California Turning into Nazi Germany

[barman]

There were actually reports I remember where these perverts purposely went up to children and engaged in sexual acts infront of them, with police watching. And they were protected by law. Flat out disgusting what happens at these "fairs".

Anecdotal reports are Fun!

Meanwhile, a pox on the parents of any kids who were taken to within eyesight of such an event.

Next thing you know, they'll be taking their kids to nude beaches and then making internet blog posts talking about how "the people on those beaches were just flaunting it in front of our innocent little cherubs!!"

 

[barman]

My own biggest complaint with the link that ZIT posted which had all the male dick sucking photos is that not one of them had any hot looking guys.

It was nearly 100% 60+ year old biker looking dudes.

Hey...if you're going to point me to some gay porn, mix in a few dudes that I can show to the SheBar.

 

[SayHeyKid]

Anecdotal reports are Fun!

Meanwhile, a pox on the parents of any kids who were taken to within eyesight of such an event.

Next thing you know, they'll be taking their kids to nude beaches and then making internet blog posts talking about how "the people on those beaches were just flaunting it in front of our innocent little cherubs!!"

Anecodotal reports? Did you see the link ZIT posted of men ejaculating out windows onto public streets/people, engaging in unprotected sex acts with random strangers, and naked men walking around openly on public streets. You think it's acceptable for promiscuous most likely STD positive gay men to be ejaculating onto bystanders out windows? hno:

And yes there were reports when this first came out about children witnessing these peversions. Hell, it took place on a public street which was sorrunded by apartments. What goes on at these "parades" is flat out disgusting and is a prime example of why so many people have a problem with gays.

I judge people as individuals, not lump them into groups. However, is it any surprise why so many folks have a grudge against homosexuals after witnessing this behavior?

 

[barman]

You might just as well get hot and bothered by Mardi Gras in New Orleans, Gasparilla in Tampa or any other number of annual parties that are held across the nation.

At each of those parties which take place on public streets with full sanction of the local authorities, people engage in all manner of debauchery, drunkeness, lewd behavior etc. (With most of it being carried out by heterosexuals of course)

And anyone who lives in those communities knows well in advance when they will be happening. Those who are sufficiently riled by the events are free to do one of two things

1) Lobby with local officials to have the events cancelled and/or not permitted (very difficult for constitutional reasons)

2) Move out of those communities and into somewhere else within the 99.99% of the USA where such events do not occur on public streets.

 

[barman]

SHK: Did you see the link ZIT posted of men ejaculating out windows onto public streets/people

Bar: Anyone walking on those streets during that event would have to be an utter fool to do so without knowing they were in a no-holds barred party zone. Thus they are implicitly agreeing that they might encounter absolute debauchery and should proceed accordingly.

SHK:, engaging in unprotected sex acts with random strangers

Bar: Absolutely no concern of you, me or anyone else.

SHK: , and naked men walking around openly on public streets

Bar: Oh No!

SHK: You think it's acceptable for promiscuous most likely STD positive gay men to be ejaculating onto bystanders out windows?

Bar: You are presuming both the presence of STD and the level of promiscuity, but that aside, see my first note above. You walk into that zone during those few hours of the year, don't come out crying that you saw, heard or even felt something offensive.

Same way I'm less than interested when someone says they went to see the Gasparilla parade in Tampa (or the Guavaween parade) - an annual event that goes down public residential streets. And where the goal for most parade attendees is to get as drunk as physically possible, where women of all ages take off their shirts and/or lift their shirts and show their to the crowds of adults and children - and suddenly the observer expresses outrage.

"Those women are just showing their breasts to my young children!!"

please

It happens every year. The police don't arrest any of the women; arrests for public intoxication are almost non-existent given the thousands of smashed people. Foul language rains through the air.

If there's any component which might potentially offend someone, they're best served to just stay away. Or if they happen to live in one of the residences along the parade route (or within the Mardi Gras zone or any other such designated party zone), probably best to stay the hell indoors.

If so inclined, read your Bible and pray a lot until the event is over.

And everyone lives Happily Ever After.

:drink:

 

[SayHeyKid]

I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest an individual who exposes himself to hundreds of people and then ejaculates onto bystanders before retreating to an apartment room full of naked men is promiscuous.

As for your comparisons to Mardi Gars and other parades, they are erroneous. First of all, although women showing their breasts in public isn't legal in Louisiana, but it actually is legal in a handful of states and by law isn't in comparison with showing dicks/pussys. If anything below the waist is exposed and a LEO sees it, you will be arrested at ANY other parade. Let alone having public sex orgies in broad daylight on public streets.


