He has an opinion. How can you argue abortion isn't child abuse. Molesting an 8th grader is terribly bad. But there has to be a difference between molesting and consensual. What is it if the 8th grader is sexual active. How about if she's had 3-4 different partners. How about if see uses sex toys on herself. The law isn't always right. Many, many times laws have changed over time. God damnit, I know there gotta to be horny 13-14 year old girls out there that are looking for love.
Please open up your mind and at least consider that it not child molestation everytime.
So if a horny 13 girl starts mastubating, humpimg her pillow, sticking a dildo up herself would you call this rape, would you call this molestation.
In Enfuego's own way he agrees to the valid points we mention. Everytime he begins his name calling, over exaggerating and straight up lies that is his way of telliing the forum we are right.
Like I said if a teenager can't consent to sex then the same logic should apply to a teenager being charged with rape. How could you hold a teenager accountable for one sex act but not the other.
Unless people think underage consensual sex should only be allowed for teenage boys. Then who are these boys supposed to fuck older women? Those that think its cool for a teenage boy to fuck an older woman but its molestation and rape if a teenage girl fucks an older man because girls are too stupid, naive and precious to have sex then that as sexist. We might as well strip women their right to play sports, vote, and work. In fact since America is going to choose to over protect their daughters then we might as well bring back the chastity belts and start arranging their marriages. I guess since we send our labor to India we might as well adopt their customs in the process.
No, all of the scenarios were "legal", so they would NOT go to jail. Did you not read that word, or do you need reading glasses? Maybe try looking again with the morning sand cleaned out of your eyes. I'll capitalize it this time so it's easy for you to spot:
3] Men in Spain have a "choice" to LEGALLY bang a 13 year old teen girl. "It's as simple as that."
3] Twenty-five year old men in Colorado have a LEGAL "choice" to have sex with 15 year old school girls. "It's as simple as that."
3] Nineteen year old adults in Hawaii and Canada have a LEGAL "choice" to screw 14 year old teenie boppers. "It's as simple as that."
3] Eighteen year old guys in the US Capitol [Washington] have a LEGAL "choice" to hump 14 year old young ladies. "It's as simple as that."
Both abortion [killing a preborn child] and molestation are abusive. Here's some pics for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetus
Troll? What is that supposed to mean in this context? I thought we were talking about consentual fucking? BTW, if you think we believe it is generally ok for the average 19 year old to screw the average 13 year old, i think you've been listening too much to 'special sauce' boy, and are due for another rude awakening. But, by all means, carry on, for our amusement.
@)
Really? And you think the 19 year old is miles ahead of the 13 year old? What if the 19 year old is a retard and the 13 YO is in university?
Because an embryo is not a child.
Sex toys on herself? How do we go from you three bafoons trolling the Jr. High parking lot looking for a kid to screw to a girl using a vibrator on herself? What do those two things have to do with one another? Very strange.
"Open up your mind Enfuego, I can't have sex with a woman so I'd like the next best thing. What's wrong with that?"
Sorry I am not on here every second of every day to reply to you. I thought she since she deals with mentally ill people for a living she would be interested in the excuses you were coming up with as why it is acceptable for a 19 year old to have sex with a 13 year old. The sex of the 13 year old does not matter male or female the 19 year old is the rapist.
I find it humorous to try and degrade me by saying she wears the pants since obviously you have not clue what I do and are just jealous I have a wife who brings in more in a year than you do in probably 10.
As for putting words in my mouth and saying I am infatuated with Sandusky and raping of little boys all I was saying is that the original topic of assuming guiltwith him and everything that's availible for the public to pre judge him is an interesting debate. We all know your on his side
Oh and if you ever came to my state and were arrested for underage sex violations don't worry I won't represent you
Sorry I am not on here every second of every day to reply to you. I thought she since she deals with mentally ill people for a living she would be interested in the excuses you were coming up with as why it is acceptable for a 19 year old to have sex with a 13 year old. The sex of the 13 year old does not matter male or female the 19 year old is the rapist.
I find it humorous to try and degrade me by saying she wears the pants since obviously you have not clue what I do and are just jealous I have a wife who brings in more in a year than you do in probably 10.
