So to reduce this down to plain English and as few words as possible:
Joe Paterno, a guy to whom Penn State Football was his entire Identity pretty much (
all else he at least "publicly was" emanated from Penn State Football)
Voluntarily and "of sound mind and body"
Elected to place at risk:
- The Safety and Well Being of Innocent Children
- Penn State Football
- Penn State University
- His Reputation, that meant so so much to him
- The Sanity and Peace of his Family and Friends
- His LEGACY
In exchange for what gain?
Because he fears if he fires Sandusky "why" will get found out and cause damage to the program?
Because he doesn't believe what he is hearing about Sandusky?
Do you guys really believe sincerely in your hearts that Joe Paterno elected to turn his back on Kids? Allow Sandusky to......WHEN HE KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON.....continue?
We've got such a Low Threshold of "proof" here, needed to accomplish getting a Payout from Penn State that....again....average payout was THREE MILLION DOLLARS so we are talking about Big Money here.
Just for saying that Sandusky did bad stuff to you.
Which seems more
plausible?
I don't doubt Sandusky was up to some strange bad very inappropriate stuff and deserves punishment, I am NOT defending that monster in the least here just asking which seems more plausible...
that people seized a once in a lifetime chance at a big payday that would change their lives forever or
The Most Revered and (eventual) all-time winningest football coach alive
Voluntarily and "of sound mind and body"
Elected to place at risk:
- The Safety and Well Being of Innocent Children
- Penn State Football
- Penn State University
- His Reputation, that meant so so much to him
- The Sanity and Peace of his Family and Friends
- His LEGACY
To protect Jerry Sandusky. A guy it is well known that he did not even particularly like?
which of those seems more plausible?