Anti Immigration & Illegal Immigration Info - Ongoing Thread

[Coldweather]

I truly believe there is an easy soultion to this here matter. I have already expressed it so I will not repeat it again. I am stymied that my soultion has not be embraced by members of this here forum!

hno:

 

[rodomonte]

I live in Arizona, which is now being boycotted by all of California's largest cities as well as some smaller ones.

I will retaliate by boycotting California fruits and nuts.

 

[roadreeler57]

I live in Arizona, which is now being boycotted by all of California's largest cities as well as some smaller ones.

I will retaliate by boycotting California fruits and nuts.

I see a double meaning in that remark....You won't be inviting any California Libs over for supper anytime soon either rite?...I see a retaliation & Arizona making more money than they would have before this so called boycott but you probably won't see it in the mainstream media..Thanks for the reply my friend from Reno Nevada...

 

[roadreeler57]

Sorry aout that Rodomonte...There must be a Reno Ariz.

 

[roadreeler57]

I truly believe there is an easy soultion to this here matter. I have already expressed it so I will not repeat it again. I am stymied that my soultion has not be embraced by members of this here forum!

hno:

I know what remark you are referring to...But then again what other Country does Arizona border?

 

[rodomonte]

Sorry aout that Rodomonte...There must be a Reno Ariz.

No. I moved from Reno to Arizona 7 months ago to get closer to the "action." I just updated my profile to reflect that.

Keep up the good work, my friend.

 

[roadreeler57]

Is it just a movie or is it?

<TABLE style="WIDTH: 600px" border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=600><TBODY><TR><TD width="100%" align=left><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 10px" border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" align=left xcomment="styleclass=style_MainText">[FONT=Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]Friends of ALIPAC,

Less than one hour after we released the trailer of the new movie, CURRENTLY IN THEATERS, called Machete FOX corporation had YouTube pull every copy from view!

Our release about the anti-American film Machete a few hours ago...
WARNING: Tensions Rise Across America
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-198510.html


YouTube reads "This video contains content from FOX, who has blocked it on copyright grounds."

We need immediate help.

Any of you that have the ability to locate and download a copy of the trailer with the threat against Arizona, please get a copy to help ALIPAC upload it somewhere that they cannot censor it.

They do NOT WANT AMERICANS to see this video.

We are alerting our entire media list as well.

Here is a copy that is still on the web for now at this link...

Rapidly vanishing trailer for anti-American film Machete
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/44943

or here

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2010/05/06/2010-05-06_robert_rodriguez_cut s_illegal_trailer_for_machete_to_protest_arizona_immigration.html


We call on all Americans to help us get copies of this video, upload it where FOX and YouTube cannot censor it and to get information about this film to all Americans.

The ALIPAC Team
www.alipac.us
AMERICANS FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION PAC
Post Office Box 30966, Raleigh, NC 27622-0966
Tel: (919) 787-6009 Toll Free: (866) 703-0864
FEC ID: C00405878

 

[roadreeler57]

<TABLE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 10px" id=content_LETTER.BLOCK4 border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" align=left styleclass="style_MainText">[FONT=Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]
Friends of ALIPAC,

It takes a great deal to get my blood pressure up these days after all of the horror I've witnessed due to illegal immigration and the fact our own government has been hijacked at the top!

But today, I ask you to watch and listen carefully and understand what these new stories mean for us all.

First, please do not post or circulate the protest sign that reads "We will shoot more police in Arizona till we get free?" We cannot prove that is a fake, but several of our supporting activists feel the picture is a hoax and has been altered. You can see our full discussions here and make your own determination. Our ruling is that the sign is problematic and we cannot document a source, therefore it should not be further circulated.

Sign discussion at this link
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-197478.html


With that out of the way, we need to do our best to make sure everyone in America knows about and understands what just happened with two stories.

In California, students wearing clothing with American flags were sent home while students wearing Mexican flags were allowed to stay in class. It is my strong personal opinion that school administrators sent the Hispanic kids wearing American flags home because of the clear and present danger of violence against them.

The next day, many of the Mexican kids walked out to protest the insult they felt the kids wearing American flags had delivered by wearing such a "racist" symbol as the American flag.

At another school, a kid is in trouble for tearing down a Mexican flag and we are receiving word of another story where someone burned a Mexican flag in or near school.