As for putting words in my mouth and saying I am infatuated with Sandusky and raping of little boys all I was saying is that the original topic of assuming guiltwith him and everything that's availible for the public to pre judge him is an interesting debate. We all know your on his side
Oh and if you ever came to my state and were arrested for underage sex violations don't worry I won't represent you
I am sure your wife is a real handful around others psycho analyzing everybody and preaching that everybody has issues. You two must be quite the tag team though you defend the murderers and your wife finds them clinically insane. Nice racket you must have there.
Speaking of income. I earn a very good living and my profession is very relaxing. I don't need to chase ambulances or sneak around the looney bins looking for clients to pay back student loans from 10 years ago.
The reason why the Sandusky's get away with raping your preadolescence sons for decades is because you are too occupied trying to fight the inevitable keeping your teenage daughters hymens in tact. When in reality your teenage daughters have already been fingered by every teenage boy within a 3 mile radius and have already moved on to sneaking out at night to go fuck college kids cause they can last longer than 3 pumps. But don't worry she still creeps back home by dawn with broken pieces of condoms in her twat and her teeth surprisingly white. But as long as your daughters keep lying about being a virgin you will continue to give them an allowance so they can buy those slutty clothes and make up to attract the guys that they can't get enough of.
BTW isn't it in your state of Tennessee where a successful date is one that involves a fifth of Jack Daniels, a raggedy primer colored truck and a sister or first cousin. Your states motto is "If she ain't good enough for family, then she ain't good enough for anybody else."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_%281996_film%29
Older dudes and underage girls was just about as standard as one can get up until the year 2000.
Just because in today's society the weak minded have been conditioned to cover their eyes at the sight of a pretty teenager doesn't mean we should go back in time and condemn and judge those that lived their lives to what was acceptable in their times. Maybe we should go back and judge our parents who in the 50's smoked and drank in the office. How inconsiderate of them for passing second hand smoke onto their coworkers or telling their secretaries to put out or find another job when under the influence. How dare our parents for feeding us sugars and carbs and deep frying our foods when we were growing up. They should have known that in the future that kind of diet would be frowned upon and considered unhealthy.
Maybe we should go back and retroactively charge all of those people before 1980 who used to drink and drive and may or may not have injured somebody due to their driving intoxicated. The law wasn't really enforced prior to 1980 until the MADD organization was formed. But who cares it was against the law then albeit not enforced as stiff as it is today.
We should also go back and charge all of those people who treated all of the black people in this country like shit and denied them access to equal rights because in today's society if you do that you are considered racist and if you do something publicly it is considered a hate crime. After all technically it was against the law back then to spit or beat on someone regardless of the color of their skin or trespass and vandalize a persons house by burning a cross on their lawn or chucking a brick through their windows even though it is an act of hatred and violence.
Older dudes and underage girls was just about as standard as one can get up until the year 2000.
Just because in today's society the weak minded have been conditioned to cover their eyes at the sight of a pretty teenager doesn't mean we should go back in time and condemn and judge those that lived their lives to what was acceptable in their times. Maybe we should go back and judge our parents who in the 50's smoked and drank in the office. How inconsiderate of them for passing second hand smoke onto their coworkers or telling their secretaries to put out or find another job when under the influence. How dare our parents for feeding us sugars and carbs and deep frying our foods when we were growing up. They should have known that in the future that kind of diet would be frowned upon and considered unhealthy.
Maybe we should go back and retroactively charge all of those people before 1980 who used to drink and drive and may or may not have injured somebody due to their driving intoxicated. The law wasn't really enforced prior to 1980 until the MADD organization was formed. But who cares it was against the law then albeit not enforced as stiff as it is today.
We should also go back and charge all of those people who treated all of the black people in this country like shit and denied them access to equal rights because in today's society if you do that you are considered racist and if you do something publicly it is considered a hate crime. After all technically it was against the law back then to spit or beat on someone regardless of the color of their skin or trespass and vandalize a persons house by burning a cross on their lawn or chucking a brick through their windows even though it is an act of hatred and violence.
Where did you get that from, the tooth fairy? The same source that informed you earlier in this thread that the Rubber Room [RR] is the least popular forum on the Rx? I'm thinking if you can offer your guess work on the sports forums, there's a lot of guys looking for good fades.
A few years ago the RR was voted by Rx members as the favorite forum here. This poll took place in the Offshore forum, not in the RR. In the last few days everytime i've checked the RR was in the top 4-6 for the number of views out of 37 forums. And that during the seasons of NFL, CFB, AND CBB.
Sure, just like the Indianapolis Colts are probably going to win the next Super Bowl.
