SMU - They are recruiting very well for SMU. Their numbers are up and they are much more talented that they were a few years back. With that being said, they are still incredibly young from an experience perspective, and they just are not very big physically. I hope to see more of them when the camp starts. They are going to score points but I think they will struggle against teams that just line up and punch them in the gut because of their lack of size. I also see them having trouble consistently being able to run the ball between the tackles.Win One, you are right there...what's the take on SMU for the coming season?
I'm also liking WV this year. They are on the "good year" of their Big 12 scheduling with TCU, OU and Baylor all at home. Definitely top 5 potential. They also catch TTU in a bit of a sandwich spot. That will be a big game for them if they want to move into the top 5. With an experienced QB like Skyler Howard I like their chances of pulling off a couple of road wins..
they are 2 or 3 over limit right now which means they will need to convince a couple to transfer outCan someone tell me how UTexas can add 5+ scholarship players from the Baylor roster at this late date. Typically, aren't most of those scholarships accounted for? Unless you have some attrition, I don't know how you make the numbers work.
Stidham has left Baylor and heading the JUCO route for 1 year for his redshirt season of top level ball. Very rare route to take but gives him 3 years left for FBS football and Baylor cannot stop him from transferring to another B12 school. If he would have transferred straight to another B12 school he would only have 2 years of eligibility left...found himself a loophole for in-conference transfer it seemsBaylor's backup QB, Jarrett Stidham (#4 dual-threat QB in 2015), has requested full release with aTm the likely transfer destination although auburn and oregon are also possibilities
Bill Snyder says two former teams want back in the Big 12. Colorado and Nebraska. Both schools lost their main recruiting base in Texas when leaving. I would take them both back in a heartbeat. But I think the chances of them leaving their conferences are pretty slim. Especially Nebraska. What do you think RunLee? To me it looks like Nebraska is starting to recruit pretty well again...I don't see them leaving. Hard to see Nebraska and Texas in the same conference again after what's happened...
http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...2/big-12-expansion-candidates-colorado-whaaat
The only school in the SEC who is better off is A$M. But they are just doing now what they should have been doing all along in the Big 12. Missouri is the school that's out of place. It was a very hasty decision in leaving the Big 12. The SEC is just a bad cultural fit for them, and they don't have the recruiting base nor the bagmen to be competitive in the SEC. I think they reached their peak in the first year in the league, and will become a 6-9 win team that maybe wins their division every decade. They are basically the second Kentucky in the SEC minus the basketball championships. The trouble with Mizzou is they've always fancied themselves as one of the elite teams. You know this better than anybody Run since they were big North rivals with Nebraska before they left. But they've never lived up to their own expectations. And now they are in a conference where they are going to be finishing in the middle of the pack every year. So they are now stuck between a rock and a hard place. What do they want more, a chance to win a championship or the money? The problem is once you start getting your hands on a lot of money, it's hard to give that up. So greed will most likely win out...Colorado would probably have the best chance at coming back since they aren't really much better off in the Pac-12 than they are now. But all of these teams left for a reason. That's why it's going to be hard to get any of them back...I have a hard time seeing Nebraska returning to a Texas dominant conference (the whole nostalgic draw centers on OU, btw). Perhaps some higher-ups could talk Nebraska in to letting Texas join the Big Ten if that was the momentum. The money coming from the Big Ten in not only athletics but research grant money is too much to pass on. But I wouldn't be surprised if certain boosters have expressed nostalgia. Like you said, Nebraska is starting to recruit at a high level, pretty amazing really and is putting some kabosh on some theories that it can't be done given the location. I've mentioned before that recruiting is about relationships. California has always provided more recruits to Nebraska than the state of Texas and now that is beginning to expanded with the California ties of the current staff. The Calibraska movement is going strong....back on point. If I had to guess, I'd say Bill is talking about Colorado and Missouri. I'm sure all for programs have some buyers remorse. I'd toss my hat in on Missouri feeling out of place more than TAM or NU. Missouri has always thought highly of their institution, which is why they wanted the Big Ten. I think both TAM and NU have enough disdain for the Longhorns that it isn't them. Then Snyder might just be bullshiting us. Maybe he's helping the conference out in a potential negotiation position with any of the "real" candidates.
That's another problem. I don't see any of these schools paying the GOR to come back to a shaky conference where basically nothing has changed since they left...Wouldn't Colorado have to pay exorbitant exit fees to leave the PAC-12? They just gone done paying the Big 12 exit fees so I really doubt that would fly with the athletic department and university officials, although it would not surprise me if there are some coaches are others around the football program that would prefer the Big 12, but I don't think its even remotely feasible. Maybe that old bird Snyder is getting senile and confused them with Colorado State, who desperately wants to join the Big 12. They do have a new stadium going up in Fort Collins, but still probably a long shot. Sounds like the current candidates are: Connecticut, Cincinnati, UCF, Memphis, Colorado State and Houston.
http://www.denverpost.com/2016/07/20/colorado-state-among-suitors-to-join-big-12-conference/
I doubt CSU gets a Big 12 invite, although I could one day see them in the PAC-12 as that's how that conference was setup with two schools from each state (Washington, Oregon, No Cal, So Cal, Arizona). Not sure there are a whole lot of sexy candidates out west, Boise, Byu, etc all have their issues.
I've always said UCF is a potential sleeping giant because of the size of the school. And I've heard they have a pretty strong alumni base.. We could do a lot worse than bringing them in. Especially since they are located in a prime recruiting area. Cincy has pretty much been at the top of most people's list since the beginning of these expansion rumors. Plus they are a school who has made a concerted effort to grow their athletic programs, including football. That will probably hold a lot of weight with the Big 12 brass. BYU is probably talked about on the OU boards more than any school because of their fan base, stadium size, they've been competitive on a national level, etc. But the elephant in the room is still their religion. I'm not sure if they can or will be able to work around it. Some think if we were to take BYU, they would also want another school out west to come with them like a CSU. And expand the conference to 14 teams from 10 with the addition of Cincy and UCF or Memphis or possibly UConn. I would rather have 14 teams if we were to expand...I guess Id lobby for UCF and Cincy. Get those two states for recruiting and tv.