War may be upon us in our own land and our school children may be on the front lines.

IF THESE STORIES DO NOT MAKE IT CLEAR TO OUR FELLOW AMERICANS WHAT WE FACE THEN I DO NOT KNOW WHAT WILL!

Story Details at...
Five Students Wearing U.S. Flag Shirts Sent Home
http://www.alipac.us/article-5232-thread-1-0.html

Mexican flag display causes flap at Klein Collins High
http://www.alipac.us/article-5236-thread-1-0.html


While we try not to put to much in one e-mail, because we know our busy supporters will not always read to the end, I hope you are still reading.

We regret to inform everyone that Hollywood just released a movie into theaters on the weekend of Cinco de Mayo that glorifies and encourages illegal aliens to take up arms against Americans.

While some will claim this movie is a spoof, you need to watch the trailer yourself.

The movie is about an illegal alien that gets double crossed after accepting a commission to murder an American politician that is driving illegal aliens out of our country.

The protagonists then lead an army of machete and AK-47 wielding illegal aliens in a violent uprising. In Central and South America, the machete is a symbol of violent revolt.

Many of us are greatly concerned that the introduction of this propaganda film, at this time, with the specific threat against the state of Arizona could greatly increase the chances of violent harm against Americans by illegal aliens.

Here is the trailer of the film...
MACHETE "Illegal" Trailer X HD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmjcFBquzo4


Please spread the word far and wide about these items.

If you would like to comment about any of these items, please do so at ALIPAC via this link...
http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1057510.html#1057510



Sincerely,


William Gheen
President of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC ALIPAC
www.alipac.us
[/FONT]</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

 

[roadreeler57]

Sign the Petition

http://www.numbersusa.com/petition?ID=15 20257 citizens have signed!

 

[roadreeler57]

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7Wm7ub60KAI&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7Wm7ub60KAI&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> Arizona TV Ads Push Immigration Cuts & Enforcement (elevator)

 

[roadreeler57]

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5U4tI_qzyH0&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5U4tI_qzyH0&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[roadreeler57]

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iybaDyMr1rs&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iybaDyMr1rs&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[SwoleBonds]

 

[roadreeler57]

Two Years After Strict Immigration Reform, Oklahoma Is More Than OK




The state's economy is far outperforming most of the country, and it appears to trace back to the passage of their illegal immigrant crackdown.

May 14, 2010
- by Tom Blumer
<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->Share | http://therxforums.com//www.addthis...orm, Oklahoma Is More Than OK&content=&lng=enhttp://therxforums.com//www.addthis...orm, Oklahoma Is More Than OK&content=&lng=enhttp://therxforums.com//www.addthis...orm, Oklahoma Is More Than OK&content=&lng=en

<SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#username=pajamasmedia"></SCRIPT><!-- AddThis Button END -->


<!--IFRAME Tag // Tag for network 5235: Intermarkets // Website: Pajamas Media // Page: SecondLevel // Placement: Pajamas_Media_SecondLevel_Middle_Left_300x250 (1142577) // created at: Nov 16, 2009 4:46:55 PM --><!-- End of IFRAME Tag -->
Given the economic damage inflicted on us by the current administration and many state governments, most readers of this column would probably be quite happy to live in a state where:

• The official unemployment rate in March was 6.6%.
• The average unemployment rate in 2009 using the most comprehensive definition was 10.5%, the fourth-lowest in the nation (behind three much smaller states), and far lower than the national average of 16.2%.
• The number of people either working or looking for work has actually grown during the past twelve months (in most states, the labor force has contracted significantly).
• The economy grew in 2008, and probably did so again in 2009.
​

Unless you live in Oklahoma, you’re not in that state.
It “just so happens” that the Sooner State passed a strict immigration enforcement measure in May 2007, which went into effect six months later. Specifically:

House Bill 1804 was passed by overwhelming majorities in both the House and Senate of the Oklahoma legislature. The measure’s sponsor, State Representative Randy Terrill, says the bill has four main topical areas: it deals with identity theft; it terminates public assistance benefits to illegals; it empowers state and local police to enforce federal immigration laws; and it punishes employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens.
Oklahoma is no longer “O.K.” for illegal aliens, Terrill observes. “When you put everything together in context,” he contends, “the bottom line is illegal aliens will not come here if there are no jobs waiting for them, they will not stay here if there is no government subsidy, and they certainly won’t stay here if they know that if they ever encounter our state and local law enforcement officers, they will be physically detained until they’re deported. And that’s exactly what House Bill 1804 does.”
​

An amazing animated graphic (still available at The Mess That Greenspan Made) shows what happened in the immediate wake of 1804’s passage. It shows month-by-month changes in the unemployment rate for each state in the lower 48 states. From March 2007 to March 2008, alone among all states, Oklahoma’s unemployment rate fell significantly, especially in the final few months of the 12-month period presented — the first few months after 1804 went into effect.
Coincidence? Well, if fewer jobs are available to illegals, you would expect that lesser-skilled individuals shut out of the labor market by low, often under-the-table wages would be in a position to take them. Sadly, blacks and Hispanics in this country and in Oklahoma are likely to be disproportionately represented among the lesser-skilled, so looking at those groups’ unemployment rates will serve as a useful proxy.
Here are the facts:

Newly released numbers for 2009 show the unemployment rate for black Oklahomans is 11.1 percent, compared with 5 percent for whites and 7.4 percent for Hispanics. In 2008, black unemployment in the state was 8.7 percent, while the rate for whites was 2.9 percent and the rate for Hispanics was 9 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
​

Shannon Muchmore at the Tulsa World had a reaction that was sadly and predictably ignorant:

The unemployment rate for black people in Oklahoma is twice as high as the rate for white people, and Hispanics face a similar disparity that exists regardless of education, training, or experience, data show.
​

Just a minute, Ms. Muchmore.
The 2.4% increase in the black unemployment rate from 2008 to 2009 was barely more than the 2.1% increase for whites; the “twice as high” degree of difference between the two rates (actually 2.2 times as high) was down from three times as high the year before. The unemployment rate for Hispanics went not up, but down, by 1.6%. Nationally, from December 2008 to December 2009, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for blacks and Hispanics increased 4.1% and 3.5%, respectively.
I’d say this is evidence that lesser-skilled Oklahomans have been quite willing to take the “jobs that Americans won’t do.”
While in the neighborhood, I’ll note that perhaps the knee-jerk elitist stereotypes about race- and ethnicity-based discrimination in the heartland need to be revisited. If 1804 isn’t the reason Oklahoma has vastly outperformed most of the country, someone will have to try to explain what is.
Not that those who oppose any kind of immigration enforcement legislation are impressed. In an April 28, 2010, Christian Science Monitor opinion piece, Sally Kohn rolled out this startling claim about 1804:

One study suggests the bill led to an estimated 50,000 people fleeing Oklahoma and a 1.3 percent drop in economic output statewide. As a result, Oklahoma may well have incurred $1.8 billion in economic losses, just as it, like the rest of the nation, was bracing for recession.
​

Hmm, that’s funny … Uncle Sam’s Bureau of Economic Analysis reports that the state’s economy grew by 2.7% in 2008, a performance that puts it in the top ten among all states in a year when the national economy only grew by 0.4%. Additionally, information from the Census Bureau shows that the state’s population increased by just under 75,000, or 2%, between July 2007 and July 2009 — in line with the country as a whole. If those results are “painful,” I wonder how Ms. Kohn would characterize what’s going on in Michigan and California?
The Sooner State’s economic indicators are comparatively positive just about anywhere one looks. Per capita personal income in Oklahoma grew 2.8% between 2007 and 2009; nationally, it fell by 0.7%. The state’s already puny welfare caseload dropped by 11% in 2007 to under 19,000, and stayed there until June 2009. The number of SNAP/Food Stamp recipients in Oklahoma fell in both 2007 and 2008 by a combined 3.8% while rising 6.5% nationally.Loosened eligibility rules allowing those who don’t really need them and even college-aged children of the well-off to qualify have since made the SNAP/Food Stamp program an unreliable indicator of the true extent of poverty. Oklahoma does have a budget problem that bears watching, but so does the large majority of other states.
The aforementioned Ms. Kohn’s characterization of Oklahoma’s economy as “littered with crumbling farms and factories and aging populations who feel that any prospect of prosperity is passing them by” seems more than a little overwrought and offensively arrogant.
Since 1804 passed, Oklahoma has not suffered nearly as much economically as most of the rest of the U.S. In fact, the state can fairly be described, especially on a relative basis, as prosperous. Even before considering the reductions in crime the citizens of Arizona are so desperately seeking in their state’s new immigration enforcement measure, what the Sooner State has done seems well worth imitating elsewhere for pocketbook-related reasons alone.
As to the legal and moral dimensions of limiting illegal immigration, I would suggest that the hand-wringers first aim their critiques at other countries which deal much more harshly with trespassers — starting with Mexico. http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/two-ye...orm-oklahoma-is-more-than-ok/?singlepage=true

