For you diehard mask wearers - will you still wear them after your Gov’s say it’s okay to stop

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
15,891
Tokens
Me too ... & I won't wear 1

In South Florida you can't go into stores without it

I got my haircut today and didnt wear one - at crossfit, typically one person takes the mask off and then everyone takes it off - if ur 20, 30, 40 or 50 without any underlying conditions this thing is a hoax - if ur 70 you might want to be cautious
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
101,988
Tokens
In South Florida you can't go into stores without it

I got my haircut today and didnt wear one - at crossfit, typically one person takes the mask off and then everyone takes it off - if ur 20, 30, 40 or 50 without any underlying conditions this thing is a hoax - if ur 70 you might want to be cautious

The flu part is real, the media and left April fool joke that has crushed this country and fools still fall for

Went to Orthopedic Doctor this morn. Wore no mask in waiting area or in examining room
 

New member
Joined
May 24, 2018
Messages
1,749
Tokens
Like i already said earlier in this thread (post #9) i've been wearing a mask about 30 minutes per every 24 hours.

Did you wear a mask during flu season of 2019?

2018?

2017?

2016?

2015?

2014?

2013?

2012?

2011?

2010?

2009?

2008?

2007?

2006?

2005?

2004?

2003?

2002?

2001?

2000?

1999?

1998?

1997?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens

Northern Star,

If you are trying to argue with low IQ people that use the improper use of masks as their rationale that masks don't work or someone that say Asians wear them because they eat bat dick, you are wasting your time. This is the type of idiocy you get on this forum now. And it's unfortunate, that the conversation has come down to these type of immature and moronic comments. Masks are clearly effective to a lesser degree but the gold standard has always been distancing. And anyone that doesn't have the common sense to understand that staying away from infectious people won't reduce the spread of disease is not worth arguing with.

Unfortunately when people like this steer a conversation into a Blue Team, Red Team argument, it detracts from the real issue. Simply put, it is the shutting down of an economy in exchange for a loss of lives. I'm guessing someone like yourself might argue that if we even save one life, it's worth it (but feel free to elaborate in your own words). My viewpoint is much more statistical based and I would say that there is a significant price to pay if people aren't allowed to work and put food on their table (which can also result in a severe financial hardship and possibly a loss of life itself). Clearly there will be some casualties. What percentage of people dying is acceptable is the $64k question. I think people on both sides of this argument can have a civil disagreement on this without all the childish bullshit. Unfortunately, you can lose a lot of brain cells when people are allowed to go unchecked in arguments like these.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
I should also add Northern Star that clearly this certainly doesn't have to be an all-or-nothing scenario. We can co-exist with protocols being put in place temporarily. Most people in my neck of the woods (Williamson County, Texas) have complied with minimum levels of safety and the numbers have certainly come down dramatically. There are still disagreements with extremists on both sides (i.e. some people aren't pleased that I wear a shield and not a mask and that it's acceptable at most places). We do need to get back to some form of normalcy and people certainly need to be allowed to work. And certainly the fear mongering needs to stop as it's not helping anything.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
Northern Star,

If you are trying to argue with low IQ people that use the improper use of masks as their rationale that masks don't work or someone that say Asians wear them because they eat bat dick, you are wasting your time. This is the type of idiocy you get on this forum now. And it's unfortunate, that the conversation has come down to these type of immature and moronic comments. Masks are clearly effective to a lesser degree but the gold standard has always been distancing. And anyone that doesn't have the common sense to understand that staying away from infectious people won't reduce the spread of disease is not worth arguing with.

Unfortunately when people like this steer a conversation into a Blue Team, Red Team argument, it detracts from the real issue. Simply put, it is the shutting down of an economy in exchange for a loss of lives. I'm guessing someone like yourself might argue that if we even save one life, it's worth it (but feel free to elaborate in your own words). My viewpoint is much more statistical based and I would say that there is a significant price to pay if people aren't allowed to work and put food on their table (which can also result in a severe financial hardship and possibly a loss of life itself). Clearly there will be some casualties. What percentage of people dying is acceptable is the $64k question. I think people on both sides of this argument can have a civil disagreement on this without all the childish bullshit. Unfortunately, you can lose a lot of brain cells when people are allowed to go unchecked in arguments like these.

