mvbski said:FROM SBR
SBR John’s opinion on WWTS
<hr style="color: rgb(51, 102, 153);" size="1"><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->In a word or two: Extremely disappointed
We have been in talks with the WWTS and will continue to be. In the meantime, we have pulled them off or will be pulling them off our sites as soon as humanly possible.
SBR recognizes these are difficult times. However, there is no legal reason to deny players access to their funds.
WWTS has shown utter incompetence with malice at the highest levels to arrive at a day where their players are denied access to their funds.
Vegas Player 777 said:This from Gambling911 at 6:47 pm today. Please note the update in red:
((snip))
Important Update:
An announcement will be forthcoming first thing Monday morning. Three groups are vying to purchase BetCorp's key US facing brands. The company is in a transition period over the weekend and US bettors will be able to use BetWWTS.com once again starting this week.
Gambling911.com has been in touch with management and feel there is absolutely no reason for concern.
updated 6;47 pm ET
Vegas Player 777 said:One more thing for BetWWTS customers:
One thing is certain...whoever buys WWTS is most definitely planning to stay in the offshore business with the US. Existing customers may very likely find themselves with a solid book after all.
mvbski said:FROM SBR
SBR John’s opinion on WWTS
<HR style="COLOR: #336699" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->In a word or two: Extremely disappointed
We have been in talks with the WWTS and will continue to be. In the meantime, we have pulled them off or will be pulling them off our sites as soon as humanly possible.
SBR recognizes these are difficult times. However, there is no legal reason to deny players access to their funds.
WWTS has shown utter incompetence with malice at the highest levels to arrive at a day where their players are denied access to their funds.
sean1 said:You people are acting crazy.
This company can not steal your funds and remain a publicly traded company in London - they would be delisted.
Most likely they are doing two things:
1. Trying to sell the US portion.
2. Figuring out how to transfer the people in the US their money without breaking any laws that could get it delisted or make their execs criminals.
It was 6PM in London when Bush signed this law.
How about giving them till Monday to figure things out with their lawyers.
I mean seriously, if a law changed at 6PM here in the states on a Friday, Bank of America would not give you an answer at midnight - you'd find out on Monday.
Trying to talk reason into unreasonable people is like trying to reason with hurricane season.
Sean
sean1 said:WWTS did not handle this well. They should have posted we'll have an update on Monday.
But it was 2AM Saturday morning in Australia where they are located when the bill was signed.
If a bill went into effect at 2AM Sat about Bank of America, when do you think Bank of America would comment?
Sean
sean1 said:WWTS did not handle this well. They should have posted we'll have an update on Monday.
But it was 2AM Saturday morning in Australia where they are located when the bill was signed.
If a bill went into effect at 2AM Sat about Bank of America, when do you think Bank of America would comment?
Sean
gbogo said:so now the question is given the value of the company just went down 60-70% how much money can they actually repay.