 

[roadreeler57]

Trackbacks

1. The Snooper Report
2. PAXALLES
3. Target Rich Environment » Mexican Government Doing the Job American Government Won’t On Illegal Aliens
4. Will Nancy Pelosi call Mexico’s Laws on illegal immigration an outrage? « DaTechguy's Blog
5. Sister Toldjah
6. The Other Unsecured Border « Vets On The Watch
7. Police state: How Mexico treats illegal aliens (Excellent Column By Michelle Malkin) « ~ THE GUNNY "G" BLOGS ~
8. BizzyBlog
9. Immigration Laws: Corporate HR Departments to Enforce « Finding Ponies…
10. JANUS must rule AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW! « Temple of Mut
11. Mexican president condemns Arizona immigrant law « Mcnorman's Weblog
12. MSM's Tale of 2 Protests: Immigration vs. Tea Party - Political Wrinkles
13. Crackdown on Illegal Immigration Gains Steam in…Massachusetts | The American Pundit
14. Double Standard of "Comical Proportions"
15. Lead and gold
16. Blame For The Mortgage Crisis Should Be Put Where It Belongs – In The Dems’ Lap
17. Fausta’s Blog » Blog Archive » Mexico’s illegal alien laws
18. Police state: How Mexico treats illegal aliens - INGunOwners
19. Villainous Company
20. How Mexico handles illegal immigrants - Political Forum
21. Rhymes With Right
22. Can We Just Have Mexico’s Immigration Laws? | EyeHackerBlog.com
23. “Whose country is this, anyway?” « DPGI
24. Police state: How Mexico treats illegal aliens « Keith D. Milby :: blog
25. 4-28-2010 The Weekly Claw - AllMilitary.com's Military Blog
26. Anti-anti-lawbreaking protest signs « The TrogloPundit
27. BizzyBlog
28. Bookworm Room » The passive aggressive selfishness and racism of the open borders crowd *UPDATED*
29. The Angry White Guy » Blog Archive » Hey Obama, shut up and read the law before you open your pie hole!
30. Must Know Headlines 4.29.2010 — ExposeTheMedia.com
31. Let’s adopt the same immigration laws as Mexico « Right Minded Online
32. My Picks « The Augur’s Well
33. Police state: How Mexico treats illegal aliens « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian
34. What does Arizona’s immigration enforcement bill really say? « Wintery Knight
35. The Politics Of Ugly: Arizona, Immigration, Obama’s Birth Certificate, Rezko, Cap And Trade, Jobs, – And The Beautiful Hillary Clinton — Hillary Is 44
36. Democrats Conceptual Proposal For Immigration Reform: New Amnesty Bill «
37. Mexican hypocrisy: Abuses of their own illegals enshrined in Constitution « Seeing Red AZ
38. How does Mexico treat IT'S illegal immigrants? - The Liberty Lounge Political Forums
39. Obama Was “Inaccurate” About AZ Law, While Left Continues to Purposely Misrepresent the Bill, and ‘Buy Arizona!’ Movement Begins « Gospel of Jesus Christ, The Gift of Eternal Life
40. Hypocritical California Government Boycotts Against Arizona Over Immigration Law | OpenMarket.org
41. Hey, Maybe the US Really DOES Have Something to Learn from Mexico! | The Marmot's Hole
42. MAY 5th: ARIZONA MONEY BOMB DAY! « Temple of Mut
43. A Response to Linda Greenhouse…. | hillbillypolitics.com
44. A Response to Linda Greenhouse…. | RedState
45. Cold Fury » Papers? Please.
46. Arizona signs anti-immigration into law - Page 14 - Sportbikes.net
47. I Don't Think He Read the Bill - Page 2 - XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source!
48. THE UNION OF SOUTH AMERICAN NATIONS (UNASUR) UPSET THAT ARIZONA MAY LIMIT INFLUX OF USAN’S POVERTY – suzyrice.com
49. Michelle Malkin » Lester Kinsolving: White House press corps pit bull
50. Lester Kinsolving: White House press corps pit bull | Western Journalism.com
51. ARIZONA SB1070: Short Analysis (and Amendment HB2162) « FactReal
52. Red Herring - Arizona immigration law | RedState
53. Video: Protests In AZ Getting Increasingly Ugly – Where’s MSM? « Nice Deb
54. Maggie's Farm

