All I'm saying is his actions to fight the forced sale of the team could negatively impact the value of his team. And that is something the lawyers will tell him. Unless they honestly think they can win a court battle (which I don't think they have a chance), why would he even attempt it? And if he wins the court battle? That would completely destroy the value of his team as the league (in my opinion) would refuse to play for him.
And the NBA Constitution is meant to make this quick. The second they press the charges on Sterling, it's a 20 day process until it's finalized.
I still think he will be advised to sell, make his money, and bounce. I just don't see what he can sue on other than the Constitution he signed being illegal or antitrust claims, which he doesn't have.
This $2.5 million deal is from the Commissioner. Whether that $2.5 million is legit or not I have no clue. Been talking about the forced sale the entire time. The fact they act like they won this argument because he refuses to pay the $2.5 million fine Silver levied on him is hilarious.
Probably to discuss what his options are. Silver gave him that $2.5 million fine. Maybe he is going to fight that Silver doesn't have that much power to fine him. I have no clue. The argument was never about this $2.5 million fine.
The argument is about what he will do if the owners vote him out according to their Constitution.
Once again, really not that hard to grasp.
No doubt, Sterling has been all over the map. I, personally, think it's impossible to know what he does. His interview was beyond strange. I am still not sure if that "why would I fight this"/apology to the owners was sincere or his attempt to kiss the owners asses, in hopes that they would let him stick around. His lack of an apology leads me to believe he just doesn't give a damn at all. That attitude leads me to believe he would at least attempt to drag this out in the courts (most likely unsuccessfully).
