Why should I believe him if you don’t believe someone from the other side? See how it works? I’m not saying you are wrong, just that you are not looking at both sides. You are just believing what the news media has told you. I’ve read Thibodeaus book and I believe there is more to it than what the news tells you. But of course, you are always right and I’m a 911 conspirator just because I don’t agree with you.
SUMMARY OF THE NEGOTIATIONS
ATF requested assistance from the FBI on February 28, 1993 after ATF agents had attempted to serve an arrest and search warrant on the Branch Davidian Compound. Four ATF agents were killed, 20 agents wounded and an unknown number of Davidians were killed and wounded in the ensuing gun battle.
From the official DOJ report on the incident. If you don't believe it, you just don't accept their findings which is fine.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/pu...an-stand-waco-texas-february-28-april-19-1993
i said I didn’t believe it a long time ago because I’m willing to look at both sides before making an opinion. You on the other hand have your opinion based on what the news and government told you only, and if someone disagrees, you need to argue with them which is what you have been doing all day. And so what if it was 25 years ago, they still lied about things. They have admitted they lied about certain things so why would I believe some report. You can believe it if you want to.
See, this is the weird part about you and Harry Balls. We're having a discussion on a forum but if I disagree with you, I'm arguing with you. But if you disagree with me, you aren't arguing? See how that works? It's a forum, we discuss items on a forum. We all don't agree on things. I'm not arguing with any of you shit heads. I just don't agree with you. So what?
There is an official accounting regarding the Waco raid (I'm only talking about the raid). I believe the official accounting and you don't. So what? I believe the account and you don't. Who cares?
