tell her if she would put out more you wouldnt need to wack it to porn. women are ridiculous. they put out like crazy in the initial 6 months but once you get married they barely want to do it anymore and then get pissed if you are looking at porn.
if she put out more and made you so tired of sex you wouldnt need porn. tell her its her duty as a wife...now get on it
if she put out more and made you so tired of sex you wouldnt need porn. tell her its her duty as a wife...now get on it
What type of porn was it and how much does your wife know about computers , that is main question here ... I got busted myself a few monthes back , But I bullshitted my way out of it - mainly because my girlfriend doesnt know shit about computers , basically only uses it to chat and check her email. So I told her ... Yea , these sites pop up all the time , Theres nothing I did ... It happened on its own. One of my friends must have opened a site ... I usually have several friends over a week , who if anything use my computer to check scores and place bets ... I said one of them , must have pulled the shit up and now these damn pop-ups come up all the time ( I might have to have somebody come in and take a look at it ) Cause if she doesnt know shit about computers , pretend you don't either - that way she'll feel comfort in the fact that your both a couple of computer Ilitiots ...
any korean?
damn...i love this stuff...any korean gals ?
here are a couple of links
http://web.6park.com/bbs3/first1.shtml
http://www.genie.x0.com/alabout/list.phtml?offset=0&no=7&step=20&bid=0&istep=100&nodelc=99
The first one in Chinese, the second in Japanese. I can read the Chinese one, but not the Japanese one. However, it is very easy to figure out, if you know what I mean. You will need a bit torrent client if you decide to download any thing. If the wife walks in again on you, just say you are trying to learn a foreign language, or just pretend you have no idea how you arrived at a there, and you thought it was about something esle.
ope:
damn...i love this stuff...any korean gals ?
porn is the best release any man can have besides the reeel thing.......do u masturbate ???? i'm bettin u do .....what person on this earth doesn't ? that's perfectly Normal And while u R playin with urself YOu R Obviously AROUSED by Sum Sort of Fantasy whether its Porn or Another Sexual Being ! WE R Human ....SEX IS GOOD ..And pon is A Great Aid In That Sexual Freedom...Not To say , its OK To Cheet , But It's Definitely OK To BEeeet OFF "cause We R All Guilty of that ! That's the joke ...N Then people act like they r horrified when it Comes to ssex ....What HYpocrites!!!:hump:
http://www.reflector.com/look/hax/hax-husbands-interest-porn-hasnt-waned-1167361
Hax: Husband's interest in porn hasn't waned
Wednesday, August 8, 20120 Comments | Leave a Comment
Share on print*PrintShare on email*E-Mail
Share on reddit*RedditMore Sharing ServicesMore
Q I would like your advice. I have been married for 25-plus years to a great guy with one exception, his interest in porn. I knew during the three years we dated that he had a collection of porn magazines in his apartment. I did not like them and we occasionally argued about them. Once, I threw them out and he became very angry.
After we were married, I assumed there would be no more need for porn as he would have more access to me sexually as his wife. I would constantly find porn magazines hidden in our house, I would throw them out, we would argue and it would happen again. Then we bought our first computer and he found all kinds of free porn to download. I would find it on the computer, delete it, we would argue, I’d find more the next week, and so on. Now he has a smartphone with lots of downloaded porn. I haven’t said much because I know I shouldn’t be looking at his phone and he could easily password-protect it.
What bothers me is that over all the years of our marriage, I have told him that porn use hurts me and offends me. He has told me that what he looks at is not my business. It also bothers me that he is hiding something from me. He accuses me of snooping and refuses to talk to me about it. We have a good sex life, but sometimes I do withhold from him because I feel that is one way I can punish him for looking at porn when he knows it hurts me.
I know that I can’t control what he looks at, but I wish that he would respect me enough not to look at it. Is this my problem or his? — K.
A So what if he uses porn, you withhold sex to punish him and he uses porn to punish you for withholding? The mandala of marital misery.
Here are the facts you have at your disposal now:
(1) Marriage does not fix problems or change who someone is.
(2) There’s no simplistic, zero-sum relationship between porn use and sex. Sometimes having ready access to one of them will diminish one’s interest in the other, but plenty of people are happy to indulge in both (or neither).
(3) You have accrued 28-plus years of proof that your husband will not stop using porn. You and he can make it a matter of morality, of sex, of respect, of trust, of communication, of technology, of feelings, of privacy, of control, of the weight ratios of birds carrying coconuts, and he will not stop using porn.
These facts narrow your choices down to two: marriage with porn, or divorce.
Should you choose to remain married, I urge you to stop ferreting out his smut from his various hiding places. You know it’s there, you know it offends you, you know you can’t make it go away, so why not also know that you accomplish nothing with your purges except to singe your retinas and renew your outrage?
It’s not denial I suggest, but informed distance. Whether you keep your husband’s stash at arm’s length or at a different address from yours, that’s up to you.
