Wsex .... Unreal Shit

EveryGamblersDream · May 6, 2006

SportSavant said:
EGD? what if he had hit for 30 million?

are they liable for the 30 million? (even with that sentence)

Yes I would make them liable. A business should always cover their tracks from start to finish. (no pun intended) If not they pay a price!

SmokeyWins · May 6, 2006

<TABLE class=tborder id=post2847397 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal"> 05-07-2006, 02:45 AM </TD><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal" align=right> #114 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>SportSavant<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_2847397", true); </SCRIPT>
Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: here
Posts: 11,755

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2847397>

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>smokey? are you aware that bookies limit parlay payouts? even though there software may let it go through which is deceiving?
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

YES I AM.......... THAT'S WHY I DONT BET WITH THEM.
WHO GIVES A FLYING HORSE PISS.... I BET WITH WSEX.COM AND THIER SITE SAYS THEY PAYS ACTUAL TRACK PAYOUTS.........

????????????QUESTION FOR EVERYONE???????????

WHAT WAS THE "ACTUAL TRACK PAYOUT ON TODAYS DERBY TRIFECTA??????????????

NOT $600

ARE WE SERIOUS HERE????????????????????

SportSavant · May 6, 2006

smokey, as I stated above, when I learned more about horses, it was easier to understand....

for the record, I do beleive tha they were not clear with their sentence & it caused people to beleive facts that were not true,

I do not beleive they are liable for full damages, but If I were running the book I would make some sort of comprimose with you & make sure the rules are clear for future.... I suggested to steve a link to the payouts would have been nice next to the sentence

lets hope the powers at WSEX will make you a compromise offer... but they are within the rules as they are posted.

I suggest we continue the disccussion in a pleasant manner, we dont need bold type etc, if we are all civil, it will be settled easier.

SmokeyWins · May 6, 2006

05-07-2006, 02:49 AM </TD><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal" align=right> #120 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>InSpades<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_2847411", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Senior

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malibu, California
Posts: 4,584

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2847411>

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by SportSavant
EGD? what if he had hit for 30 million?

are they liable for the 30 million? (even with that sentence)
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

YES. THE WORDING WAS INCORRECT. IF SMOKEY COULD TAKE THESE GUYS TO COURT. HE WOULD WIN HANDS DOWN.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

THANKS... AND DONT THINK I WILL NOT BE ON THE PHONE THIS WEEK WITH HBO... SPORTSCENTER.. I WILL COST THIS ASSHOLES MILLIONS..

I HOPE I SHUT THE PRICKS DOWN.... ALL THIS SHIT OVER $11,000....

HOW MUCH DO YOU THINK THEY MADE TODAY?????????????

SportSavant · May 6, 2006

EveryGamblersDream said:
Yes I would make them liable. A business should always cover their tracks from start to finish. (no pun intended) If not they pay a price!

you might make them liable, but no reasobale judge would, especially if it was in their rules & there was only one misleading sentence.

would a store owner be liable to sell a 10 000$ televeision for 10$ due to an error with the price on the sticker?

SmokeyWins · May 6, 2006

<TABLE class=tborder id=post2847421 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>SportSavant<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_2847421", true); </SCRIPT>
Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: here
Posts: 11,757

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2847421>

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>smokey, as I stated above, when I learned more about horses, it was easier to understand....

for the record, I do beleive tha they were not clear with their sentence & it caused people to beleive facts that were not true,

I do not beleive they are liable for full damages, but If I were running the book I would make some sort of comprimose with you & make sure the rules are clear for future.... I suggested to steve a link to the payouts would have been nice next to the sentence

lets hope the powers at WSEX will make you a compromise offer... but they are within the rules as they are posted.

I suggest we continue the disccussion in a pleasant manner, we dont need bold type etc, if we are all civil, it will be settled easier.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

THANK YOU GOD.... HE IS BACK FROM THE FOG WSEX.COM PUT HIM IN........ BUT THEY ARE NOT WITHIN THE RULES THAT WERE POSTED........

DO I HAVE TO SAY AGAIN WHAT THE SITE SAID...

PLEASE..........

SOME PEOPLE LOSE PARENTS TO CANCER AND TAKE UP FIGHTING CANCER....

WELL.. I HAVE FOUND MY CANCER............ MAD AS HELL AND NOT TAKING IT.... NOT NOW.. NOT EVER..
I WILL HAVE USA TODAY TO HBO UP THAT ASS.

jwblue · May 6, 2006

SportSavant said:
you might make them liable, but no reasobale judge would, especially if it was in their rules & there was only one misleading sentence.

Go smoke another joint.

IS

EveryGamblersDream · May 6, 2006

SportSavant said:
you might make them liable, but no reasobale judge would, especially if it was in their rules & there was only one misleading sentence.

would a store owner be liable to sell a 10 000$ televeision for 10$ due to an error with the price on the sticker?

One misleading statement is one too many.