I'm not sure how you can defend this behavior. What goes on at these parties is flat out sickning. At a private/beach, or secluded area? sure. However, little children shouldn't be subjected to looking out their window to people having sex.

 

[Preussen]

"complete inability or unwillingness to have any kind of rational debate"

Blatant lie #1. And, everyone on here knows it.

"You are just a troll..."

Blatant lie #2, but ad hominem attack to be expected from Preussen,
I was waiting for it, and predicted it.

When was the last time you had a rational discussion in here, choosing an appropriate thread title and actually listening to other's arguments with an open mind? Hate-spewing is not rational debate.

 

[barman]

I'm not sure how you can defend this behavior. What goes on at these parties is flat out sickning. At a private/beach, or secluded area? sure. However, little children shouldn't be subjected to looking out their window to people having sex.

It's less a matter of my "defending" the behavior as much as it is a simple concession on my part that it's none of my damn business since I don't live in that particular neighborhood in San Francisco.

If the residents of that community with children are not able to persaude city officials to rein in the cited behavior, then they're going to have to live with it.

It would seem clear that if this event has been taking place for a number of years that the strong majority of residents are pretty much okey dokey with it. And anyone in the community who is NOT okay with it is thus pretty much confronted with a choice of ignoring the day's events or relocating out of that community.

 

[barman]

Is it really a crime in Louisiana for a women to bare her breasts?

holy cow

I mean, I know that electric vibrating dildoes are illegal in Alabama, but hey......Aren't we in the 21st century most everywhere else?

 

[festeringZit]

When was the last time you had a rational discussion in here, choosing an appropriate thread title and actually listening to other's arguments with an open mind? Hate-spewing is not rational debate.

You disappear for a couple months, and then come back and immediately
accuse me of not engaging in rational discussion. That makes you
the troll.

 

[Preussen]

I come back after a few months and the first things I see from you are two threads with obviously incorrect, provocative thread titles, just the type you have been creating all the time. When I point this out you accuse me of "lame rhethorics". None of the threads contain any sensible response from you to other posts, just more hate against your target of choice, just as it has been in the past. Forgive me if I'm not impressed.

 

[festeringZit]

I come back after a few months and the first things I see from you are two threads with obviously incorrect, provocative thread titles, just the type you have been creating all the time. When I point this out you accuse me of "lame rhethorics". None of the threads contain any sensible response from you to other posts, just more hate against your target of choice, just as it has been in the past. Forgive me if I'm not impressed.

You are a liar and a troll.

Here is a thread I posted
within the last week on here to facilitate discussion on democracy:


Democracy Bound to Fail?
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=684526

 

[festeringZit]

Preussen,

Actually if you did a simple search on thread titles you'd see that
most of them aren't even close to being inflammatory.

 

[quantumleap]

Perhaps Zit should have had a disclaimer:

"California Turning into Nazi Germany"

(Disclaimer: thread title is in reference to fascists in power of Germany during its Nazi period and not intended to be reflective of any Germans past or present who did not subscribe to fascist doctrines.)

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Perhaps Zit should have had a disclaimer:

"California Turning into Nazi Germany"

(Disclaimer: thread title is in reference to fascists in power of Germany during its Nazi period and not intended to be reflective of any Germans past or present who did not subscribe to fascist doctrines.)

Nah, that wouldn’t have stopped Preussen.

 

[Preussen]

Nah, that wouldn’t have stopped Preussen.

Indeed it wouldn't have, because that's not what is problematic about this thread title.

 

[Preussen]

Preussen,

Actually if you did a simple search on thread titles you'd see that
most of them aren't even close to being inflammatory.

I never claimed all your thread titles are inflammatory. But it's a fact that your newest two threads, the only ones I got to read recently (California=Nazi Germany and 35 states vs. Obama) both have very inappropriate titles. Combined with what I know from you in the past this is enough to keep my opinion about you - that you are completely agenda-driven.

 

[tiznow]

commufascism rules!!

@)

 

[tiznow]

Perhaps Zit should have had a disclaimer:

"California Turning into Nazi Germany"

(Disclaimer: thread title is in reference to fascists in power of Germany during its Nazi period and not intended to be reflective of any Germans past or present who did not subscribe to fascist doctrines.)

@)

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Indeed it wouldn't have, because that's not what is problematic about this thread title.

:lol: Thanks for the confirmation.