you cannot honestly say that unless you were actually part of the grand jury. you're speculating as are most people. No disrespect but what you read and watched means shit. your vote doesn't affect someone's life. Should we suddenly convict or exonerate people based on media reports or what some say on the internet?I'm not for that. I do think based on what I have read and watched of this case, I would have voted to indict.
Not to say I would vote guilty at a trial, but to indict, yes.
Before anybody jumps to conclusions. Garner has 31 prior arrests and is a career criminal. He also happens to be a fat piece of shit who was also a chain smoker. Just about anything could have killed this guy on any given day of the week.
Yes, you are qualified to form an opinion to indict somebody because you watch CNN. Good for you.
you cannot honestly say that unless you were actually part of the grand jury. you're speculating as are most people. No disrespect but what you read and watched means shit. your vote doesn't affect someone's life. Should we suddenly convict or exonerate people based on media reports or what some say on the internet?
Yes, you are qualified to form an opinion to indict somebody because you watch CNN. Good for you.
The problem is that NYC cops are arrest happy. They knew who he was. Why not just give him a ticket requiring him to go before a judge?
Think about it. This guy died over what comes down to a tax avoidance issue. He died for not paying taxes.
The Rockefeller center tree lighting will be very interesting tonight.
word up