How Are They Going To Force Sterling To Sell??

[akphidelt]

I would say "selling" with my boys not "sold" until I had money but that's just me. If you say "sold" when it wasn't then the deal falls through, your boys think you look like a douche bag.

This is such a semantically driven argument it is ridiculous.

 

[vitterd]

Hey I tried to keep it about Sterling, but whatever I say, this Acebb guy will take the argument in some ridiculous direction. I'm an informal debater and don't take things so literally. I'm looking to argue about the Sterling situation, I don't care if you say the word sold when it might technically be "pending" or something. Just ridiculous.

Yep...acebb always pulls that "except i never said that" bullshit. Does that with everybody. Guy is scary mental

 

[Enfuego]

This is such a semantically driven argument it is ridiculous.

True statement

 

[akphidelt]

Yep...acebb always pulls that "except i never said that" bullshit. Does that with everybody. Guy is scary mental

He's a really weird dude.

 

[akphidelt]

Latest update:

Tuesday's NBA owners meeting, in which a vote to oust Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling was set to take place in New York City, may not happen after all.


According to sources, if Sterling presents the NBA with a completed agreement to sell the Clippers before Tuesday's meeting, and if the NBA has a "favorable impression" of both the dollar amount and the incoming owners, the league would postpone the hearing until it can formally vet the purchase, sale agreement and pending owners. If the NBA later approves the transaction, the Clippers would be sold and Sterling, along with his wife and co-owner, Shelly Sterling, would no longer have any affiliation with the NBA.

Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nb...clippers-sale-meeting-wife-nba/#ixzz338V3VvSz
​

 

[StevieRay]

That damn Steven A Smith a liar to. He said no way team sells by then

 

[Dafinch]

Hey Idiot.

I never said those things.

I already responded to your stupid drivel by pointing out you can't read.

You semi-illiterate, brain dead cocksucker, where did I SAY that you said "those things." however it is very clear that you won't concede them. and you did not respond to anything, showing you are a steaming, lying sack of shit.

 

[akphidelt]

Oh well. The Clippers won't be sold by June 3rd and this dope is here boasting about being "right" by ignoring the statements of the lawyer for the owner of the team.

People with "real world Knowledge!" (who even writes they have "real world knowledge" anyway?) do that sort of thing all the time.

Lmfao!!! News reports coming in that the Clippers and Steve Ballmer have agreed on a purchase price of $2 billion.

 

[akphidelt]

The resident legal expert has convinced himself that the lawyer is telling Sterling to sell.

Why?

Well, because. That's why.

Bidders were also trying to make sense of statements from Sterling’s lawyer late Tuesday. Blecher said that despite Sterling’s letter to the NBA, he would not support his wife’s sale of the team and planned to stage a prolonged fight to maintain ownership. Two bidders said they still believed the sale would go ahead.

Shelly Sterling’s advisors have told bidders they expect to announce a winner expeditiously, though they did not specify a time for their decision.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-clippers-sale-bidders-20140528-story.html

Totally over by June 3!

Sold by June 3!

Really?

The NBA released a statement saying its advisory and finance committee met via conference call Wednesday, plans to review all documents and still intends to vote Tuesday on the matter.

So if the team is going to be sold before June 3, why are they voting again?

You are so comically dumb you can't even read and comprehend your own links.

Except you are not "correct" since Sterling's lawyer has said he isn't selling and the NBA is still voting to take away Sterling's ownership on June 3 despite the team being for sale.

But hey, what's another lie on the pile, right? I mean, you actually posted on this forum that you were "banned" which was a complete lie, so why stop now?

Note this is "right"!

Shelly Sterling, who has been given authority to sell the team by husband Donald Sterling, and her advisers will vet and separate the strongest bids over the next few days with the goal of completing what one source described as "an accelerated process" by Monday.

But this is "not right"

"I don't know what agreement she has with him, but I'm saying to you today, he disavows anything she's doing to sell the team," Blecher said. "He says, 'It's my team, and I'll sell it when and if I get around to it.'"

Why?

Well, just because.

Oh, wait. Someone who has never sold a business, gone to law school, or negotiated any sort of business deal (not to mention has never had a real job) say so.

Never mind.

Shelly Sterling is agreeing to sell 100 percent of the team, according to sources, an important condition for the NBA.

The fact that you think this was worth highlighting is quite funny.

You actually believe it supports anything you've said.

Oh well. The Clippers won't be sold by June 3rd and this dope is here boasting about being "right" by ignoring the statements of the lawyer for the owner of the team.

People with "real world Knowledge!" (who even writes they have "real world knowledge" anyway?) do that sort of thing all the time.

Notice how this comically dumb response simply does not address the issue of how this silly little kid ignores facts that prevent the silly kid from being "right"

Gee, I wonder why he did that?