SmokeyWins · May 6, 2006

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="95%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=headline vAlign=top align=right>Generated: Sat May 6, 20:57 EDT 2006

</TD><TR><TR><TD class=lines-path>World Sports Exchange / Horse Racing / CHURCHILL DOWNS <HR width="100%" color=#000000 SIZE=1></TD></TR> <TR><TD class=horse-events align=middle>ARLINGTON PARK | BELMONT PARK | CALDER | CHURCHILL DOWNS | GOLDEN GATE FIELDS <TR><TD class=horse-events align=middle>HOLLYWOOD PARK | LOUISIANA DOWNS | PIMLICO | WOODBINE <TR><TD><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=horse-events align=middle>
CHURCHILL DOWNS
Weather: | Track Condition:
Payouts based on actual track payouts.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

PLAIN AND SIMPLE ENGLISH

AND WHY SHOULD I NOT THINK I WOULD GET PAID 'ACTUAL TRACK PAYOUTS'??

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

SmokeyWins · May 6, 2006

Inspades... You Know What That Is What I Need... Brb

Doug · May 6, 2006

Smokey: You can take it over to Bill Dozer (SBR) or Roberto (TOW) but I doubt they can assist you. I usually side with the player ( I'm not anybody important), but you are at the mercy of the book here.

I hope something works for you, but WSEX seems inflexible in their position, and I doubt HBO cares about this, or ESPN, 60 minutes, etc.

SportSavant · May 6, 2006

sometimes they happen though, I see it all the time....

retractions in news papers etc etc....

SportSavant · May 6, 2006

smokey,

do not be so sure that WSEX will not attempt to call you or someothing, it may not be till monday or tuesday till head honchos over there read the entire story....

in the meantime, stay polite, let us discuss it like gentlement, & we shall hope for the best....

at the end of the day they have always been an A+ book, let us be patinet... deal?

Dawoofdaddy · May 6, 2006

Will be reassuring to read what Jay C says about this situation.

Smokey, sorry to hear about you losing out on such a nice payout.

Regardless, nothing positive for WSEX will come from this.

I dont bet horses, but I always assumed all books had payout limits.

CoachLT · May 6, 2006

SportSavant said:
you might make them liable, but no reasobale judge would, especially if it was in their rules & there was only one misleading sentence.

SS, so in your world and WSEXs world, everything is great if there is ONLY ONE MISLEADING SENTENCE? That is a crazy analogy! This whole scenario is getting crazier by the minute. LT

box100 · May 6, 2006

i agree with sports savant. Be patient and things should work out in the end. Wsex is a proven winner

SportSavant · May 6, 2006

Code:

 Will be reassuring to read what Jay C says

exactly, let us be patient

jwblue · May 6, 2006

SportSavant said:
smokey,

do not be so sure that WSEX will not attempt to call you or someothing, it may not be till monday or tuesday till head honchos over there read the entire story....

in the meantime, stay polite, let us discuss it like gentlement, & we shall hope for the best....

at the end of the day they have always been an A+ book, let us be patinet... deal?

Smokey,

I agree 100% with this. I am sure this will make this way to the head of WSEX. I can't see how they won't side with you. Books make mistakes and a lot of times they own up to them. I would give them a chance to correct their mistake.

IS

SmokeyWins · May 6, 2006

<TABLE class=tborder id=post2847359 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal"> 05-07-2006, 02:34 AM </TD><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal" align=right> #102 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>wsexsteve<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_2847359", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Junior

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 73

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2847359>

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>Smokey,

Please stop editing what we said. It said payouts are BASED on actual track odds BASED MEANS DERIVED FROM We never claimed to pay actual track odds on trifectas.

We have had these exact rules for 10 years. Everyday trifectas have been paid out the exact same way. Everyday some trifectas are reduced to a nax 300-1 payout. This is nothing new or misleading. BASED on actual track odds was added so people didn't think they would be paid the morning line on the program
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

THAT IS TOTAL BULLSHIT... IT WAS ADDED SO PEOPLE WOULD KNOW (THINK) THAT THEY WOULD BE PAID THE ACTUAL PAYOUT THAT OCCURED AT THE TRACK....

SO YOU ARE SAYING THAT IF A HORSE OPENED AT 60-1 YOU JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN THE HORSE WENT OFF AT 4-1 THE PLAYER DID NOT THINK HE WOULD STILL GET 60-1 EVEN WHEN EVERYONE AT THE TRACK WAS PAID 4-1... SURE...

I GUESS YOU WANT ME TO BUY SOME BEACH CONDO IN TULSA TOO..

GET REAL.. YOU KNOW WHY IT'S THERE.. TO GET PEOPLE LIKE ME TO THINK YOU WOULD ACTUALLY PAY WHAT WAS PAID TO EVERYONE AT THE TRACK....

PLEASE DON'T PLAY ME LIKE THAT.......

SportSavant · May 6, 2006

smokey, I have no reason to disbeleive that some people may beleive that they are getting morning odds & not know the difference,

lets be patient & polite

Wsex .... Unreal Shit

Member

Member

New member

Member

New member

Member

New member

Member

Member

Member

Rx God

New member

New member

Triple digit silver kook

"It's great to be alive and ahead by seven" Mort o

New member

New member

New member

Member

New member

Forum statistics

Share this page