I hear everything your saying. And my database isn't any different than yours. It shows TCU to be the overwhelming choice...On paper. But I get that same funny feeling about this game as you do. As much as we try to use logic in our plays, sometimes there is something more to it, like the intangibles. I may be overthinking this game. But I think everybody has to admit that Boise has an uncanny way of winning big games. This TCU game isn't unlike the game Boise played two years ago against OU. The Sooners didn't have a great offense, but they were fairly well balanced and had a good running game behind Adrian Peterson, and a very good defense that year. And they were pretty much the majority choice to win. Just like if you ask the board here who they like, 9 out of 10 will say TCU if you go by the RX survey. But Boise scored more points on OU than anybody did all year. And they did it by playing balls to the wall football and never letting up. Peterson seems to get his team super motivated for these kinds of games. And they stay with you for a full 60 minutes. So I think no matter how much they get rattled by the TCU defense, they'll keep coming at them. My concern with TCU is making mistakes. Against good defenses they tend to make mistakes. They had 5 turnovers against OU. And the two interceptions they threw against Utah was costly. And they only managed to score 10 points against both of those teams. Something else that Boise does different than OU or Utah does is they will throw a bunch of different formations at you, and line up players in positions that you normally wouldn't see them in. It makes it very confusing on even the best defenses. So Patterson has his work cut out for him in preparing for this team. It's true that except for Oregon that Boise really hasn't been tested. But they've also done everything they are suppose to do against inferior competetion. So it's hard for me to say many negative things about Boise. They are a well coached well disciplined team. It doesn't mean TCU won't get the win here. But I think it's going down to the wire either way.Everything in my database points to TCU, but i have a funny feeling about this one. I don't like fading Boise.
Boise, for the most part, is an untested team. They played Oregon when the Ducks were really banged up and the WAC offered zero resistance as usual. Coming in to the season, Boise only returned 12 starters, so i was kind of surprised to see them decimate their competition like they did. I thought they may be a little weaker this season, so they could be good fade material in this game.
Last edited: