I am personally unaware of any jurisdiction which can forcibly compel either a blood test or breath test "at the station" unless the defendant has been involved in an incident which directly harmed another person(s).
Thus, in likely 99.5% of "DUI stops", it is indeed very smart to never submit to either a field sobriety test or a breathalyzer. Without one or both of those to introduce into evidence at trial, it is very difficult for the prosecution to obtain a conviction presuming the defendant has competent legal counsel.
In the state of Texas, if the tests at the station are also refused,
the person's license is immediately suspended for 180 days for
the first offense, and 2 years for anything else:
At the station, the driver is asked to submit to a chemical test to measure his/her alcohol concentration. Usually, the individual is asked to take a breath test, although the officer may request a blood specimen. If the driver refuses to provide a specimen, or provides a specimen with a prohibited alcohol concentration, the officer serves the individual with a Notice of Suspension and confiscates the driver license.
http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/administration/driver_licensing_control/alr.htm