Despite Overwhelming Evidence, Creationists Cling to Unreality

[festeringZit]

<center> <center>THE ONLY MACRO-EVOLUTION OF MAN THAT HAS EVER BEEN
"PROVED" TO HAVE OCCURRED, IS THAT WHICH HAS COME OUT OF THE MIND AND IMAGINATION OF JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE EVOLUCYISTS!</center>

</center>



ALL OF THE SOURCES (far left) THAT ARE CITED HERE ARE PURPORTED TO BE AUTHORITATIVE, ACCURATE AND "CANONIZED" BY THE SCIENTIFIC <strike>CLERGY</strike> COMMUNITY.

EVERY METAPHYSICAL STAGE OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, FROM APE TO MODERN MAN, ARE REPRESENTED BY THIS SINGULAR INDIVIDUAL!

TO TOP THIS OFF, THE SKULL (bottom right) OF "MS LUCY" WAS CREATED BY, AND I QUOTE, "TIM WHITE...MADE THIS RECONSTRUCTION OF AFARENSIS SKULL, USING PARTS OF SEVERAL INDIVIDUALS."!!! (source; LUCY The Beginnings of Humankind, pg.352)

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE SERIOUSNESS OF THESE FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS OF THE "EVOLUTION OF MAN"?

NO? WELL, IT IS THIS.

WE THE STUDENTS AND PUBLIC, OR AS SOME ACADEMICS SAY THE GREAT UNWASHED, HAVE BEEN DUPED INTO BELIEVING THE "FACT OF HUMAN EVOLUTION" BY AN ARROGANT, SELF-RIGHTEOUS (AND SELF-DECIEVED) SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY.
A COMMUNITY, BY THE WAY, THAT REFUSES TO TOLERATE ANY PUBLIC PRESENTATION OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT COULD FALSIFY THEIR METAPHYSICAL, OR MORE ACCURATELY, RELIGIOUS BELIEFS!

 

[festeringZit]

<center>THESE JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIONS, BY MACRO-EVOLUCYISTS, HAVE BEEN ARRANGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE <strike>DOGMA</strike> DOCTRINE OF "MONKEY TO <strike>MAN</strike> MAME" MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY FAITH!
</center>

AS ABSURD AS THE SCIENCE COMMUNITY WILL OBVIOUSLY SAY THIS ILLUSTRATION IS, THE FACT REMAINS, IT IS AS LEGITIMATE A METAPHYSICAL POINT OF VIEW AS THEY HAVE FORCED DOWN SOCIETY'S THROAT FOR THE PAST 60+ YEARS! NEITHER THIS ILLUSTRATION OR THEIRS CAN BE CONCLUSIVELY VERIFIED OR FALSIFIED BY THE EMPIRICAL SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
BY FAITH, AND FAITH ALONE, YOU EITHER "BELIEVE IT OR NOT!"
http://www.omniology.com/OMNIOLOGY-Content.html

 

[festeringZit]

I was taught this fraudulent trash in school as "science" when
it was in actuality a total lie.

 

[barman]

ZIT, there are literally thousands of universities teaching the various aspects of Darwin's theories and subsequent theories and discoveries from the past century that facilitate Darwin's initial thesis.

You should be immediately contacting all of these thousands of universities and setting them straight.

 

[wolfie_cr]

I agree that the 5,000 or 6,000 year time frame is an extreme that some very ardent Christians adhere to - but I would never try to belittle their belief because I don't necessarily agree with them.

In other words, similarly you would have no objection to someone teaching polytheist religions from Africa and say "they are exactly as valid as any other monotheist religion" while standing in a biology class for pre med students.......in say.....any major university of the US, you can't belittle them or tell them that they are wrong........they are as equally 'valid' in your head and if they claim that taking a picture of them.........someone captures the essence of their soul........that is not to be laughed at. Furthermore if they tell the goverment that they dont want a picture of them taken for a drivers license......there is nothing wrong with that.

Is my extrapolation correct?

 

[festeringZit]

 

[wolfie_cr]

In this part I will agree (madness!) with Zit

There is/has been/will always be fraud in anything humans do......fraud in religion, fraud in science, fraud in economics.....fraud in politics..............:missingte

Difference is that when its fraud in science, the other scientists expose them. Fraud in politics........well you know what you do with them, you reelect them, fraud in religion................."it was not suposed to be a literal interpretation......little one" :nohead:

Using this same logic I propose to

a) deny Newton's findings in gravity....it is WELL KNOWN that he deliberatly manipulated his measurements

b) deny Relativity, the first 'proof' of this theory.......was a solar eclipse that showed certain gravitational effect based on the Sun's mass...it turns out that the degree of certainty of the measurements was so big......that it didnt prove anything at all

c) not a scientist but a sailor.....Columbus is another fool, he lied with his projections........even though he was already using the most optimist value of the Earth's diameter , had America not been in the way......they would have killed him in the middle of the Atlantic.

 

[festeringZit]

In this part I will agree (madness!) with Zit

There is/has been/will always be fraud in anything humans do......fraud in religion, fraud in science, fraud in economics.....fraud in politics..............:missingte

Difference is that when its fraud in science, the other scientists expose them. Fraud in politics........well you know what you do with them, you reelect them, fraud in religion................."it was not suposed to be a literal interpretation......little one" :nohead:




Using this same logic I propose to

a) deny Newton's findings in gravity....it is WELL KNOWN that he deliberatly manipulated his measurements

b) deny Relativity, the first 'proof' of this theory.......was a solar eclipse that showed certain gravitational effect based on the Sun's mass...it turns out that the degree of certainty of the measurements was so big......that it didnt prove anything at all

c) not a scientist but a sailor.....Columbus is another fool, he lied with his projections........even though he was already using the most optimist value of the Earth's diameter , had America not been in the way......they would have killed him in the middle of the Atlantic.

ROFL. You're comparing the fraud of Darwinism to something that
can actually be demonstrated empirically like gravity.

BWHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH.

 

[wolfie_cr]

I thought you would find enlighting to know that there has been fraud in many other fields of science but I overestimated you

btw, now we know that Newton was wrong with his gravitational laws so there it goes......

 

[festeringZit]

I thought you would find enlighting to know that there has been fraud in many other fields of science but I overestimated you

btw, now we know that Newton was wrong with his gravitational laws so there it goes......

Wolf,

As an aside, I'd like to see the documentation for your claim that
Newton deliberately manipulated measurements.

 

[wolfie_cr]

Ok I will have to ask for a raincheck (at work now ) but if I find something on the internet by just googling will post it (if I recall correctly I rad about this when I college but I am sure I can find it somehow)

 

[wolfie_cr]

Wolf,

As an aside, I'd like to see the documentation for your claim that
Newton deliberately manipulated measurements.

crap....cant find anything conclusive online but this is what I have so far

from http://politicalmavens.com/index.php/2007/03/18/to-tell-the-truth/ .... " Fraud was a factor even in the work of the greatest scientists – schoolbooks don’t mention Sir Isaac Newton, in physics, and Gregor Mendel, in genetics, both published experimental results too good to be true. "

also found a book in amazon that seems to have something related and is this one http://www.amazon.com/Corrupted-Science-Fraud-Ideology-Politics/dp/1904332730 for 100% for sure that book is not where I read it

Finding it online the closest I came is the dispute about the discovery of calculus (Newton vrs Leibniz) but that is not even close to what I mentioned

if I find a direct and straightforward reference I will post it (I just dont have a link because I didnt read it online nor do I remember in what book I read it)