If the tooth fairy talks to you again be sure to ask her her thoughts on how many pedos and rapists are on this list:
In reply to the above quote by CoachCB, WC said:
A response to Enfuego:
I have to disagree with you on this one Chris. He gets worked up in several threads, not just this one. Then when the majority in the thread disagree with him he just spouts his opinion and takes it for fact and calls his opponent the angry one.
@)
As far as sumday being a felon, rapist and pedophile, the legal age of consent in Canada is 14 when he had sex with the girl. So having sex with a 15 year old makes him neither a rapist nor a felon.
Hell, for most of the world's history 21 year old guys and older have been having sex with 15 year olds. It's only been recently that it's been frowned upon and mostly only in the US. The Latin countries certainly don't frown upon and most of Europe and Asia don't either. Certainly the lawmakers in the whole country of Canada didn't think it was bad either. Otherwise they wouldn't have made the age of consent 14.
As far as him being a pedophile, in order to be a pedophile one has to be sexually interested in prepubescent children. A 15 year-old doesn't hardly fit that description.
0-3 for our friend Enfuego. Or perhaps 0-4 if you include all the people who disagreed with you that rich people get favors from law enforcement when you said they don't.
"An adult or late teenager who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children."
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pedophile
Such utter rubbish.
Where is there one iota of evidence to indicate that any of the three aforementioned posters have a sexual interest "in prepubescent children".
Now all of the 4 guys on your team have lost credibility. You're a joke.
You just keep getting dumber by the post.
1) Cover our eyes at pretty teenagers? Who in their right mind looks at a 13-year-old 8th grader and can even imagine she's pretty? I know who does, a pedophile named Hosmolestor.
2) Smoking and drinking in an office is not the same as trolling the junior high parking lot for a 13-year-old. Again, not even close to being the same thing but in your world, they are the same.
3) Eating sugar and carbohydrates equals having sex with a 13-year-old girl? Again, carry on.
4) Drinking and driving is the same thing as hanging out in the junior high parking lot looking for an 8th grader? Again, whatever you say.
5) Racism=child molestation of a 13-year-old? Ok, you got me.
How does it feel to look in the mirror this Thanksgiving and know you're a child molestor? To know you had sex with a child in junior high. I bet that feels nice. Enjoy your turkey Chester.
Boonton 19-year-old man accused of having sex with missing 13-year-old girl
BOONTON — A 19-year-old Boonton man was arrested today on charges he had sexual relations with a 13-year-old girl who had been reported missing, according to the Morris County Prosecutor’s Office.
Abdallah Sahili was charged with two counts of sexual assault, statutory; and two counts of child endangerment, according to Capt. Jeffrey Paul, a spokesman for Prosecutor Robert Bianchi.
Superior Court Judge Stuart Minkowitz, sitting in Morristown, set Sahili's bail at $75,000, with no 10 percent option. Sahili is being held at the Morris County jail, Paul said.
The girl told Boonton police that she missed school on Tuesday and took a taxi to Sahili’s home at his request, according to an affidavit signed by Boonton police Detective Sgt. Christian Trowbridge. The girl said she had consensual sex with Sahili and later said she had also engaged in sexual intercourse with him a month-and-half ago, Trowbridge said.
The girl’s disappearance was reported to Morris County Prosecutor’s Office Missing Person Unit at 12:55 a.m. today, and the girl was later found at Sahili’s home, according to the affidavit.
BOONTON — A 19-year-old Boonton man was arrested today on charges he had sexual relations with a 13-year-old girl who had been reported missing, according to the Morris County Prosecutor’s Office.
Abdallah Sahili was charged with two counts of sexual assault, statutory; and two counts of child endangerment, according to Capt. Jeffrey Paul, a spokesman for Prosecutor Robert Bianchi.
Superior Court Judge Stuart Minkowitz, sitting in Morristown, set Sahili's bail at $75,000, with no 10 percent option. Sahili is being held at the Morris County jail, Paul said.
The girl told Boonton police that she missed school on Tuesday and took a taxi to Sahili’s home at his request, according to an affidavit signed by Boonton police Detective Sgt. Christian Trowbridge. The girl said she had consensual sex with Sahili and later said she had also engaged in sexual intercourse with him a month-and-half ago, Trowbridge said.
The girl’s disappearance was reported to Morris County Prosecutor’s Office Missing Person Unit at 12:55 a.m. today, and the girl was later found at Sahili’s home, according to the affidavit.
