Guilty until proven innocent?

Search

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Horapesnatcher and zeeman just went in together on Mike Jackson's used van. Ho' will park it in front of junior high schools and zee will work the night shift driving through the Happy Valley community

free-candy-van1-300x199.jpg
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
My favorite Michael Jackson youtube music clip

 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
This has got to be one of the stupidest arguments I have ever heard in here.

So, if someone believes that God has the right to punish someone in hell, ergo
they can't disapprove of anyone else hurting anyone else in any way, because
that hurt pales in comparison to hell.

You could use the same idiotic argument to say that we can't punish murderers
and pedophiles either. Heck using your argument, anyone who believes in hell
needs to just shut their mouth about Jerry Sandusky and his 40+ child rapes.
^<<^:ohno:
I find it amusing that you continue to make derogatory comments about something that you repeatedly fail to understand, as has been demonstrated before and here again:

First of all, you mistated the argument, which does not speak of God's "right to punish someone in hell", which could concievably be a hand slap, but rather torturing billions for all eternity.

Secondly, your conclusions are only ridiculous ideas borne of your own imagination.
So you missed the point completely. Wanna guess again?

Third, obviously they can "disaprove" of anything they want to, whether or not it is
valid, or overblown in the extreme. However when someone disaproves of a light
offence in relation to a far more heinous one that they approve of, then they are
"straining a gnat while swallowing a camel".
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
I think the bottom line here is that someone possibly made a mistake when they were young dumb and full of cum. And it was probably against the local law as it now stands, though what the law was then, many years ago when this occurred, may be another issue. And nothing will likely ever come of it, except a few guys with too much time on their hands, chips on their shoulders, blowing off steam, putting someone else down to make themselves feel better about their own miserable existence, shortcomings and failures in life. IOW rape of another type and probably worse than the Romeo and Juliet kind, if that was a rape at all.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
2,369
Tokens
Horapesnatcher and zeeman just went in together on Mike Jackson's used van. Ho' will park it in front of junior high schools and zee will work the night shift driving through the Happy Valley community

free-candy-van1-300x199.jpg

I would bet that you and Steak tartar are like that judge in Texas that took off his belt and whip his 15 year old daughter for having consensual sex with her boyfriend. The only difference is you and Steak probably drop your own pants before whipping your daughters. Barman and Steak are Hippocrits!!!!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
2,369
Tokens
Barman,

I find it amusing how you need to be negatively judging Michael Jackson. One of the most famous person in the history of the world who had his day in court and was aquitted, but you find it necessary to judge him negatively. Again, I must ask who the F do you think your are.

I'm done with this battle, I've have made many valid points and when your dealing with closed minded, hippricatical idiots you end up wasting a lot of time.

Barman, Enfuego and Tartar have gotten their point across. The point being you guys should have purchased the case of vasoline when it was on sale at Walgreens. This way when that duck gets put up your butt it can be removed much easier. Closed minded bitches.

Sorry for all the decent people I have rubbed the wrong way, but I have a difficult time biting my tougue when I witness inappropiate behavior.

This will be my final post in this thread, I've proven my point and please keep an open mind when you hear sore butt hippo's calling consensual sex rape.

Adios Amigo's
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,947
Tokens
Barman,

I find it amusing how you need to be negatively judging Michael Jackson. One of the most famous person in the history of the world who had his day in court and was aquitted, but you find it necessary to judge him negatively. Again, I must ask who the F do you think your are.

I'm done with this battle, I've have made many valid points and when your dealing with closed minded, hippricatical idiots you end up wasting a lot of time.

Barman, Enfuego and Tartar have gotten their point across. The point being you guys should have purchased the case of vasoline when it was on sale at Walgreens. This way when that duck gets put up your butt it can be removed much easier. Closed minded bitches.

Sorry for all the decent people I have rubbed the wrong way, but I have a difficult time biting my tougue when I witness inappropiate behavior.

This will be my final post in this thread, I've proven my point and please keep an open mind when you hear sore butt hippo's calling consensual sex rape.

Adios Amigo's


Um, not approving of child rape is not close-minded.

Nice try though.

PS. Ever heard of a spell-checker?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,947
Tokens
I find it amusing that you continue to make derogatory comments about something that you repeatedly fail to understand, as has been demonstrated before and here again:

First of all, you mistated the argument, which does not speak of God's "right to punish someone in hell", which could concievably be a hand slap, but rather torturing billions for all eternity.

Secondly, your conclusions are only ridiculous ideas borne of your own imagination.
So you missed the point completely. Wanna guess again?

