Dawkins has some interesting theories, particularly around memetics
but I believe in god. I also believe to an extent some of evolutionary theory is true
I dont believe in randomness however.
For those that buy Darwinism completely...
do you believe lighting struck a pond and the species in that pond "evolved" by chance of this random event?
I have a hard time believing single cell organisms evolved into homosapiens, but I also dont believe the universe is 6000 years old either.
but I believe in god. I also believe to an extent some of evolutionary theory is true
I dont believe in randomness however.
For those that buy Darwinism completely...
do you believe lighting struck a pond and the species in that pond "evolved" by chance of this random event?
I have a hard time believing single cell organisms evolved into homosapiens, but I also dont believe the universe is 6000 years old either.
No, let's start 'here'
You have so far
a) Ignored the quote I put regarding Behe own's admision that his own models showed that ID was b.s
b) You posted an excerpt with the whopping amount of 6012 words in an attempt to 'flash' everyone with the incredible 'intellectual weight' of Mr 'Have a degree in everything from human biology to sociology,counseling and psychology', FACT IS that most of this 'article' does nothing but list a bunch of courses that do not teach evolution
is it ANYONE'S surprise that evolution is irrelevant in courses such as Art Appreciation, Handball, Archery and Bowling? we all can really live without knowing every single course he suposedly took and we dont need 6000 words and 447 lines to agree with that
c) Ignored the obvious fact that this Bergman 'scientist' doesn't care about fundamentals in chemisty and physics as he has to do that to support his 'young earth views'
d) Ignored my post about one of Bergman's degree that came from a non accredited and now defunct DISTANCE learning and then you had the nerve of saying "
That is the scenario SO FAR
first of all at least I have the excuse that English is not my first language
but I will entertain you by complying with your request and let's see if NOW you understand/debate or ignore what I said.
"btw he COULD MOST CERTAINLY teach chemistry AND physics in a way that fits in HIS Sunday School
It goes like this "everything we see in nuclear physics.........the decay of the atom into simpler ones.......the rate at which this happens, the very perception we have of this phenomena.....their uses in anthropology, geology, paleontology,archaeology etc...... its nothing but a DELUSION...........I ASURE YOU........because.......all that points to.........a planet that is older than 6000 years........and we know this is WRONG (all this nonsense coming from chemistry and physics) because........" ??????"
changes where antropology into anthropology and delution into delusion
ok, now you can address the issue on how this person is getting a degree in chemistry while he claims the Earth is 6000 and therefore radiometric datings are bs.
nope, you are just going to ignore this 'little issue' again.
I graceously accept your surrender. Next time look up the biography of whatever author you are going to quote. That will save you the embarrasment of being in a corner and having to defend/avoid their crazy positions (such this guy Bergman, his degrees in chemistry and his 'idea' of young earth...)
btw, saying 'liar liar pants on fire' without saying where supposedly I lied...might make you feel good but anyone paying attention to the debate knows its bs.
Someone answer me this please.
If evolution is a myth and we all are descendants of Noah then how come there are white people, black people, Asians, eskimos, aboriginies and so on and so forth
Many of those cultures' languages have no traces of Hebrew (or whatever Noah spoke) and their cultures have absolutely no stories about a certain flood that happened around the time of Noah
If evolution is a myth and we all are descendants of Noah then how come there are white people, black people, Asians, eskimos, aboriginies and so on and so forth
Many of those cultures' languages have no traces of Hebrew (or whatever Noah spoke) and their cultures have absolutely no stories about a certain flood that happened around the time of Noah
Um, because you say it's true it must be huh? Yawn.
Please tell me if you agree with this statement:
Richard Dawkins (prominent proponent of the religion of Darwinism):
"Humans have always wondered about the meaning of life...
life has no higher purpose than to perpetuate the survival of DNA...
life has no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but
blind pitiless indifference."
boooo
does that mean that you are going to keep posting links with over 6000 words.....and when call on any of it, ignore the issue and say the other person 'lied and twisted your words' and start fresh?
if your best answer to anything is a dry 'you lied' then why would anyone waste their time answering any of your postings??
stop asking questions if you can't handle the answers
Well it makes a whole lot more sense than that there is an all powerul entity that can do and create anything it wants yet needs us to believe in him and that his son died for our sins. He can accomplish anything with a snap of his finger but always needs humans to accomplish his goals for him
Ok Wolfie, you win. I now believe that we all evolved from
chimpanzees (or a common ancestor). And, chimps evolved
from a pile of goo. And the goo came from... oh wait, the Darwinists
don't want to argue about abiogenesis.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAHAHAAH
The evidence is so overwhelming everyone should believe in the
religion of Darwinism. BWHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHAH
Excuse me while I go eat some bananas.
chimpanzees (or a common ancestor). And, chimps evolved
from a pile of goo. And the goo came from... oh wait, the Darwinists
don't want to argue about abiogenesis.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAHAHAAH
The evidence is so overwhelming everyone should believe in the
religion of Darwinism. BWHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHAH
Excuse me while I go eat some bananas.
