Yeah, and Ben Zobrist sucks, right?
What's Zorbrist got anything to do with this.
Last time I checked he's with Tampa, got nothing to do with either the Phil's or Cards, unless you are talking about Zorbist's breakout post season in 2008 where he went 0 fer the Boston series for a nice symetrical .000 batting average.
Or were you eluding to his splendid World Series against the Phils where he lit up the box scores with that 1 for 7 (.143) effort.
Zorbrist is what he is, a career .249 hitter with some pop who can swipe an occasional base.
What did you think, he was that .316 hitter he was in June?
He's more of a role player who can come off the bench and play six postions, than an everyday second baseman.
He's not geared for the 150 game grind.
Look at his game log, the more he plays, the more that average slides.
He was .316 in June, he's .286 now, and I'll wager he'll be about .274 at years end.
In the American League alone, I'd rather see Cano, Kinsler, Pedroia, Brian Roberts, and maybe even Aaron Hill with his .291 avg and 28 taters on my starting lineup at second base before Zorbrist's name.
Now, back to my original point.
Phils top to bottom have the superior lineup.
If you are trying to tell me Ryan, Lugo, Pujols, Holliday, Ludwick and Derosa collectivly are equal to or greater than Rollins, Victorino, Utley, Howard, Werth and Ibanez, then you watch way to many baseball games with red tinted sunglasses.
Cards have the fifth best ranked pitching staff in the NL, Phils seventh.
Carpenter, Wainwright, Pinero and Wellemyer as a group are not that much better as a group than Lee, Hamels, Happ and Moyer, you want to argue the Card quartet has a slight edge over the Phils front four, knock yourself out, it's not that much better.
I can't argue Lidge over Franklin, but Phils have a very nice pair of middle men in Eyre and Maddson.
Cards are not a better overall team then the Phils.