Yeah I completely understand all that. All I am speaking about is from an investment standpoint.
Yeah the USD will collapse eventually but I don't plan on being close to alive by then so why does it belong in my portfolio in a stockpiling for disaster sense if I'll probably be dead by the time that doom comes? I'm saying for all these people that stockpile gold I think they are missing out on stockpiling assets that actually produce something (be it dividends with a product mankind needs, real estate, farmland etc)
I know this is far out there shit, but what do you think of it being taken from you in a time of mass chaos?
You can trace back to 2k yrs ago when people used gold to trade/exchange...etc until gold officially became legal currency in early 1700s. Imagine what a society looked like two thousand years ago....lawless, chaos, disaster, uncertainty,...etc..you name it...yet people chose to use gold as a mean to store value.
Since you're talking about investment standpoint, the US got rid of gold standard in 1971, one once of gold was trading @$40, but that was then, it's $1600/once now. Another way to look at it is:
Gold price:
1971: $40/once
2013: $1600/once
4000% gain
S&P:
1971: 65
2013: 1560
2400% gain
How about we just look at Berkshire stock to see how it does compare to gold since 2007? Berkshire Class-A stock gains 10% since 2007, gold is doubling in price withing the same period. So, what is exactly, in your opinion, gold bugs are missing out?
It's amusing me every time when the indexes hit a new high, people quickly go out full force and bash gold bugs and cheerleading Warren Buffet as a hero when you should be thanking these guys....
They've been printing a combined of $8 trillion since 2007 to prop up the market. Without them, your investment porfolio is worthless as a toilet paper.
When the market crashed 50% from 2008-09, gold gained 12% in the same period, that's a another fact.
You're missing the point entirely, not surprising.
The point is gold is outperforming stocks in long term, short term, medium term, small term...or whatever.....you name it.
If you based your opinion in 1 yr data from 2012, apparently that the impression I got from Warren Buffet, then stocks WIN.
But who cares about one year run? Throwing in every dividends that you can find, gold is giving investors a steady 20% return annually in the last 40 yrs, only a few stock....Apple came to mind would beat that.
I'm providing you FACTS, I can't possibly be any more honest than that.
Those are cold FACTS. That's okay if you don't agree with them. Now, for the record, only 1/4 of my assets is GOLD, 1/4 is a real estate (my house), 1/4 stocks, and the rest is cash which my trading account. The market crashed twice in the last 15 yrs and it wiped out million of people. How many time has gold crashed in the same period? You can pretend that's everything is okay and that's fine if you're putting total faith on the central bankers. You just hope that the market won't crash 1 or 2 years before you retire, otherwise, you're screwed, just like million folks who happened to retire in 2002 and 2009.
Do what best for your investment.
But putting everything in paper assets? Not for me.
I just re-check it, S&P was actually trading @110, that's even worse comparing to gold since then.
Whether you admit it or not, gold has racked up 4000% gain since 1971.
The 38% also with Divys reinvested ...
Bottom line gold going up long term and will significantly outperform the S&P during times our money masters fook up the economy
also just a little tidbit since no believe in divy (brk dont pay one) warren estanlishment whore is the quoted source for gold hating
S&p gain since 71 1559% no Divys, 5751% with Divys reinvest
Seems like its more than that but ... Anyway figured I'd google S&P with dividends reinvested and find a calculator to provide the numbers lol
Gold good during times of doom ... S&P good during times of fun and bubbles forming ...
Its a fairly simple concept Lol