I don’t need to defend Levitt, his credentials are impeccable and he’s a Nobel laureate.
And let me remind you it was YOU that said Fauci is the “Man of the Year” so I simply started to reveal the truth of who you were “voting” for.
And your reference to Jehovah’s and the end of the world isn’t even relevant to anything I have said.
And if you believe anything I am saying implies “end of the world” in a literal sense then you clearly don’t understand anything I say.
However, if you like music at all you could certainly listen to R.E.M.’s “end of the world” to gain broader understanding.
And as you listen make sure you don’t miss this line, “team by team, reporters baffled, trump, tethered crop.”
Then ask yourself, why the hell did a band who wrote a song in 1987 add the word “trump”?
And as you ask yourself the question play the twilight zone song....
Yes or no-was D. Levitt correct or even close to what was to transpire in Israel: re his predictions?
I don't need to defend Dr. Fauci either based on his overall documented credentials no matter how much you and others try to discredit him-the
same as you with Dr. Levitt.
Imo at this juncture Dr, Fauci's credentials are at worst just as good as those of of Dr. Levitt.
"What truth" exactly are you referring to-what your sources say about him with their obvious slanted criterion and standards which talk about only
that which they care to?-again the point is that he is not perfect, nor is Dr. Fauci..
For me the manner in which you and your "unbiased" sources present the "truth" remind me of the manner/"truth"
in which Phil Steele/NC present themselves(and lots of other sports services for that matter)-in short not in a fair and balanced manner.
The similarity as I see it is NC/Phil Steele,(who/which I have documented over the last four years with
undeniable FACTS based on their ACTUAL BIG TIME LOSING over the last four years,)
I have reported their REAL record each and every week as well s cumulatively for the season as well
how Ron(the comp. man for the most part) has presented it as well as commenting on their misleading, slick
and deceptive advertising, which is based upon their selective and misleading record keeping.
Along the same lines imo you call what you say "facts, which are based on hearsay, non sequiturs reasoning, poisoning the well,
questionable circumstantial evidence, drawing unproven conclusions from YOUR SELECTIVE SOURCES, and like Phil Steele/NC simply
state that which and ONLY what fits your agenda to make your case.
To the point, re; this comparison, how can you say with certainty that folks like Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, etc are evil and that folks like
Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gupta, Dr. Birx, etc. along the same lines have some kind of agenda and are simply contributing to as you call it a "narrative?"
It is your right of course to say and believe as you wish-the same for me.
However for me the operating words are "OPINION ONLY" until PROVEN otherwise, which again you have stated to be Easter.
Also I disagree with what you said about Jehovas Witnesses being irrelevant.
For me there is a strong similarity as it applied to me in that as a kid back in the fifties about their assertions that the End of the World being
imminent and saying the same thing today roughly 70 years later.
As it applies to you, you clearly stated that everything you will say will occur re: your conspiracy theories and the wonderful New Age will begin by Easter.
Thus if your predictions don't come true by Easter, I see the word "accountability" being the operative word as it applies to you.
I am not sure what you mean by REM as it applies here-I am not all that familiar with their music but will play the song it later on youtube if I can find it.
Thus at this point I have no idea why the word "'trump" was added in any event and probably won't after listening to the song.
That said, I don't quite understand why you singled out one song from them.
I and you could cite a zillion songs over the years with both clear meanings and ones not so clear.
However imo to try to use a given word in any kind of song and to draw inferences from it such as the word in this case "trump" is interesting
but doesn't mean anything until the meaning of it is proven-in this case using the word "Trump," nothing has been PROVEN one way or the other
YET, meaning at this particular juncture one's interpretation of the meaning doesn't mean anything.
Also and pardon my ignorance but back in the 80's or whenever the song was written, did song did anyone in the group state
what they meant by the use of the word Trump-that is what matters rather than drawing conclusions or making inferences many years later?
In any case it proves nothing until/if/when your scenario, which we all know plays out by Easter.
Back to your post, I have played the Twilight Zone tune many times and thus the lead-in music as I watched the show, and in fact went on a binge
about a year or so and watched every single of the original episodes I hasn't watched previously back in the fifties and early sixties as well
as the ones I had forgotten-it was quite enjoyable.
It was by far my favorite tv show back then.