I see this argument popping up again, probably because of Biden. People want to close up everything for three months and think everything will be all right and back to normal are just not realistic. Who can afford to do that? Anyone in a service industry really felt the economic pain this year, another shutdown will be the end for many more businesses. A lot of countries did the manditory mask-wearing, business shutdown etc, only to have cases pop back to peak.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
I see this argument popping up again, probably because of Biden. People want to close up everything for three months and think everything will be all right and back to normal are just not realistic. Who can afford to do that? Anyone in a service industry really felt the economic pain this year, another shutdown will be the end for many more businesses. A lot of countries did the manditory mask-wearing, business shutdown etc, only to have cases pop back to peak.

Politics aside, I have no idea why anyone would think that is a good idea at this point. Clearly there was plenty we didn't know about this virus when the country was first hit with it. I think to a large extent, the protocols that have been put in place are doing the job. The methodical and measured increase in capacities at this point have not increased numbers. Unlike when Texas first re-opened, we have not been sidetracked by knuckleheads protesting or the cast of idiots that thought it was a good idea to party on Memorial Day (Labor Day was nothing like that). I'm hoping to see continual progress.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
Politics aside, I have no idea why anyone would think that is a good idea at this point. Clearly there was plenty we didn't know about this virus when the country was first hit with it. I think to a large extent, the protocols that have been put in place are doing the job. The methodical and measured increase in capacities at this point have not increased numbers. Unlike when Texas first re-opened, we have not been sidetracked by knuckleheads protesting or the cast of idiots that thought it was a good idea to party on Memorial Day (Labor Day was nothing like that). I'm hoping to see continual progress.

unfortunately politics has a lot to do with it. It’s hard to believe it wouldn’t be handled different if it wasn’t an election year. I watch news from all over the world, and everyone else feels the same way about their government.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 9, 2004
Messages
2,770
Tokens
Northern Star,

If you are trying to argue with low IQ people that use the improper use of masks as their rationale that masks don't work or someone that say Asians wear them because they eat bat dick, you are wasting your time. This is the type of idiocy you get on this forum now. And it's unfortunate, that the conversation has come down to these type of immature and moronic comments. Masks are clearly effective to a lesser degree but the gold standard has always been distancing. And anyone that doesn't have the common sense to understand that staying away from infectious people won't reduce the spread of disease is not worth arguing with.

Unfortunately when people like this steer a conversation into a Blue Team, Red Team argument, it detracts from the real issue. Simply put, it is the shutting down of an economy in exchange for a loss of lives. I'm guessing someone like yourself might argue that if we even save one life, it's worth it (but feel free to elaborate in your own words). My viewpoint is much more statistical based and I would say that there is a significant price to pay if people aren't allowed to work and put food on their table (which can also result in a severe financial hardship and possibly a loss of life itself). Clearly there will be some casualties. What percentage of people dying is acceptable is the $64k question. I think people on both sides of this argument can have a civil disagreement on this without all the childish bullshit. Unfortunately, you can lose a lot of brain cells when people are allowed to go unchecked in arguments like these.

Good post!
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,912
Tokens
Hard for you stay on topic......attention span is almost as short as your unit

Also for you. So many threads you take a shot at Trump , then dissapear. Just like to hear where you might stand with another politician .. Are you capable of answering ? I've only asked it a dozen times in various threads with no answer ..
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
Common sense should tell you , if you start touching that mask and your face , and don't immediately don't wash your hands , masks can probably have a negative affect...

Touching your face is irrelevant. Only touching your nose, mouth or eyes is relevant.

Masks keep you from touching your face behind the mask.

Masks remind people not to touch their face & others to wear a mask & act responsibly & keep their distance.

The scientific evidence & the vast majority of health experts say masks work. Which is why almost every country on earth either mandates or recommends their use.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
"You and I are walking through the African savanna - actually I am walking - you have no legs so you are dragging yourself. A hungry lion appears and we attempt to make it 50 yards to the safety of the Jeep. I run easily to the Jeep but you have no legs (a pre-existing condition) and die. So what killed you - the lion or the pre-existing condition ???

In your logic - the pre-existing condition killed you.
My reasoning - the lion killed you. You could live with a pre-existing condition.

In your world - you would open the gate and let the lion's run free because anyone with a pre-existing condition really isn't worth the effort of saving. I had a friend who died from COVID. Yes she was a diabetic but she was a wonderful person. Now I listen to arguments that basically say .' I'm not wearing a mask because I'm not going to die - just old farts, fat people and diabetics.

Wear the fucking mask !"


 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,444
Messages
13,533,391
Members
100,367
Latest member
rcdjbp
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com