I wanna hear all the reasons why in light of their trying out their software on their clients..LOL...a mysterious 6 team parlay? The wrong amounts on plays, but ONLY the losing plays boys. Go figure.
Wouldn't you know it that when they had the chance to respond, they failed and refused to.
Link Oh, and the same schills are in that thread that you see here like BSkiller.
They even scored a rainout game as a loser, hoping that he would not notice. How could a sportsbook be so dumb?
