2nd half bet system (bowls)

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
Kansas was a winner. Thank god that losing streak is over!

Posted Record: 3-4-1 (-3.7 units)

Lets try to get it back tomorrow people!
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
Week 10 data added - not good news

Well, this was terrible news on the eve of what should be a great betting day.

Added week 10 data and it's not pretty. Teams with the yardage edge at half went 17-24-1 ATS in the 2H. The overall record for the data compiled is 116-107-8 (52%). 52% is not an acceptable number.

Adjust the range a bit, and we have better numbers. Teams in the differential range of 71-164 are 50-34-3 (60%). Minimum yardage was a disaster though. Had to narrow the range all the way to 132-165 to get the desired result, which was 33-17-1 (66%). Dogs were still the only somewhat profitable bet, going 40-33-2 (55%).

This killed me a bit, I don't know whether to just throw out this "system" and go back to the "feel" I preached in the opening post, or what.

There was some glimmers of hope when I ran some queries and combined data.
- When we had that yardage differential and minimum yardage met, teams were 13-5-1 ATS (72%).
- When the team was in the yardage differential range and was a dog, they went 14-8 ATS (63%).
- Like we saw in the NW game that got me very excited to take that line, when a team has a yardage edge in that range at halftime and is 6 point dogs or more in the 2H, they are 6-0!
- When a team has the yardage edge irregardless of the range, and is 5.5-9.5 point dogs, they are 15-4-1. This is like LSU tonight.
- 6+ point 2H favorites in the yardage range are 21-8-1.

These may be a ton of irrelevant statistics, I'm looking for trends but really am starting to see them disappear or grow weaker as I add data. All I know as of now is I won't play a game that isn't in the yardage range of 71-164, essentially what I stated a while ago. We can't play the better yard team blindly, we need the right "mix" where it's not too close but not too much of a blowout.

I will analyze plays that fit in the 71-164 range and decide if they should have additional units based on trends like those listed above. Lets get 'em tomorrow early starting at 11:00am EST with the Outback Bowl!
 

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
7,041
Tokens
Happy New Year guys. Let's get this thread rolling. Iowa's looking like a great play at half. Thoughts?
 

New member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
509
Tokens
Ya, I like Iowa at -3 or less. S Car QB is dog shit. 3 picks and 1 fumble in 1H.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
Sorry fellas, I just woke up. Went out last night then came back and did the calculations for the system, didn't get to bed until around 7am so I missed the Iowa game. I had the under tagged in this game and it looks to be in good shape.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
20
Tokens
Rose bowl

What are your thoughts on the Rose bowl outcome? & the crap bowl between VT & Cinn?:grandmais
 

Happy Tissues
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
2,333
Tokens
disagree heavy here! Mich. State will roll! Sorry to disagree!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
241
Tokens
If georgia has not woke yet, I doubt they will....we shall see!
<script src="http://shots.snap.com//client/inject.js?site_name=0" type="text/javascript"></script>
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
U like UGA-6.5??
Georgia has been napping all first half. They had 3 turnovers in their own territory (if you count the punt as a "turnover") and MSU only got 6 points. They're the better team out there. MSU has had the ball the entire game, and still done nothing with it. -6.5 is under our key number, and I think this is a gift. Georgia can so easily just hit Green deep in one play and it's a cover, they can just allow Moreono to break one and it's a cover.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
6,266
Tokens
Georgia - MSU


<table class="yspwhitebg" width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="yspsctbg"><td colspan="3" class="ysptblhdr" height="18"> Team Statistics</td> </tr> <tr class="ysptblthbody1" align="right"> <td width="64%" height="18"> </td> <td class="yspdetailttl" width="18%">Bulldogs</td> <td class="yspdetailttl" width="18%">Spartans </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> First Downs</td> <td>7</td> <td>8 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Passing</td> <td>5</td> <td>5 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Rushing</td> <td>2</td> <td>2 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Penalty</td> <td>0</td> <td>1 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Third Down Efficiency</td> <td>1-5</td> <td>3-10 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Fourth Down Efficiency</td> <td>0-1</td> <td>0-1 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> TOTAL NET YARDS</td> <td>117</td> <td>109 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Total Plays</td> <td>28</td> <td>39 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Average Gain Per Play</td> <td>4.2</td> <td>2.8 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> NET YARDS RUSHING</td> <td>46</td> <td>13 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Rushes</td> <td>14</td> <td>22 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Average Per Rush</td> <td>3.3</td> <td>0.6 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> NET YARDS PASSING</td> <td>71</td> <td>96 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Completions-Attempts</td> <td>6-14</td> <td>10-17 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Yards Per Pass Play</td> <td>5.1</td> <td>5.6 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Times Sacked</td> <td>1</td> <td>4 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Yards Lost to Sacks</td> <td>5</td> <td>26 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Had Intercepted</td> <td>1</td> <td>0 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> PUNTS</td> <td>2</td> <td>2 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Average Punt</td> <td>39.5</td> <td>31.5 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> PENALTIES</td> <td>3</td> <td>3 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Penalty Yards</td> <td>25</td> <td>20 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow2" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> FUMBLES</td> <td>1</td> <td>0 </td> </tr> <tr class="ysprow1" align="right"> <td class="first" align="left"> Fumbles Lost</td> <td>1</td> <td>0 </td> </tr> </tbody></table> <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr> <td height="7">
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
41,924
Tokens
Georgia has been napping all first half. They had 3 turnovers in their own territory (if you count the punt as a "turnover") and MSU only got 6 points. They're the better team out there. MSU has had the ball the entire game, and still done nothing with it. -6.5 is under our key number, and I think this is a gift. Georgia can so easily just hit Green deep in one play and it's a cover, they can just allow Moreono to break one and it's a cover.

TY! I was watching the other game more than uga mich st.
 

Porn Star
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
146
Tokens
Had to narrow the range all the way to 132-165 to get the desired result, which was 33-17-1 (66%). Dogs were still the only somewhat profitable bet, going 40-33-2 (55%).

Is this dogs before the game, or dogs at halftime?

There was some glimmers of hope when I ran some queries and combined data.
- When we had that yardage differential and minimum yardage met, teams were 13-5-1 ATS (72%).
- When the team was in the yardage differential range and was a dog, they went 14-8 ATS (63%).
- Like we saw in the NW game that got me very excited to take that line, when a team has a yardage edge in that range at halftime and is 6 point dogs or more in the 2H, they are 6-0!
- When a team has the yardage edge irregardless of the range, and is 5.5-9.5 point dogs, they are 15-4-1. This is like LSU tonight.
- 6+ point 2H favorites in the yardage range are 21-8-1.

Don't get discouraged, Hoos. What you just posted above is just as profitable. It just separates the suckers looking for an easy score from the real gamblers who will be willing to follow the games, put in the effort to break down the numbers, and place their hard earned money on the line and earn a profit.

Another thing you might want to look at if you have the time is Yards Per Point in the first half and see if their is a correlation between that number and 2H ATS cover. I lived in Vegas for 3 years before I moved back to Indy, and I know some of the professional gamblers utilized this statistic. I would do it, but I work 50 hours a week.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,121,058
Messages
13,590,679
Members
101,051
Latest member
qatarairwaysmissedflight
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com