The retard crew can't seem to grasp reality. Does Silver have the right to fine Sterling $2.5 million according to the Constitution? I have no clue, because I don't care.
Do owners have the right to be judge and jury and force another member to sell according to the Constitution? Yes, it is written out plain as can be. Will Sterling fight the owners, I highly doubt it. If he does, he will surely lose a quick battle in the courts.
The only caveat here which I have mentioned from the beginning deals with his wife and family and what happens if he steps down as owner. Regardless, he will not be owner of the Clippers come next season.
Do owners have the right to be judge and jury and force another member to sell according to the Constitution? Yes, it is written out plain as can be. Will Sterling fight the owners, I highly doubt it. If he does, he will surely lose a quick battle in the courts.
The only caveat here which I have mentioned from the beginning deals with his wife and family and what happens if he steps down as owner. Regardless, he will not be owner of the Clippers come next season.
Oh really? Because you said:
Note: this came out the day after Silver's announcement Donald Sterling Will Sue The NBA If Forced To Sell The Clippers
Read more at: http://nesn.com/2014/04/report-donald-sterling-will-sue-the-nba-if-forced-to-sell-the-clippers/
And to top that off, Sterling's lawyer has already told the NBA's counsel that Sterling intends to sue regarding the forced sale of the team and outlined the issues that Sterling intents to raise in litigating the matter. This has already happened.
Can't wait to see you admit you're all wrong and stuff.
Lmao! That was an article from 17 days ago from an anonymous source. Since then, Sterling himself has said he sue the owners. You are really dumb if you believe everything you read on the Internet. The first this issue came out every single article was talking about him suing and fighting, when he had said absolutely nothing, lol. Then the NBA Constitution came out and less and less people are saying that now as the Constitution lays it out very clearly in how the owners can force him to sell and there is nothing he can do about it.
Originally Posted by akphidelt
I'm rarely wrong about real world activities.
@)
Originally Posted by akphidelt
Yea, and his lawyers will tell him if you fight you will lose, your best option is to sell.
ointer:
You have no self awareness
The owners haven't voted yet. And laughing emoticons is a sign of serious desperation. Probably over compensating for your lack of understanding of basic financial concepts like liquidate or bonds.
"We aren't there yet so why should I address that issue? I don't want to fight with my partners," he said. "We all do what we have to do. I love them and I respect them. Whatever their decision is with regard to my terrible words, then I have to do it, I think."
- Sterlings words....
"We reject your demand for payment," the letter tells Buchanan, who on May 14 informed Sterling by letter that he must pay the $2.5 million fine.
Blecher's letter goes on to identify two basic legal defenses for Sterling.
First, Blecher claims that Sterling has not violated any article of the NBA constitution. The letter curiously references Article 35, which governs players' misconduct, and several other provisions. The NBA is expected to argue that Sterling violated Article 13(d) among other provisions. Article 13 (d) bars owners from violating contractual obligations, including the obligation that owners no engage in unethical conduct or take positions adverse to the NBA. Blecher does not explain how he intends to prove Sterling's racist remarks captured on the secret recording -- followed by Sterling's incendiary remarks to Anderson Cooper about Magic Johnson -- do not give rise to unethical conduct or positions adverse to the NBA.
No were in there does it say he will sue if the owners force him to sell. These are words targeted at Silver's ability to fine and ban him for life on his own.
Much different case when it comes to the owners as their role is clearly outlined in the Constitution, which Sterling signed.
You are still confusing the difference cases.
