Chase Systems: Quesion For Those That Use And/Or Follow Them Regarding Sides & Totals

[whalewager]

post your tickets and allow them to be verified...

 

[SSI]

who are you talking too?

i can give you my locals cell number, if you wish..... i play at greek and have 2 locals (3 for football)... i can easily get down 2k if need be but very few make it that far...

Tom: you ceratinly would not be ahead $2200 this season, not close...

SSI

 

[tatehill2000]

The real JOKE is that the only thing that matters is betting on something that has a positive expected value. If you can do that, you will win money no matter how you vary your bet size. If you bet on something that has a negative expected value you will lose money no matter how you vary your bet size. Varying bet sizes can maximize or minimize earnings and losses, but it can not change the overall chances to being in your favor if it would not be a good bet without using the chase system

Eclipse has at least written his views coherently, so while I doubt he will change any opinions I am curious to see the exact formula he follows

Tom, your above words apply to everyone, every bet, no matter thier techniques,,, Not just mine,

And my expectation with my betting systems is to win on the first play, I could post my math just as SSI did, but I believe the point was made well enough by him for me NOT to do that,,,

no matter the progression as long as I win 4 units then lose 3,, Im a winner.

oh and I always post in bold, so get used to it,

so heres my question to Hache, to whale, to tom and all, is there anything Positive that you can say abotu progresions?
heres the math by the way

http://saliu.com/Fibonacci.html

 

[TomGshotput]

Tom: you ceratinly would not be ahead $2200 this season, not close...

I didn't ask where it wouldn't be. . .

Since the average bet size is a lot smaller ($50 every bet compared to a minimum of $50 and sometimes as much as $2246 if playing -110), of course the profit would be a lot smaller. But if betting the same amount shows any profit at all on a -110 line, that means it hits 53%. And then the question becomes, if you can hit 53% in two different sports, why are you still playing for a measly $50?

 

[TomGshotput]

so heres my question to Hache, to whale, to tom and all, is there anything Positive that you can say abotu progresions? http://saliu.com/Fibonacci.html

Here's one: If you pick winners you'll be successful

(of course that is true for anyone who bets whether they use a system like this or one completely different)
(unfortunately for anyone whether they use this system or a completely different one, if you pick losers you won't be successful. . . )

 

[FullyEclipsed]

like i said its all good on paper.......it is like a race track system..bet the 4 horse every race he will win some race on some day........but at what point is it beyond reasonable/feasible

Come on now Steak... This is a bad bad example and you know it..

Do people really do this? hno:

From the very little I know about horses the payouts are never a given when you lay the dough.

 

[FullyEclipsed]

Before trying this seriously, you should look up Martingale Betting Systems. Wikipedia has a good writeup;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)

It doesn't work in casinos because they limit bet sizes. It won't work in sports because you will only have a finite amount of money in offshore books.

Using this system will guarantee your accounts will someday hit zero. Your only hope is that you die before this happens.

I'll look this one over for kicks but I can guarantee it's all straight forward double up methods.. We'll see

 

[FullyEclipsed]

Hache,

You been around the boards long enough to know this thread would be heated... Good job @)

 

[FullyEclipsed]

Here's one: If you pick winners you'll be successful

(of course that is true for anyone who bets whether they use a system like this or one completely different)
(unfortunately for anyone whether they use this system or a completely different one, if you pick losers you won't be successful. . . )

Not one person would argue this.. It is a fact.

The thing that draws me the most to doing this is for 1 sport only. I have dabbled a bit with the NBA but just can't find something that I really like.

I play this strictly on MLB.

1. I watch Zero baseball- Never liked it.
2. There is so many games that a team plays that there is great potential in picking spots.
3. I can take all emotions out of the bets because I play the numbers.

 

[whalewager]

hey fellers...what u guys talking about in here

 

[FullyEclipsed]

lmao. My mentor in the chase game is here..

 

[tatehill2000]

hey fellers...what u guys talking about in here

your mamma

 

[ACE-ACE]

one thing that is not talked about in any chase system....The Capper....
if he is winning 58% or more vs losing in the season (let's say he is 45%) the capper's odds are better to beat a chase system!
For me I did it for fun now at 221-0...I'm at a point that if I do lose 7 games in a row...I will still be ahead...I do side money on each play that
my record is 178-140 =56% +$19,314...the money I made in the chase is only $2980

http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?p=6430037#post6430037

1 unit to me is $1000 so this will not kill me if I lose 2.5 units...after doing this for a year...I only came to the 7 mark once in 318 games(won it)
this is not a system for everyone...I did this only to see how far I could get with it on a off season form NFL!...I did it for one reason...I have never lost 7 key games in a row...if you do not rush into your plays after a lost and sometime go a few days to find the best of the best play...you can make it work.

1st= the capper
2nd = big bankroll and betting a small chase ($10-$30 to start)

if this is not you....walk away!

best to all
Ace-Ace

 

[joeybagadonuts]

LOL.
Nice thread. People like Ace-Ace, Tater, and SSI make me want to become a bookie. Chase "systems" and martingaling? You must be fuckin kidding me, right? SSI you've been posting your "systems" for years, and not a one has ever worked. If you really had a "system" that did, you'd be rich and retired on an island you owned.

FACT.

 

[FullyEclipsed]

LOL.
Nice thread. People like Ace-Ace, Tater, and SSI make me want to become a bookie. Chase "systems" and martingaling? You must be fuckin kidding me, right? SSI you've been posting your "systems" for years, and not a one has ever worked. If you really had a "system" that did, you'd be rich and retired on an island you owned.

FACT.

WTF? Am I on ignore...@)

Post up or credit?

 

[timotinbowen]

Wow. I hope there aren't any math teachers in this thread. And the link to the Fibonacci Sequence had me

 

[SSI]

im glad to see all the lifetime losers chiming in, telling someone else they are going to lose..

look in the mirror, pal...

i could care less, what anyone else thinks...... i have no time for close minded people...

take care..

SSI

 

[ToddInVegas]

Bump for SSI.

Good luck tomorrow! Two big wagers tomorrow of approx $2300 each for NY Knicks Under and Washington Under. If you hit win both you will have $100 profit in your pocket. If you lose I know a good soup kitchen you can get dinner at.

They may win, I hope they do but I think we can all see that this is not a good way to bet and longterm will crush your bankroll.

 

[1968]

if the man wants to do this kind of betting- let him.

 

[XXXylic]

Wizzards under winner! Nice job SSI!