why would i say that is "hating"? Im fully aware his betting value sucks. I dont claim him to be the best golfer i've ever seen because he has good betting value, i claim him to be the best golfer ever because so far in his career that just what he has proven to be!!!!
I did bet on him a few times last year when he had decent odds for a guy thats won 2.5x's more tourn (thats at a minimum) than any other golfer in the fields last year.
The "decent odds" you speak of are all based on how many previous tournaments he's won. But the problem is, he's not the same golfer that won those tournaments; at the present time he's just another pro who has no more or less chance of winning than a couple dozen other guys. Those previous wins are completely irrelevant from a betting standpoint.
lol, you keep posting foolish remarks. Tiger plays an individual sport, not a team sport. Your example is idiotic to say the least. Here is another stat for you that disproves your “leaps and bounds” theory.
19-6....that’s the number of 2nd place finishes in majors for Jack-Tiger.
I think Tiger is great too but stop saying he is leaps and bounds better than Jack. You look foolish.
I’ll add this since you think Jack played against no one...
Gary Player...9 Major wins
Tom Watson..8
Arnie Palmer..7
Lee Trevino....6
Seve Ballesteros..5
Jack finished 2nd more than 10 times to the players listed above also in majors.
When you can post a list of players in Tigers era with that many majors won, get back to me.
