View Poll Results: is hosnatcher a rapist?
Looks like Zeeman and X-files voted.
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=816280&page=2
- yes
27 90.00% - no
3 10.00%
Looks like Zeeman and X-files voted.
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=816280&page=2
all talk hosnatcher isnt getting any tail so he might as well not get 13 year old felony tail......all bullshit hes too dumb not to be in jail
x-files has a thread in the RR about things in his ass(nuff said)
zeeman its too dumb to have a real avatar..uses the the generic rx clown
so these are the three guys you are arguing with a virgin idiot who dreams of 6th graders a guy who sticks bananas in his ass and a guy too dumb to have an avatar
carry on
Are you the one to do it. Mr. internet tough guy? Are you one of those Computer Bangers or E-Thugs who talks mass shit online but in person you run at the sight of a minority.
I picture you as one of those wannabe authority fucks who probably are involved in your Neighbor Associations group and you patrol the neighborhood threating to report and fine people for having an overgrown tree or leave their Christmas lights on after the New Year. You probably put notes on peoples car who park on the street overnight and call the tow truck. Your neighbors must hate your fuckin ass and either your family doesn't get a holiday fruit cake or if you do get one the neighbor who gave it to you spit and rubbed boogers in it.
I bet your local police station sees you walk up and say to themselves here comes that puny asshole coming to file a complaint again. Then when the greet you they ask what is wrong today, is it something your neighbor did or something you read online and you want to report an out of state crime.
I am sure your kid is ashamed of your ass and hates your guts. You can look forward to your kid either becoming a drunk or junkie and possibly even becoming a faggot since you probably outlaw him from seeing girls.
Your life has got to be royally fucked up and utterly worthless for you to care so much about the activities of the individuals you encounter online.
steak tartar
powdered milkman
Join DateAug 2006LocationNW MINNESOTAPosts21,689
This tells me all I need to know about you. 21k posts in 5 years and you don't even get paid from the RX? The internet is your life. No pussy, no money and no social skills. You live your life online and you just want to be judged by your avatar.
powdered milkman
This tells me all I need to know about you. 21k posts in 5 years and you don't even get paid from the RX? The internet is your life. No pussy, no money and no social skills. You live your life online and you just want to be judged by your avatar.
Consensual sex = rape? Oh my.
My main valid point I made is don't judge people.
And for you Texasfan, thanks for pointing out that aquittal doesn't mean not guilty. Please try and focus and understand what I wrote. I'll repeat what I've stated a couple of times. If Michael Jackson was banging boys, it would be easy to prove. He had his day in court and was aquitted.
Now it seems to me you interpet the meaning of this statement as aquittal being synomus with not guilty. Read the statement again, open up that tiny weeny closed mind of yours. I'll give you second chance to understand I never said aquittal is the same as not guilty. Focus!
Barman,
Please check my post for spelling errors! Thank You
No Barman,
What we're trying to say is try and think outside of the box. What we're trying to say is consensual sex doesn't = rape. What we're trying to say is stop judging people. What we're trying to say is most judges are hippocrits.
Judge and scholar Barman, please check my spelling. Thank you!
I know one thing to be fact. If you ever got into a dust up with me, you'd lose and that's a fact. I haven't been in a fight in 17 years but if we ever fought, I'd win and you can bank that one.
That said, you can talk all the mess you want and one thing is for certain. You are a child molestor and a rapist and I am not. You have to live with that the rest of your life and I do not. You have to go to bed at night knowing you have taken advantage of kids and I have not. You are every father's worst nightmare.
Now, go do your speed and eat a grenade.
Enfuego,
Your a father and most father's have to protect their children. If you didn't take this stance you and people that JUDGE you would consider you a bad father. But try and think outside the box, open up that conservative mind. You're not the father of every teen girl in America. Everybody is different. The laws are made by mostly male, hippicritical men who have daughters, similar to your demographic. Please stop trying to argue that consensual sex is rape. The best way to answer this question is to survey adult female's that took part in consensual sexual intercourse during their early teen years. Believe me, this is a very large pool. Now if the results of this survey support your beliefs it will definitely make me rethink my beliefs.
Zeeman, I'm going to clue you in, and I want you to pay attention very carefully.
By definition of the law, a person who falls under the statutory rape statute
cannot legally give consent. For the same reason a mentally disabled person
cannot legally give consent. The law deems them unable to give consent.
So, even though in your pedophile mind, you think the 13 year old who is fucking
the 19 year old is giving consent, the law says it is impossible.
Did you understand that? If not, please read it again until it sinks into your
sick skull.
Dumbass,
I'm not arguing the definition of the law. Were arguing that the law is ancient, shouldn't apply to every instance, was drafted and implemented by a hippicritical group of questionable male politicians. I'm arguing that not every instance of consensual sex of teens or penatration of a young teenage girl is rape. This a fact! Wise up boy and realize your the one who needs a clue. This whole argument hasn't been about the definition of the law. We all know the definition. The argument is if it a good law.
Here's a scenario for you and all your cohorts, I hope this helps you understand my argument.
It's already been pointed out to transfer money oversees to offshore sports books is by definition of the law a crime. I guess in your eyes anybody who has transferred money to an offshore sports book is a sick criminal gambler. Doesn't matter how may times a person has transferred money being once or many this person must be a sick criminal. That's the definition of the law, no room to interpet differently, right. right. Your probably a sick criminal gambler. I've sent money offshore once or twice over the years. I guess you think I'm a sick criminal gambler. I'd argue I'm not.
Barman, please do your job!
Which just goes to our point that just because a law says sex with an underage is not legal or ok does not mean that that is always the case. Many states even make exceptions where it is ok. Or like was posted re Canada, where it was implied that it's legal, for example, for a 14 year old and a 19 year old to have sexual relations. BTW, in the case at issue, the 13 year old the 19 YO was banging was only around 2-3 months shy of 14. Thanks for agreeing with our comments re the legal system!
While we're speaking about your attitude re the law, it was you who posted the following. Is this guy, Helmut Seifert, your hero or just your role model?
Talking about "sick fucks", we finally have a real example of one. And you appear to sympathize with him and share his foolish rage.
Mr Tarter it is you and your boys Enfuego, Festering and that chick Barman that keeps hijacking any and every thread you can and bring this topic up again and again. If I am in a thread discussing what good shows on TV these days and I mention a few shows. Here comes Enfuego saying some dumbass off topic crack like are there any 13 year old girls on those shows.
It has already been established that we are on the opposite end of the spectrum on this topic and we are all just looking like a bunch of immature assholes even discussing it. But you and your boys (and that bitch Barman) just keep proving to everybody else in The RX who the shit starters and drama posters are.
Enfuego if in your mind I am a rapist and a hardened criminal of the worse kind do you think for a moment that I would allow myself to get beat up by some punk who hasn't tussled in 17 years? As much as you believe that consensual sex = rapist and molester. I truly believe there are no rules in a street fight and I am talking from experience. For the simple fact that you want to report me to the DA and get me arrested for having a younger girlfriend when I was 19 years old is all I need to know that you don't have the heart to fuck with me. Where I come from snitches and bitches end up in stitches or in graves.