Third, obviously they can "disaprove" of anything they want to, whether or not it is
valid, or overblown in the extreme. However when someone disaproves of a light
offence in relation to a far more heinous one that they approve of, then they are
"straining a gnat while swallowing a camel".

I give up, you clearly just aren't very bright.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
2,369
Tokens
Wow, because I know how to spell, that makes me a geek?

Brilliant.

My bad. Who knows what you are. You claim you know how to spell, you point out my spelling mistakes. Who cares if someone spells a word wrong. Obviously you do. I bet it gave you instant gratification to point out my spelling errors. You may not be a geek but you sure are a little biacth.

Even with my spelling errors this is much easier to understand than your double negative posting about not being a non closed minded rapist who never had non consensual hetero sex. Some english major you aren't not. Ha Ha Ha



Whatever
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
Um, not approving of child rape is not close-minded.


Actually it is in many cases, with many people, depending on the definition of child and rape. Obviously some of the posters in this thread appear quite closed minded. Just review some of your comments, for example. Rather than respond to reasoning with the same, you constantly come back with mantras like the above, which you may think are so clever. I'm sure they are convincing to those who are too lazy for or incapable of rational discussion, and dieing to "hang em high" at the nearest tree.

BTW, some US states and countries throughout history have legally approved of consentual sex between 13 year olds [as well as 14-17 YO] and those older, and not classified it as rape, let alone "child rape". But don't let the facts get in the way of your agenda.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,947
Tokens
Actually it is in many cases, with many people, depending on the definition of child and rape. Obviously some of the posters in this thread appear quite closed minded. Just review some of your comments, for example. Rather than respond to reasoning with the same, you constantly come back with mantras like the above, which you may think are so clever. I'm sure they are convincing to those who are too lazy for or incapable of rational discussion, and dieing to "hang em high" at the nearest tree.

BTW, some US states and countries throughout history have legally approved of consentual sex between 13 year olds [as well as 14-17 YO] and those older, and not classified it as rape, let alone "child rape". But don't let the facts get in the way of your agenda.

ROFL. I'm the one with an agenda? We both know you yourself fantasize banging 13 year old girls. What about 12, you into that too?

Get 'em before their 8 or it's too late, right?

Sick fuck.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
2,369
Tokens
Actually it is in many cases, with many people, depending on the definition of child and rape. Obviously some of the posters in this thread appear quite closed minded. Just review some of your comments, for example. Rather than respond to reasoning with the same, you constantly come back with mantras like the above, which you may think are so clever. I'm sure they are convincing to those who are too lazy for or incapable of rational discussion, and dieing to "hang em high" at the nearest tree.

BTW, some US states and countries throughout history have legally approved of consentual sex between 13 year olds [as well as 14-17 YO] and those older, and not classified it as rape, let alone "child rape". But don't let the facts get in the way of your agenda.

X,

Even though you have been referred to as not very bright by some english major in this forum, I get you and I think your very bright. Your above post is right on regarding FZ. Who knows if he understands what your're saying , since he's in denial and he also thinks your not so bright. FZ is probably looking for your spelling errors, but your message probably goes in one ear and out the other.

Thanks for your support, but it's obvious we're wasting our time. Keep up the good work.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Wow, because I know how to spell, that makes me a geek?

Brilliant.

No, you're pretty much a geek for the same reason I am......We're just wired that way

I will send you a Klub Kard asap
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
X,

Even though you have been referred to as not very bright by some english major in this forum, I get you and I think your very bright. Your above post is right on regarding FZ. Who knows if he understands what your're saying , since he's in denial and he also thinks your not so bright. FZ is probably looking for your spelling errors, but your message probably goes in one ear and out the other.

Thanks for your support, but it's obvious we're wasting our time. Keep up the good work.

Things like pointing out spelling errors is a great contribution to the subject at hand[not], which indicates the maturity level of some here is of about a 9 year old, and goes to show that most 13 year olds can make better decisions re sex than some of these guys. Anyway i've enjoyed your contributions, zeeman, and those of hosnatcher to this thread, with the many excellent points you guys have made.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
2,369
Tokens
No, you're pretty much a geek for the same reason I am......We're just wired that way

I will send you a Klub Kard asap

Hey we finally agree on a few things.

1. Everybody is different, except you and festering zit. You boys are perfect!

2. Yes you won. Pay yourself $100

3. You have zero credibility. Your a fruad, see post #110 putting words in my
mouth. Who knows how many times you have played that game. Not that your
a geek, but what you did was pretty geeky. You do agree?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,615
Messages
13,535,475
Members
100,384
Latest member
ahlamabbas
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com