Trackback URL http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/28/police-state-how-mexico-treats-illegal-aliens/

 

[roadreeler57]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/27/hezbollah-uses-mexican-drug-routes-into-us/

 

[roadreeler57]

Joe Arpaio Deputies just busted up a large cockfighting ring out west. I am hearing 40 in custody possibly undocumented.


<FORM id=commentable_item_1934556225_119598064737741 class="commentable_item one_row_add_box autoexpand_mode comment_form_119598064737741" onsubmit=";var d = document.documentElement;return d.onsubmit && d.onsubmit(event);" method=post name=add_comment action=/ajax/ufi/modify.php ajaxify="1"><A title="" onclick="" href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Joe-Arpaio/108536052520558?v=wall&story_fbid=119598064737741&ref=mf" target=""><ABBR class=timestamp title="Sat, 15 May 2010 18:45:40 -0700">11 hours ago</ABBR> · <LABEL class=comment_link title="Click here to leave a comment" onclick="return fc_expand(this);">Comment</LABEL> ·· <LABEL class=feedback_show_link title="Show comments and other feedback" onclick='CSS.toggleClass(this.form, "collapsed_comments")'>View Feedback (466)</LABEL><LABEL class=feedback_hide_link title="" onclick='CSS.toggleClass(this.form, "collapsed_comments")'>Hide Feedback (466)</LABEL>

You and 343 others like this.


View all 122 comments



</FORM>

 

[roadreeler57]

Election 2010: Indiana Senate
Indiana Senate: Coats (R) 51%, Ellsworth (D) 36%

Friday, May 07, 2010

Email to a Friend<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> SHARETHIS.addEntry( ** title: "Election 2010: Indiana Senate", url: 'http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/indiana/election_2010_indiana_senate' }); </SCRIPT> ShareThis




