Everybody suspected of terrorist ties, everybody on prescription medication can't buy guns. That solution doesnt work for you because you're on meds. But I'm sure you'll give the usual standard right wing answers why we can't do this. Simple and done. See that?
This is one of the dumber statements I've ever read.
This wouldn't be legal because the 5th Amendment requires, and there is extensive case law on this, that you be convicted of a crime before any of your constitutional rights are infringed.
I'm glad you're actually at the intellectual capacity where you think someone on allergy medicine shouldn't be able to buy a handgun though. That's some deep thinking there.
You make his background check not able to purchase a gun.
You wanted a solution and I gave you one. Anybody diagnosed with a mental illness or anyone suspected of terror ties.....no guns.
Its amazing that you're ok that this sick fuck could buy unlimited guns and ammo
This is all time classic liberal stupidity. Here is what you average liberal knows about firearms
CARLSON: I read the legislation and it said that it would regulate “barrel shrouds.” What’s a barrel shroud and why should we regulate that?
MCCARTHY:The guns that were chosen back in those days were basically the guns that most gangs and criminals were using to kill our police officers. I’m not saying it was the best bill, but that was they could get out at that particular time.
CARLSON: Ok. Do you know what a barrel shroud is?
MCCARTHY: I actually don’t know what a barrel shroud is. I think it’s the shoulder thing that goes up.”
It isn't legal to buy a gun when you're adjudicated mentally ill in America.
I'm glad you're in favor of something that is already the law in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
You make his background check not able to purchase a gun.
Substantive due process
A doctrine holding that the 5th and 14th Amendments require all governmental intrusions into fundamental rights and liberties be fair and reasonable and in furtherance of a legitimate governmental interest. The U.S. Supreme Court during the middle of the 20th Century used substantive due process to give added force to the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution by constraining certain actions by law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges.
^ So you want scrap this. How do you get this principle overturned from two dozen supreme court cases, for example?
Can the legislature just pass unconstitutional laws?
And let me be specific, the very first time someone is denied a gun purchase because the FBI says they are a "terror suspect" there will be lawsuits. And given the rich due process history in America, this is bedrock jurisprudence, the plaintiff is going to win.
What then?