Hax: Husband's interest in porn hasn't waned
Wednesday, August 8, 20120 Comments | Leave a Comment
Share on print*PrintShare on email*E-Mail
Share on reddit*RedditMore Sharing ServicesMore
Q I would like your advice. I have been married for 25-plus years to a great guy with one exception, his interest in porn. I knew during the three years we dated that he had a collection of porn magazines in his apartment. I did not like them and we occasionally argued about them. Once, I threw them out and he became very angry.
After we were married, I assumed there would be no more need for porn as he would have more access to me sexually as his wife. I would constantly find porn magazines hidden in our house, I would throw them out, we would argue and it would happen again. Then we bought our first computer and he found all kinds of free porn to download. I would find it on the computer, delete it, we would argue, I’d find more the next week, and so on. Now he has a smartphone with lots of downloaded porn. I haven’t said much because I know I shouldn’t be looking at his phone and he could easily password-protect it.
What bothers me is that over all the years of our marriage, I have told him that porn use hurts me and offends me. He has told me that what he looks at is not my business. It also bothers me that he is hiding something from me. He accuses me of snooping and refuses to talk to me about it. We have a good sex life, but sometimes I do withhold from him because I feel that is one way I can punish him for looking at porn when he knows it hurts me.
I know that I can’t control what he looks at, but I wish that he would respect me enough not to look at it. Is this my problem or his? — K.
A So what if he uses porn, you withhold sex to punish him and he uses porn to punish you for withholding? The mandala of marital misery.
Here are the facts you have at your disposal now:
(1) Marriage does not fix problems or change who someone is.
(2) There’s no simplistic, zero-sum relationship between porn use and sex. Sometimes having ready access to one of them will diminish one’s interest in the other, but plenty of people are happy to indulge in both (or neither).
(3) You have accrued 28-plus years of proof that your husband will not stop using porn. You and he can make it a matter of morality, of sex, of respect, of trust, of communication, of technology, of feelings, of privacy, of control, of the weight ratios of birds carrying coconuts, and he will not stop using porn.
These facts narrow your choices down to two: marriage with porn, or divorce.
Should you choose to remain married, I urge you to stop ferreting out his smut from his various hiding places. You know it’s there, you know it offends you, you know you can’t make it go away, so why not also know that you accomplish nothing with your purges except to singe your retinas and renew your outrage?
It’s not denial I suggest, but informed distance. Whether you keep your husband’s stash at arm’s length or at a different address from yours, that’s up to you.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...y-pornography-changes-20131111,0,548824.story
www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/s...y-pornography-changes-20131111,0,548824.story
[h=1]chicagotribune.com[/h][h=2]Orland Park library reviewing porn policy[/h][h=3]Orland Park checking IDs of computer users, but says Web content protected[/h]By Taylor W. Anderson, Chicago Tribune reporter
7:50 AM CST, November 11, 2013
<tbody>
</tbody>
A suburban library is altering its computer procedures while it reviews a controversial policy that allows adult patrons to view pornography.
The Orland Park Public Library will now check identification of anyone accessing computers in the adult section, said library spokeswoman Bridget Bittman. Before the new measure, users could sign onto the 18-years-and-older computers with only their library card information.
The library hasn't changed its policy that allows adults access to any legal material, including pornography.
The new measure was put in place after the library's policy came under fire last month at a board meeting, when two patrons confronted officials about the Internet policy. One of the patrons later posted a video of the meeting online that has been viewed by thousands.
The library board at a special budgetary session last week reiterated its stance behind its computer policy, which it says upholds First Amendment rights to free speech. The library is still reviewing its policies, Bittman said.
"I believe they realize that if something is going to be changed, they should do it in short order rather than over a period of time," Bittman said.
At the contentious Oct. 21 board meeting in Orland Park, patrons complained that the library's Internet policies weren't in line with those of public libraries in surrounding communities.
The Tribune reported last week that there is no consensus among Chicago-area libraries on Internet policy. Public libraries in nearby Mokena, Tinley Park, Frankfort and Lockport forbid viewing pornography on library computers. Libraries in Arlington Heights, Evanston and the Chicago Public Library have Internet policies similar to those in Orland Park.
"One of the more difficult things ... is when you talk to people about filtering and pornography in libraries and you try to explain to them that porn is legally protected speech," said Emily Knox, an assistant professor at the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
In recent weeks, Bittman said the library has received calls from patrons who support and oppose the policy.
Some library users have expressed their feelings in person. Recently, two women who came to the library to become members got upset when someone approached them outside and handed them a flier citing "sex crimes in the library."
"They came back in with the flier, slammed it on our circulation desk and said, 'I will never come here again,'" Bittman said.
Orland Park police are investigating an Oct. 31 incident in which a patron told library staff she saw a man in the computer area masturbating. The library called police, who spoke with the man and determined the report was unfounded, according to police reports.
Orland Park police Cmdr. John Keating said that case "is still pending investigation" because officers were unable to get the name or identification of the woman who made the claim.
Documents obtained by the Tribune through a Freedom of Information request show that in the last 12 years the library filed three internal reports based on complaints about patrons who were accessing pornographic sites, including the unfounded Oct. 31 complaint and another grievance involving a man allegedly viewing child pornography on a computer in 2011.
The man denied the claim when library staff questioned him at the time, saying the image was a pop-up advertisement, according to the library's report. Police are investigating.