Newly chosen Republican nominee Dan Coats earns 51% support while his Democratic rival Brad Ellsworth’s attracts 36% in the first Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of the Indiana Senate race following Tuesday’s GOP Primary.
Six percent (6%) of likely voters in the state favor some other candidate. Eight percent (8%) remain undecided.
Coats, who previously served in the U.S. Senate from 1989 to 1999, captured 39% of the vote in a five-way race on Tuesday to win the state Republican Senate nomination. His four opponents have now endorsed his candidacy. Ellsworth, a U.S. congressman, is unchallenged for his party’s nomination.
In surveys since Democratic Senator Evan Bayh’s surprise announcement that he would not seek reelection, Coat’s support in match-ups with Ellsworth has grown from 46%in Februaryto 54% last month. Ellsworth’s support in those same surveys has remained in the narrow range of 32% to 34%.
Ellsworth voted in favor of the recently-passed national health care plan, but 59% of Indiana voters favor repeal of that plan. The Indiana finding includes 48% who Strongly Favor repeal. Thirty-eight percent (38%) oppose repeal, with 26% who Strongly Oppose it. Those figures are similar to the national average.
Eighty-one percent (81%) of those who Strongly Favor repeal support Coats, while 80% of those in the smaller group who Strongly Oppose it support Ellsworth.
(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.
The survey of 500 Likely Voters in Indiana was conducted on May 5-6, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.
Thirteen percent (13%) of Indiana voters have a Very Favorable opinion of Coats, while nine percent (9%) regard him Very Unfavorably.
Ellsworth is seen Very Favorably by nine percent (9%) and Very Unfavorably by 13%.
At this point in a campaign, Rasmussen Reports considers the number of people with a strong opinion more significant than the total favorable/unfavorable numbers.
Sixty-one percent (61%) of Indiana voters support a law like Arizona’s that authorizes local police to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being an illegal immigrant. Twenty-nine percent (29%) oppose such a law. Again, those figures are close to the national average.
But 52% of voters in Indiana are at least somewhat concerned that such a law will violate the civil rights of some U.S. citizens. Forty-seven percent (47%) are not very or not at all concerned.
Sixty-five percent (65%) favor a welcoming immigration policy that excludes only “national security threats, criminals and those who would come here to live off our welfare system.”
Most Indiana voters think it is at least somewhat important for Congress to pass energy legislation this year to reduce global warming, but just 38% favor such an energy bill now. Forty-one percent (41%) oppose it.
Most voters know the GOP has been identified as the Party of No for its unified opposition to President Obama’s legislative agenda, but they’re narrowly divided over whether that’s a good place for the Republicans to be.
In line with the view among voters nationally, 65% in Indiana say America is overtaxed.
Forty-three percent (43%) of voters in the state approve of how Obama is handling the role of president, up four points from a month ago. Fifty-six percent (56%) disapprove. Indiana voters are more critical of Obama’s job performance than voters nationwide in the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll.
Again this month, 60% approve of how Republican Governor Mitch Daniels is doing his job. Thirty-eight percent (38%) disapprove.
In 2008, Rasmussen Reports projected nationally that Obama would defeat McCain by a 52% to 46% margin. Obama won 53% to 46%. Four years earlier, Rasmussen Reports projected the national vote totals for both George W. Bush and John Kerry within half-a-percentage-point.
In Indiana during the 2008 campaign, Rasmussen Reports polling showed a close race with McCain edging Obama 49% to 46%. Obama won 50% to 49%. In the Democratic Primary, Rasmussen Polling showed Hillary Clinton defeating Obama 46% to 41%. Clinton won 51% to 49%.
See all Rasmussen Reports 2008 state results for president, Senate and governor. See 2006 results for Senate and governor. See 2004 state results for president.
Rasmussen Reports has recently surveyed Senate races in Arizona, Alabama, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, California, Wisconsin, Washington, Delaware, Florida, Nevada, Ohio, Kentucky, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oregon, North Carolina, Iowa, Vermont, Idaho and Hawaii.
Please sign up for the Rasmussen Reports daily e-mail update (it’s free) or follow us on Twitter or Facebook. Let us keep you up to date with the latest public opinion news.
See survey questions and toplines. Crosstabs are available to Premium Members only.
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> SHARETHIS.addEntry( ** title: "Election 2010: Indiana Senate", url: 'http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/indiana/election_2010_indiana_senate' }); </SCRIPT>ShareThis
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports Election Edge™ Premium Service offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage available anywhere.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...lections/indiana/election_2010_indiana_senate

 

[roadreeler57]

• Stand With Arizona (and Against Illegal Immigration) Former MEChA radical L.A. Mayor Villaregosa and his "Holocaust"-hyping City Council have enacted a boycott which will not only harm the city's own competitiveness, but it may well be ILLEGAL. Possible violations of the Constitution's Commerce Clause and 14th Amendment...
  
  L.A.’s Illegal Arizona Boycott
  www.frumforum.com The boycotts adopted by Los Angeles and other cities against Arizona in response to the state’s immigration law may be more than self-righteous political posturing. They may also be unconstitutional.
  
  
  
  <FORM class="commentable_item autoexpand_mode" onsubmit=";var d = document.documentElement;return d.onsubmit && d.onsubmit(event);" method=post action=/ajax/ufi/modify.php ajaxify="1"><A href="http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=111627345541631&share_id=120103091354537&comments=1#s120103091354537"><ABBR class=timestamp title="Sun, 16 May 2010 08:55:04 -0700">5 hours ago</ABBR> · <LABEL class=comment_link title="Click here to leave a comment" onclick="return fc_expand(this);">Comment</LABEL> · Share </FORM>
  

 

[roadreeler57]

Need more Signatures

Support Enforcement of Immigration Laws Nationwide

25120 citizens have signed! http://www.numbersusa.com/petition?ID=15