Again that's based on feelings not math. You are entitled to make a decision based on feelings but you're ignoring math. I don't know why you refuse to admit that. I don't even blame you for making that decision.
There have been 2 bets at this forum that I've decided to skip. Both times Zit came in calling me a pussy. I've accepted and offered many bets. Has he? Has he ever called Acebb or Joe a pussy for never accepting one bet of the 9 I offered?
he starts polls, threads about me all the time. He looks like an idiot but at a place where idiots are King....most don't know to tell him.
It's because I believe mich will probably make a run based on his past performance. If a guy hits 51 percent for a few years.....my guess is he will eventually get somewhat close to that number after a full season. Which would give him a better two months than me but not s better overall season. Its about regressing to the mean and I don't think you can compare that to how many times a coin will flip on heads.
All the factors together makes it a dumb bet for me in my opinion....I think it's obvious as do some other posters
Exactly...which means I have a huge winning year and he had a huge losing year.
Then I pay him a thousand and he is the winner of a baseball handicapping contest. Silly
Lies.
I'm calling you out on this one, because you said some really retarded things, comically stupid.
The astute posters in here see it very clearly.
Hah, no. It means he pays you 1,000 when he hits 53% in the 2nd half and you hit 55%. Wow.
Congrats, Vit. My 5K post was me repeating myself to you for 25th time today.
Call out what? It's true. I have countless bets in here and you never say a word. You never comment on Acebb and Joe who decline all bets I offer. Why not? Just a comment when I decline a bet for good reason.
No. As I have said 20 times already, Vit will likely revert back to his 55% and Mich to his 53%.
Hah, no. If you are a career 55%er and he is a career 53%er the odds are you go 55% and he goes 53% in the second half.
Actually I did ask Ace multiple times why he didn't take certain bets that you offered, and I offered to take the bets, but you said it was only for Ace.
These aren't really accurate numbers. Just using them as example. A 2 month sample is not as accurate as a full season shows.
Again, I'm not paying a guy that loses 60 dimes while I win 13 dimes and he gets credit for a contest win and a thousand bucks.
Say it out loud and then think about. Vit wins 13k, Mich loses 59k. Vit pays mich 1,000 for his contest win.
These aren't really accurate numbers. Just using them as example. A 2 month sample is not as accurate as a full season shows.
Again, I'm not paying a guy that loses 60 dimes while I win 13 dimes and he gets credit for a contest win and a thousand bucks.
Say it out loud and then think about. Vit wins 13k, Mich loses 59k. Vit pays mich 1,000 for his contest win.
what is 55%/53% based on? the next role? this cards?
it's based on a season. Every season , on average, Vit wins 55% of his bets. April to Sept . He's 75% ytd. You bettign WITH HIM OR NOT?....at this point?......sounds like you're betting against him, as he will 'revert to the mean'. You using historical data to influence a future decision?