Another report claimed a young boy in 2002 was found viewing pornography on a computer in the library's primary room. The boy was not supposed to be allowed on the computer without permission and was issued a warning. Staff also told the boy's mother.
The library is expecting a big crowd at its Nov. 18 board meeting, when officials likely will address its policy, Bittman said.
Orland Park resident Polly Pellicer-Steel saidshe's considering pushing for a new policy that bans pornography from all library computers.
"Do you think that's not the first place someone with ill intent is going to go now that the library is more or less opening the door for them?" asked Pellicer-Steel. "Not all people that watch porn are bad, but you're going to have the predators."
Bittman said patrons are encouraged to report to staff if someone is accessing material that offends them.
"No. 1 on our list is to keep our kids safe," Bittman said. "I don't know how else to put it."
twanderson@tribune.com
Twitter @TaylorWAnderson
Copyright © 2013 Chicago Tribune Company, LLC
www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/s...y-pornography-changes-20131111,0,548824.story
[h=1]chicagotribune.com[/h][h=2]Orland Park library reviewing porn policy[/h][h=3]Orland Park checking IDs of computer users, but says Web content protected[/h]By Taylor W. Anderson, Chicago Tribune reporter
7:50 AM CST, November 11, 2013
| Advertisement |
<tbody>
</tbody>
A suburban library is altering its computer procedures while it reviews a controversial policy that allows adult patrons to view pornography.
The Orland Park Public Library will now check identification of anyone accessing computers in the adult section, said library spokeswoman Bridget Bittman. Before the new measure, users could sign onto the 18-years-and-older computers with only their library card information.
The library hasn't changed its policy that allows adults access to any legal material, including pornography.
The new measure was put in place after the library's policy came under fire last month at a board meeting, when two patrons confronted officials about the Internet policy. One of the patrons later posted a video of the meeting online that has been viewed by thousands.
The library board at a special budgetary session last week reiterated its stance behind its computer policy, which it says upholds First Amendment rights to free speech. The library is still reviewing its policies, Bittman said.
"I believe they realize that if something is going to be changed, they should do it in short order rather than over a period of time," Bittman said.
At the contentious Oct. 21 board meeting in Orland Park, patrons complained that the library's Internet policies weren't in line with those of public libraries in surrounding communities.
The Tribune reported last week that there is no consensus among Chicago-area libraries on Internet policy. Public libraries in nearby Mokena, Tinley Park, Frankfort and Lockport forbid viewing pornography on library computers. Libraries in Arlington Heights, Evanston and the Chicago Public Library have Internet policies similar to those in Orland Park.
"One of the more difficult things ... is when you talk to people about filtering and pornography in libraries and you try to explain to them that porn is legally protected speech," said Emily Knox, an assistant professor at the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
In recent weeks, Bittman said the library has received calls from patrons who support and oppose the policy.
Some library users have expressed their feelings in person. Recently, two women who came to the library to become members got upset when someone approached them outside and handed them a flier citing "sex crimes in the library."
"They came back in with the flier, slammed it on our circulation desk and said, 'I will never come here again,'" Bittman said.
Orland Park police are investigating an Oct. 31 incident in which a patron told library staff she saw a man in the computer area masturbating. The library called police, who spoke with the man and determined the report was unfounded, according to police reports.
Orland Park police Cmdr. John Keating said that case "is still pending investigation" because officers were unable to get the name or identification of the woman who made the claim.
Documents obtained by the Tribune through a Freedom of Information request show that in the last 12 years the library filed three internal reports based on complaints about patrons who were accessing pornographic sites, including the unfounded Oct. 31 complaint and another grievance involving a man allegedly viewing child pornography on a computer in 2011.
The man denied the claim when library staff questioned him at the time, saying the image was a pop-up advertisement, according to the library's report. Police are investigating.
Another report claimed a young boy in 2002 was found viewing pornography on a computer in the library's primary room. The boy was not supposed to be allowed on the computer without permission and was issued a warning. Staff also told the boy's mother.
The library is expecting a big crowd at its Nov. 18 board meeting, when officials likely will address its policy, Bittman said.
Orland Park resident Polly Pellicer-Steel saidshe's considering pushing for a new policy that bans pornography from all library computers.
"Do you think that's not the first place someone with ill intent is going to go now that the library is more or less opening the door for them?" asked Pellicer-Steel. "Not all people that watch porn are bad, but you're going to have the predators."
Bittman said patrons are encouraged to report to staff if someone is accessing material that offends them.
"No. 1 on our list is to keep our kids safe," Bittman said. "I don't know how else to put it."
twanderson@tribune.com
Twitter @TaylorWAnderson
Copyright © 2013 Chicago Tribune Company, LLC
Lemme chime in here. Same happened to me. Basically women see it the same as cheating. Your squirting ur splooge over another girl that AIN"T her. It'll take a while for her to get over it and believe me she will be on your ass for days on end. It goes 2 ways. Either you quit all together or your get her to get with the program. If you keep it and she's still not down with it, then make sure you go through the regular methods of hiding it deep in the vault and eliminating all traces.