LMAO!!! The comedy gold from just this one clown alone is too much for one man to handle. Just to hilarious. Now he will argue what he meant was that the paperwork would not be signed and it wouldn't be official by June 3rd, when we all know he didn't think a deal would be made by then. Classic liar strategy, hahahahahahahaha!! Poor guy, can't expect much from someone who doesn't know what liquidate means.

 

[Enfuego]

Lmfao!!! News reports coming in that the Clippers and Steve Ballmer have agreed on a purchase price of $2 billion.

There's a giant difference between two parties agreeing on a purchase price and a guy submitting a bid don't you think? Guy has submitted a bid only. No agreement on anything.

 

[bigtendominator]

I went back thru the first 200 posts. The only person who proved you right was Enfuego. Patsfan, myself and several others all stated if he chooses to fight. Enfuego stated that under no circumstances will he sell the team or be out before the start of next season. The rest stated, it all depends on if he chooses to fight.

The entire 46 page thread was retarded, everyone basically, yourself included argued based on the assertion that Sterling would challenge the sale. At this point it remains up in the air, as to whether he challenges the Ballmer purchase.

 

[akphidelt]

Funny how even journalists use the phrase "sold" when an agreement has been reached. But apparently Acebb once again has his own understanding of words that no one else understands, lol. You better go teach them Acebb's language, apparently they don't know English either, hahahahaha

[h=1]Donald Sterling’s LA Clippers sold for $2 billion to former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer: report[/h]http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/sold-sterling-clippers-bought-2-billion-microsoft-ceo-article-1.1810693

 

[bigtendominator]

Funny how even journalists use the phrase "sold" when an agreement has been reached. But apparently Acebb once again has his own understanding of words that no one else understands, lol. You better go teach them Acebb's language, apparently they don't know English either, hahahahaha

Donald Sterling’s LA Clippers sold for $2 billion to former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer: report

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/b...ght-2-billion-microsoft-ceo-article-1.1810693

Not defending him, but they shouldn't use the word Sold. They should have said tentative agreement reached.

So many times, a deal is reached and for one reason or another it falls apart. In this case funding isn't an issue, but in most transactions, they are contingent on loan approval and various other factors (real estate), inspection being passed appraisal, credit, etc.

For example would you say DirecTV has been sold to AT&T? I would say a tentative agreement has been reached, with Congressional approval.

 

[loomis41973]

There's a giant difference between two parties agreeing on a purchase price and a guy submitting a bid don't you think? Guy has submitted a bid only. No agreement on anything.

+

 

[akphidelt]

Not defending him, but they shouldn't use the word Sold. They should have said tentative agreement reached.

There is not a single part of me that is surprised you think that.

 

[akphidelt]

I went back thru the first 200 posts. The only person who proved you right was Enfuego. Patsfan, myself and several others all stated if he chooses to fight. Enfuego stated that under no circumstances will he sell the team or be out before the start of next season. The rest stated, it all depends on if he chooses to fight.

The entire 46 page thread was retarded, everyone basically, yourself included argued based on the assertion that Sterling would challenge the sale. At this point it remains up in the air, as to whether he challenges the Ballmer purchase.

This is only one thread. There were many in other threads that called me an idiot for thinking this would be finished quickly, he would not fight it, and he would not be owner by next season.

 

[bigtendominator]

There is not a single part of me that is surprised you think that.

You really think you are lot smarter than you are. How many different financial transactions have you been in where you have bought and sold items over $100k?

 

[loomis41973]

You really think you are lot smarter than you are. How many different financial transactions have you been in where you have bought and sold items over $1K

Fixed it for ya...

 

[akphidelt]

You really think you are lot smarter than you are. How many different financial transactions have you been in where you have bought and sold items over $100k?

My personal life has nothing to do with this conversation. Don't worry about me man. I just pointed out that I'm not the only one who thinks using the word sold when two people reach an agreement is acceptable. And considering the fact you guys are very retarded and would never be accepted for a journalist position, I'm pretty sure they understand the ability to use sold far more than you guys. Like I said, I'm usually right. If I'm wrong I'll admit it but that rarely happens.

 

[Enfuego]

I went back thru the first 200 posts. The only person who proved you right was Enfuego. Patsfan, myself and several others all stated if he chooses to fight. Enfuego stated that under no circumstances will he sell the team or be out before the start of next season. The rest stated, it all depends on if he chooses to fight.

The entire 46 page thread was retarded, everyone basically, yourself included argued based on the assertion that Sterling would challenge the sale. At this point it remains up in the air, as to whether he challenges the Ballmer purchase.

Huh? A) he is not selling and b) I said he wouldn't be out under his own accord.