feels like they've overcompensated a bit on 1st H unders at end of season and conf tourney, as so many of these are skewed higher than normal on what a 1st H total should be compared to full game. Hence why so many are missing by 1-2 pts like Michigan. 64 on a 137.5 total
feels like they've overcompensated a bit on 1st H unders at end of season and conf tourney, as so many of these are skewed higher than normal on what a 1st H total should be compared to full game. Hence why so many are missing by 1-2 pts like Michigan. 64 on a 137.5 total
There is usually a 10 point difference from 1H and 2H totals. Obviously the late game fouling is a big reason for this. The Michigan line was right in line with the FG total
I won the first half under on Michigan/CSU. I took it at 65.5 and posted it as that the other day.
Sorry you guys got snake bit on that one. I thought it was going to go under by a few points.
Higher seeds in the NCAA Tournament that force at least 16 turnovers per game are 44-22-1 ATS (66.7%) in the last 15-plus years and 13-1-1 ATS in the last 15 games
There are three higher seeds that force at least 16 turnovers per game in the first round of the NCAA Tournament: UAB (vs. Houston), Georgia State (vs. Gonzaga) and Iowa State (vs. LSU).
Looks like Richmond may put a stop to the undefeated streak for favorites. Iowa is probably flat somewhat today after blowing their wad winning the big ten Tourney last weekend.
Thinking Virginia Tech may have blew their wad also and Texas might beat them but have to look at it more.
