Week 10 data added - not good news
Well, this was terrible news on the eve of what should be a great betting day.
Added week 10 data and it's not pretty. Teams with the yardage edge at half went 17-24-1 ATS in the 2H. The overall record for the data compiled is 116-107-8 (52%). 52% is not an acceptable number.
Adjust the range a bit, and we have better numbers. Teams in the differential range of 71-164 are 50-34-3 (60%). Minimum yardage was a disaster though. Had to narrow the range all the way to 132-165 to get the desired result, which was 33-17-1 (66%). Dogs were still the only somewhat profitable bet, going 40-33-2 (55%).
This killed me a bit, I don't know whether to just throw out this "system" and go back to the "feel" I preached in the opening post, or what.
There was some glimmers of hope when I ran some queries and combined data.
- When we had that yardage differential and minimum yardage met, teams were 13-5-1 ATS (72%).
- When the team was in the yardage differential range and was a dog, they went 14-8 ATS (63%).
- Like we saw in the NW game that got me very excited to take that line, when a team has a yardage edge in that range at halftime and is 6 point dogs or more in the 2H, they are 6-0!
- When a team has the yardage edge irregardless of the range, and is 5.5-9.5 point dogs, they are 15-4-1. This is like LSU tonight.
- 6+ point 2H favorites in the yardage range are 21-8-1.
These may be a ton of irrelevant statistics, I'm looking for trends but really am starting to see them disappear or grow weaker as I add data. All I know as of now is I won't play a game that isn't in the yardage range of 71-164, essentially what I stated a while ago. We can't play the better yard team blindly, we need the right "mix" where it's not too close but not too much of a blowout.
I will analyze plays that fit in the 71-164 range and decide if they should have additional units based on trends like those listed above. Lets get 'em tomorrow early starting at 11:00am EST with the Outback Bowl!