Fishhead said:
I know they have runners, thats why i called him a clown because pro gamblers dont really visit all books.
You also have got to be some retarded guy. What in the fvcking world did you think i meant when i called him a clown for stating that pro gamblers dont visit all books?
hno:
Iceman said:
those lines you posted were widely available at many books. You were not the beneficiary of lines that were unposted at other books.
And most importantly could you please post which of those lines actually fall in the number...Because its all relatively useless if you end up not even needing the line in the first place.
foreignlegion said:
well it's official. You honestly don't know what the hell you are talking about. WHEN YOU TRY TO MIDDLE A GAME YOU SURE AND THE HELL WOULDN'T BET LIKE YOU ASSUMED. That would be a polish middle. Instead of criticsizing everyone and everything maybe you should read up on a few things before you try and stir up the pot. I lost the juice. I won the +10 and lost the -7 meaning I lost the juice, which is .10 of a unit. All I can say is WOW. I actually gave you more credit than this.
Please respond to this or are you going to avoid this like every time else you have been confronted. This is too funny. I rest my case.
Okay timeout. It's one thing if you have a team of people you trust. I mean, willing to die for type stuff. But in most cases, I have seen, the runners so you speak of, place the bet while the man who gave him or her the money sits 20 feet from him in the sportsbook where he chose the best number at.
But thats all there is to it, a miscalculation on my part.
Fact is you didnt post what book you got this line at, you posted this in the middle of the night when no one could verify that we couldnt find the lines you got at other books.
i am calculated the figures wrong, but that doesnt make your argument right.
until you post lines that we can verify the hawaii game is still a lie in my book
not to mention that even with my miscalculation you still lost juice, You didnt benefit from the mythical advantage of having these unverified lines.
your example still proves you wrong. my miscalculation is only of the amounts you lost
Fact is you didnt post what book you got this line at, you posted this in the middle of the night when no one could verify that we couldnt find the lines you got at other books.
i am calculated the figures wrong, but that doesnt make your argument right.
until you post lines that we can verify the hawaii game is still a lie in my book
not to mention that even with my miscalculation you still lost juice, You didnt benefit from the mythical advantage of having these unverified lines.
your example still proves you wrong. my miscalculation is only of the amounts you lost
Iceman said:
There have been a ton of questions asked of me by posters?
what question have i avoided?
Am i the one one who failed to post the lines i falsely claim to have got along with the books then turning around and claiming this bogus crap?
The onus is on you bro not me. I am the one demanding you prove the your point. And thus far you have failed miserably.
If i am wrong and you are right then simply post the number, the book you got it at and lets check the result at the end of the day to find out if you there is any sense in what you claim.
its very simple really...
foreignlegion said:
I could answer anthing you would like (like I always do) but it is COMPLETLY obvious you would end up lost, which I already told you if you read it earlier it was at the Greek and Cris. The reason they were so good because the Greek is generally the first to post halftime lines and I knew and use a few other sources of information to realize the line was going up and quickly, I waited and bough back at the book that I know ususally moves late in halftimes (Cris). For you to even think that I could lose (and would actually bet it ) a unit on this type of bet explains everything I need to know.
Instead of having such an attitude to everyone on here why don't you try and learn somethings. It couldn't hurt. No one is trying to sell you anything and it may actually help you in the long run.
Go back read the whole thread and hopefully this ends up being useful for you. I am not going to get in a 3rd grade argument with someone that doesn't even understand the math behind it. I don't care if I lose 100 bets in a row, I am looking at the math behind it. Good luck at this and I really mean it.
foreignlegion said:Are you friggin kidding me? 10 accounts? What brand of crack are you smoking? Actually saying something that dumb really means you are a small time player pretending to be some big time player. There is no serious gambler who would consider depositing various amounts in 10 books especially with the upheaval in the gambling industry right now
:nohead:
Assuming such upheavel is true, then doesn't it make sense to have MORE accounts and NOT FEWER? Doesn't it make more sense to diversify your $ among more accounts instead of having more eggs in each basket so that if one book stiffs you you'll have less $ lost at that book?
Variety is the spice of life. And offshore sportsbooks.
What could have been a useful and educational thread has turned into a pissing match.
Iceman, you have some excellent posts in here but got off track and into a flaming war. Be above it, as you lend some very useful information for those aspiring middlers.
Legion, state your case and provide evidence. I'm sure you can lend some insight as well.
We try and stay above the fray, but now egos get involved.
Once again, educational and informative debate is productive; rhetoric and dick-waving is counter-productive.
Iceman, you have some excellent posts in here but got off track and into a flaming war. Be above it, as you lend some very useful information for those aspiring middlers.
Legion, state your case and provide evidence. I'm sure you can lend some insight as well.
We try and stay above the fray, but now egos get involved.
Once again, educational and informative debate is productive; rhetoric and dick-waving is counter-productive.
